NP. I think you should take your own advice. Envy/jealousy is not a "trait." It's a normal human emotion that is incredibly common. The PP you are quoting is a mentally healthy person experiencing a very normal thing-- someone she knows has some extremely valuable and beneficial things PP wishes she had. That's it. It happens to everyone, and is not a moral failing. OP and others in this thread are experiencing that SUPER NORMAL felling regarding housing. This is totally unsurprising because we live on n an area with really expensive housing. The takeaway here is not that people who feel this way are bad people who need your lessons in how to act or feel (also, I hope you can recognize the irony in telling people to focus on themselves and mind their own business while we're going in on the merit of their thoughts and feelings). The take away is that being very fortunate, especially financially, is likely to involve jealousy. The end. It's just the reality and trade off to having a lot. There is no read n to freak out about it. I'd still rather have a lot of money or a nice house (knowing friends and neighbors might envy me) so it's a tradeoff I'm happy with. Demanding that everyone be happy for you that you have so much more than them is deranged. And some people actually will be happy for you (while also feeling jealous). Humans are complex. But melting down over the idea that envy exists is so weird. Who cares? I 100% guarantee you feel envy sometimes too, you just won't admit it. |
Ooo yeah, this is me. I’m not a train wreck and I haven’t squandered anything. I’m pretty responsible! Never been fired, arrested, genuinely pretty good at my job, etc etc. I just have like, $5m than I’ve earned and that’s not even counting any of the tuition etc. AND I have dramatically different retirement requirements, which really frees us to take entrepreneurial risks and do things like have a SAHP for a while. I guess we’ll all get cancer? |
All the adult children on our block of CCMD are licking their chops to get back into their childhood homes. Proximity to great privates and great publics, easy commute to work, big yards and parks for their kids to play, what's there not to like? We know of a couple of families who are within a few houses from their childhood homes. And one who actually had to buy their childhood home from a third party because their parents sold it and they're always complaining/ laughing about it |
Sorry $5m MORE than I’ve earned obviously |
Right. Which is probably the much more common story than the boozing drug addict trust fund kid who ruins their life because their parents paid for college. The unfair reality is that some people have a lot more advantages and get a lot of help in life. The emotionally mature response to this is to be happy for them and understand that no ill was done to you just because your parents werent rich and you had to earn every penny yourself. The hate for trust funders and old money types on here is just very predictable and frankly embarrassing. Envy is such a bad look |
In theory they live elsewhere, no? Just curious how they think parents will give them a house but what will the siblings get? If parents have tons of $$$s so that they just give the kid that gets the house less cash, well then these adult children are wealthy and can buy their childhood home equivalent outright, no? |
Factually, most generational wealth is squandered in 3 generations. The stats are 60% is lost by the 2nd generation and 90% by the 3rd. |
Yep, third generation curse. This is probably why people like Warren Buffet are giving most of their wealth to charity. |
Who cares? Some will keep it, some won't. Some of these old money families are several generations deep, and have a wealth of social connections worth their weight in gold. It will be up to their descendants to maintain things, same for the new rich couples, which probably have a much higher likelihood of raising drug addict silly wastrels considering they dont have many generations used to having money. |
Not quite what the stats show. Time and time again the first generation works hard and is highly successful. Second generation watched them work hard so has a sense of money and manages things ok. Third generation is spoiled and entitled and that is the end of the wealth in 90% of situations. |
Yeah, I'm a trust fund kid and I would never want to live in my parents' house. For one thing, they live there! I'm grown and living my life, and by the time they pass away or move to assisted living, god willing, I will be well past middle aged. For another it's my parents' house! Wouldn't that be weird? I could see moving to a house near theirs, but moving into their actual house would weird me out. |
Except by the time youre dealing with true old money families, theyve surpassed that stat and through clever money management, passing down an attitude of frugality and conservatism, and connections, theyve managed to keep the money flowing for generations. Escaping that particular familial curse. The new money families are the ones who should be concerned about it. And after all, if running out of money is an inevitability, according to your philosophy- time's gonna catch up with the new money strivers as well, so who cares whether it's in two or three generations? After all, it's just a matter of time for both, so why feel smug about a few extra years? How is that a win? |
Nobody cares...but PPs have indicated that wealth just seems to continue for many generations, which is not factually true. Putting aside anecdotes which are a terrible way to prove any point, the facts are that generations do squander generational wealth. So, It's more accurate that the trust fund kid doesn't end up doing much productive because of the wealth, and then leaves less to their progeny, and by the 3rd generation it is all gone. |
No, the biggest problem with the third generation, and subsequent generations, is that they are big. I'm a 4th gen in a family and my kids will inherit, theoretically, 20x shares in the gen 1 company as the children of one of my 4th gen cousins, and that's just a function of people having more or fewer kids. Nobody "squandered" anything. I don't think the "social connections" are nearly as big a deal as people think, except for the one that gets you the first job. But those chits are getting harder to cash in as people, quite rightly, tighten their hiring practices. |
It often does continue for generations, as old money families prove. The ones that last for centuries often have frugal tricks up their sleeve (such as giving their house to offspring, learning to live frugally even though you have the trust) that new money people could never understand. Most of those stats are for people who suddenly get rich- aka the nouveau riche strivers that love to brag about the big house they bought. Ironic, isn't it? |