Of course it's logical. The pool of players in the NBA is mostly american (privates) and there are some good players in Euro (public) but not nearly as many playing at the top level. We aren't talking about why but simply the amount coming from each. Yes, my assumption is the pool of private school lacrosse players is way deeper than than public. This means one pool is better than the other. Yes, not every private can make a top club and get minutes but far more do than publics and it's not even close. Yes, there are a few getting D1 offers but they are very small in percentage and are also playing for top clubs. |
His point is someone can collect the very best lacrosse public school players from a given year and compete against the IAC or WCAC. No kidding. He's also claiming the top lacrosse schools in the country aren't somehow making those players better. Wrong. |
Now this makes sense. A player may not be hindered in PS if they are really good and devoting a lot of time and effort to the sport. A good private needs to do the same but gets a lot of added benefit by being around other good players in a good school program. |
Nice comeback Potsie |
| Like with most things, context matters. The original statement was that NOVA kids do not refine raw skills because the don’t go to private school. With the growth of club lacrosse, the evidence is that 20 to 30 public HS kids a year go on to play college lacrosse. I would guess 95% of those play club. It is not a private v public argument |
What am I misreading because that's not what the laughable comment said. Private schools collect talent they do not refine it. Did Bullis refine Jr. and Sr. transfers? Does IMG or the Hill school? Kids play more games in the fall and summer than they do in the spring.
|
|
poorly posted
What am I misreading because that's not what the laughable comment said.
That is flat out incorrect. There is no public school in the Washington Metropolitan area doing what the privates do with regard to more practice and playing. Public school parents are always looking for the exceptions rather than the norm. 20 or 30 out of dozens and dozens of public school rosters doesn't equal the 20 or 30 coming out of Bullis and Landon alone. You can talk about the reasons why but the numbers don't lie and public school apologists are always trying to make it out with the "you're saying I've got a chance" argument. |
You have issues |
DP. Actually you're the one with the issues, PP. The other poster is making very valid points. You're only attacking the poster instead of rebutting the points. Someone's Dad is dancing circles around you, dude. So now I suppose you're gonna tell ME that I have issues. Hhhhmmm. See a pattern? |
| Evergreen lacrosse may want to consider HOCO league in the future. It is a good way to find out the best skill level when scheduling summer tournaments |
And help get kids ready for competition - w some better focus, maybe good things will come from rebranding themselves as Hammers LC |
They do have the basis of a good program. Solid coaching with out dads, outstanding facilities, and Loudoun is a growing base of players. For some reason they better players are still heading to other teams. |
Loudoun is just too far out for it to be a viable option for most people. |
That's where the Cavs practice, and it's viable for them. |
| Top Caliber 2021 had a strong showing at last weekends tournament |