school reopening survey asking about anti-bias/anti-racist programming

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL they are going to see if your support for anti-racism correlates with your interest in remaining DL.


What’s the association?


Obviously only racists want IPL.


I think the most vocal IPL parents are the least open to anti-racism.


Whether that is true or not, it is atrocious survey design to ask about anti-racist initiatives on a survey specifically designed to assess interest in IPL.



Meh, it’s not some scientific study. I have better things about which to worry.
Anonymous
So if I want my kids back in-person, how do I answer the antiracism question?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL they are going to see if your support for anti-racism correlates with your interest in remaining DL.


What’s the association?


Obviously only racists want IPL.


I think the most vocal IPL parents are the least open to anti-racism.


Whether that is true or not, it is atrocious survey design to ask about anti-racist initiatives on a survey specifically designed to assess interest in IPL.



Meh, it’s not some scientific study. I have better things about which to worry.


True. Given how bad the survey design is, they probably won't do any analysis.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL they are going to see if your support for anti-racism correlates with your interest in remaining DL.


What’s the association?


Obviously only racists want IPL.


I think the most vocal IPL parents are the least open to anti-racism.


Whether that is true or not, it is atrocious survey design to ask about anti-racist initiatives on a survey specifically designed to assess interest in IPL.



Meh, it’s not some scientific study. I have better things about which to worry.


True. Given how bad the survey design is, they probably won't do any analysis.



They will a) see how many kids want to come back and b) see what the response is on the anti-racism question and then determine how to schedule it as not to offend the parents who have zero interest in it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL they are going to see if your support for anti-racism correlates with your interest in remaining DL.


What’s the association?


Obviously only racists want IPL.


I think the most vocal IPL parents are the least open to anti-racism.


Whether that is true or not, it is atrocious survey design to ask about anti-racist initiatives on a survey specifically designed to assess interest in IPL.



Meh, it’s not some scientific study. I have better things about which to worry.


True. Given how bad the survey design is, they probably won't do any analysis.


How do you that is what they will do with this information?


They will a) see how many kids want to come back and b) see what the response is on the anti-racism question and then determine how to schedule it as not to offend the parents who have zero interest in it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL they are going to see if your support for anti-racism correlates with your interest in remaining DL.


What’s the association?


Obviously only racists want IPL.


I think the most vocal IPL parents are the least open to anti-racism.


Whether that is true or not, it is atrocious survey design to ask about anti-racist initiatives on a survey specifically designed to assess interest in IPL.



Meh, it’s not some scientific study. I have better things about which to worry.


True. Given how bad the survey design is, they probably won't do any analysis.



They will a) see how many kids want to come back and b) see what the response is on the anti-racism question and then determine how to schedule it as not to offend the parents who have zero interest in it.


How do you know this?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL they are going to see if your support for anti-racism correlates with your interest in remaining DL.


What’s the association?


Obviously only racists want IPL.


I think the most vocal IPL parents are the least open to anti-racism.


Whether that is true or not, it is atrocious survey design to ask about anti-racist initiatives on a survey specifically designed to assess interest in IPL.



Meh, it’s not some scientific study. I have better things about which to worry.


True. Given how bad the survey design is, they probably won't do any analysis.



They will a) see how many kids want to come back and b) see what the response is on the anti-racism question and then determine how to schedule it as not to offend the parents who have zero interest in it.


How do you know this?



The wonderful world of common sense. (Just my opinion.)
Anonymous
Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?



How paranoid are you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?


We’ll never know.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL they are going to see if your support for anti-racism correlates with your interest in remaining DL.


What’s the association?


Obviously only racists want IPL.


lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?



How paranoid are you?


Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?



How paranoid are you?


Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.


Obviously say you are 140% for anti-racist programming.
Anonymous
seriously who is going to say ON A NON-ANONYMOUS SURVEY "meh I don't want my kids to have anti-racist education."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?



How paranoid are you?


Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.



Wow. That is paranoid!
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: