Ditch the mcmansion and luxury cars, and you OP go to a mommy lawyer job at a nonprofit. Or pursue in house harder. I would get out. You think you are tired now? Your kids are only 2 and 6. Imagine both kids with tons of school projects and reports and after school activities, OMG. The jump from 2nd to 3rd grade alone is huge. In the future, if DH makes partner, you revert back to luxury lifestyle. |
For the record, I'm dad shaming too. 2 parents who see their kid for 30 minutes a day are, in fact, bad parents. |
I vote for DH to step back, or for them both to get "normal" jobs. |
+1. Let's do the math. Your spouse works 13 hours/day at his day job, and you work 11 hours/day at your day job. Subtracting 8 hours for sleep, that leaves your spouse 3 hours per day for personal hygiene, eating, and kids. That leaves you 5 hours for the same, plus meal prep, dropoff/pickup, appointments, etc. The only way this is sustainable is if you outsource everything you're doing before and after work, plus all meal preparation and cleanup. And that's fine, but be honest and acknowledge THE REALITY. There isn't a solution that magically gives you 8 more hours per day or magically makes everything get done over the weekend (although being in law, I assume weekends are just 2 more workdays). |
| It sounds like you have no time for exercise, leisure/fun, or sex. This will not end well. |
How did I guess you were both biglaw? You’re making your choice - material things over time with your kids. There’s no fix for it. |
|
You need to talk to your nanny about increasing her hours. You keep coming home at the same time but you have an extra set of hands from nanny.
Also set up a weekend sitter with four hours guaranteed on Saturday for errands. You can even take the older child with you some more time with them. |
Isn’t this what’s known as the “two-income trap”? You’ve jacked up your expenses and now you need to work crazy hours. FWIW, DH makes $275k at this current job (I make $175k). He had the opportunity for a role that would pay $350-400k (i.e., guaranteed private school for our kids) but we both agreed to turn it down because it would bump up his working hours from 8-9 hours/day to 12+ hours a day. He likes the bond with his children. |
|
Keep your nanny and get a full time housekeeper who handles everything: grocery shopping, laundry, changing beds, cleaning and, if you’re lucky, food prep and cooking. Have her start at 11 and stay through dinner dishes and making school lunches.
Increase the nanny’s hours a bit to help you while you’re home. There’s no denying that an extra set of hands is helpful! |
And op and op’s DH doesn’t “have to” work those hours. One big law salary can sustain a family. She and her DH are choosing lifestyle and career to the detriment of their relationship with their kids. |
| Lolling forever at suggestions for a full time housekeeper and private chef for 2 biglaw associates. They aren’t hedge fund managers! |
A full time housekeeper is very affordable for two big law associates. Get real. |
Poor kids |
I don’t agree. The idea of biglaw is to save up some money, not spend it all. If they’re both equity partners now that’s one thing but that’s not the impression I’m getting. |
| It’s not sustainable. Are you really going to spend all of your hours working just so you can have a bigger house, more expensive cars, and private elementary? That’s just sad. One of both of you needs to dial back before you miss your kids’ entire childhoods. |