school reopening survey asking about anti-bias/anti-racist programming

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:seriously who is going to say ON A NON-ANONYMOUS SURVEY "meh I don't want my kids to have anti-racist education."

Clearly there are some...

[Anonymous]

this is the laugh I needed today. Thank you, survey designer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

Not really. If we were asked this, I also might not be totally honest. It's silly to ask people such a loaded question and expect them to answer honestly when it isn't anonymous. You are skewing the results automatically. It would be different if they question were neutral like, by the way, how do you like the lunch offerings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:seriously who is going to say ON A NON-ANONYMOUS SURVEY "meh I don't want my kids to have anti-racist education."

Clearly there are some...

When attached to whether or not you also want IPL? No. This is the immediate introduction of bias.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

Not really. If we were asked this, I also might not be totally honest. It's silly to ask people such a loaded question and expect them to answer honestly when it isn't anonymous. You are skewing the results automatically. It would be different if they question were neutral like, by the way, how do you like the lunch offerings?

I would not answer such a garbage-design survey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

Not really. If we were asked this, I also might not be totally honest. It's silly to ask people such a loaded question and expect them to answer honestly when it isn't anonymous. You are skewing the results automatically. It would be different if they question were neutral like, by the way, how do you like the lunch offerings?

I would not answer such a garbage-design survey.

Perhaps that’s how they’re weeding folks out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

DP. Not paranoid at all, given how much people who want IPL have been vilified as racist.

[Anonymous]

That survey makes me want to leave DCPS even more. What a load of crap.

[Anonymous]

"Ah look! 100% of our parents are highly interested in anti-racism material!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

DP. Not paranoid at all, given how much people who want IPL have been vilified as racist.

So you think they’ll have your kids come back for IPL only to have ABAR sessions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

DP. Not paranoid at all, given how much people who want IPL have been vilified as racist.

So you think they’ll have your kids come back for IPL only to have ABAR sessions?

HAHHHa perfection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

Yeah to the PP - no schools have every done social engineering before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

Not really. If we were asked this, I also might not be totally honest. It's silly to ask people such a loaded question and expect them to answer honestly when it isn't anonymous. You are skewing the results automatically. It would be different if they question were neutral like, by the way, how do you like the lunch offerings?

I would not answer such a garbage-design survey.

Perhaps that’s how they’re weeding folks out.

And that’s whyI never answer surveys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

Yeah to the PP - no schools have every done social engineering before.

Right! Remember all the Just Say No assemblies from the 80s?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

DP. Not paranoid at all, given how much people who want IPL have been vilified as racist.

So you think they’ll have your kids come back for IPL only to have ABAR sessions?

As a teaacher, I wouldn't mind this at all. Clearly the students (and parents) need it.