Kate Middleton looks really happy lately

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure about “dignity” role model. Feel like you have to have very little dignity in order to do what you have to do to get married to a future king, especially one who is rumored to have lots of temper tantrums. No thanks.

ITA. She chased after (or waited for) that man for 10 years of her life.

Another in agreement. I don't think it's particularly dignified to take someone back after cheating and who makes it clear you're the backup. I guess she's dignified in putting up with humiliation but I don't find that particularly admirable.

DP. It’s not dignified and not what most people would want for their daughters. However, she really sacrificed a lot for her family or origin. If it weren’t for being royal adjacent her parents would’ve gone broke years ago and her siblings, especially her bummy brother, would not have been able to marry as well as he did.

+1 same for her sister. No way Pippa would’ve landed a billionaire.

[Anonymous]

Well, Sussex Squad is here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Royal nemesis wont be around much longer. Loud rumors of Harry and Megan divorce.

Same for Kate and Will. With rumors of (at least one) possible illegitimate children from Will, as well.

That’s interesting. I’d never heard this one about Wills. If memory serves, Phillip was suspected of having an illegitimate child, too.

NP. The rumors are that Rose Hanbury’s youngest is William’s. The argument is that her husband is gay, Charles seems to make a big effort to keep them close and gave them prominent roles at the coronation, and the youngest is also frequently photographed separately than the other kids.

I personally can’t believe William would be that stupid and would be shocked if it were true.

Sure and people have said for years that Harry was actually what's-his-name's son when he's clearly his father's son. Same for Rose's children.

TBF, we have no idea if it’s the same. William has not shown himself to be above a little side action with an accidental pregnancy.

Any proof? Or are you talking out of your arse?

I think you know the answer to that.

I don’t. Help me out.

You don’t know what you’re accusing William of?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, Sussex Squad is here.

It seems like there are far more haters of Kate’s sister-in-law than fans of Kate herself. Just interesting! And in the same way, one doesn’t have to be a fan of her SIL to dislike the monarchy. There were anti-monarchists long before this generation of royals came of age.

[Anonymous]

^ And I don’t mean to say there are more people who hate MM, but those that do don’t seem to be equally passionate about their love for the BRF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Royal nemesis wont be around much longer. Loud rumors of Harry and Megan divorce.

Same for Kate and Will. With rumors of (at least one) possible illegitimate children from Will, as well.

That’s interesting. I’d never heard this one about Wills. If memory serves, Phillip was suspected of having an illegitimate child, too.

NP. The rumors are that Rose Hanbury’s youngest is William’s. The argument is that her husband is gay, Charles seems to make a big effort to keep them close and gave them prominent roles at the coronation, and the youngest is also frequently photographed separately than the other kids.

I personally can’t believe William would be that stupid and would be shocked if it were true.

Sure and people have said for years that Harry was actually what's-his-name's son when he's clearly his father's son. Same for Rose's children.

TBF, we have no idea if it’s the same. William has not shown himself to be above a little side action with an accidental pregnancy.

Any proof? Or are you talking out of your arse?

I think you know the answer to that.

I don’t. Help me out.

You don’t know what you’re accusing William of?

It’s speculation….like everyone does here. Yes, I think it’s possible because stories about William show him to be a bit of an ass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, Sussex Squad is here.

They arrived long ago. The Kate-bashing is several pages long by now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Royal nemesis wont be around much longer. Loud rumors of Harry and Megan divorce.

Same for Kate and Will. With rumors of (at least one) possible illegitimate children from Will, as well.

That’s interesting. I’d never heard this one about Wills. If memory serves, Phillip was suspected of having an illegitimate child, too.

NP. The rumors are that Rose Hanbury’s youngest is William’s. The argument is that her husband is gay, Charles seems to make a big effort to keep them close and gave them prominent roles at the coronation, and the youngest is also frequently photographed separately than the other kids.

I personally can’t believe William would be that stupid and would be shocked if it were true.

Sure and people have said for years that Harry was actually what's-his-name's son when he's clearly his father's son. Same for Rose's children.

TBF, we have no idea if it’s the same. William has not shown himself to be above a little side action with an accidental pregnancy.

Any proof? Or are you talking out of your arse?

I think you know the answer to that.

I don’t. Help me out.

You don’t know what you’re accusing William of?

It’s speculation….like everyone does here. Yes, I think it’s possible because stories about William show him to be a bit of an ass.

“You” think. LOL.

[Anonymous]

The double standards are interesting. The Sussex threads all get deleted or locked very quickly, but the open season on the Waleses continues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The double standards are interesting. The Sussex threads all get deleted or locked very quickly, but the open season on the Waleses continues.

Wishing death and destruction to people (and to folks who defend those people) usually does that to threads.

There’s no double standard, PP, if you use critical thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The double standards are interesting. The Sussex threads all get deleted or locked very quickly, but the open season on the Waleses continues.

Wishing death and destruction to people (and to folks who defend those people) usually does that to threads.

There’s no double standard, PP, if you use critical thinking.

Who’s wishing “death and destruction”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The double standards are interesting. The Sussex threads all get deleted or locked very quickly, but the open season on the Waleses continues.

+

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, Sussex Squad is here.

They arrived long ago. The Kate-bashing is several pages long by now.

This is what I object to
I found the Diana mania a bit much
The queen was also elevated to a god like status, not that she needed or deserved criticism, but these are all humans who do have flaws as well and are not gods

So what is the purpose of calling people Sussex squad?
Are we supposed to shut up and buy the tabloid propaganda about how wonderful these people are and be believers?

I do not admire Kate or adore her, I really doubt these people live up to the image portrayed about them

The Sussex squad accusation is out of line

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure about “dignity” role model. Feel like you have to have very little dignity in order to do what you have to do to get married to a future king, especially one who is rumored to have lots of temper tantrums. No thanks.

ITA. She chased after (or waited for) that man for 10 years of her life.

Another in agreement. I don't think it's particularly dignified to take someone back after cheating and who makes it clear you're the backup. I guess she's dignified in putting up with humiliation but I don't find that particularly admirable.

+1
....she was raised to be a social climber and now she's on the top of the pyramid. Success at all costs - in this case the price was personal dignity and the reward was social status and a crappy husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, Sussex Squad is here.

They arrived long ago. The Kate-bashing is several pages long by now.

This is what I object to
I found the Diana mania a bit much
The queen was also elevated to a god like status, not that she needed or deserved criticism, but these are all humans who do have flaws as well and are not gods

So what is the purpose of calling people Sussex squad?
Are we supposed to shut up and buy the tabloid propaganda about how wonderful these people are and be believers?

I do not admire Kate or adore her, I really doubt these people live up to the image portrayed about them

The Sussex squad accusation is out of line

You shut down even the tiniest criticism of Meghan and Harry but sure let’s believe you.