|
|
Well frankly I don't blame her. I wouldn't want to do that shit either. Most of it looks beyond dull and tedious. And she has to have a happy happy smile on her face the whole time. Ugh.
I actually feel bad for her. She married a guy and got stuck with a boring job. I'd hide out having babies too in her position. |
| Well if "celebitchy" says so... |
| MEghan doesn't have kids! |
NP. I'm not the OP but articles on they're being "workshy" are in more substantive places too like Newsweek and the Telegraph. |
THIS I can't believe all the jealousy and hate in here. Wow. |
|
http://www.goodtoknow.co.uk/family/the-queen-and-prince-william-reported-feud-over-kate-middleton-s-royal-workload-4273
I think this is why Meghan endeared herself to the Queen by expressing a massive interest in the work related to be royal. |
Actually I'd say that mindset would have worked if this was 1850. But it'll be 2050 before Kate MAYBE takes the throne. You can't live your life thinking 'I'm going to be Queen so for the first 50 years I'm doing jack squat'. The Queen is 92 and could live to 100. Her mother was 102 when she passed. Charles is as healthy as a horse at 69 just like his father who just had a hip replacement at 97. That's 30 years before she sees a throne. |
This right here. Kate and Meghan's jobs aren't comparable. Kate's first job is to produce the next monarch. (second is to look pretty and be inoffensive) Having babies was Diana's first job too. Diana didn't get into all her social work until the children were older. And I'm trying to remember (I was a young teen then), but I'm not entirely certain the crown was happy about all her involvement. She seemed to be sort of going her own way, being so public with her causes. Anyway, there's no must for Meghan and Harry to have kids. It's fine if they do, but it's not Meghan's #1 job. She needs to be pretty, somewhat inoffensive (she has more latitude than Kate), and otherwise can do what she wants. |
| What work do the Royals do anyways? Cut ribbons and make bland speeches? |
haha, I believe the royalty is mostly entertainment than anything else. Although I find it hard to understand how dressing up and chatting/ making small talk with various people from time to time can be so draining on a woman. It's an easier job than 99% of the population that actually have real work to do. |
Diana didn't start most of that work until her sons were significantly older than Kate's children are now. |
+1. Plus, this is all oddly specific. Do YOU not have a job? Why aren't you focusing on that, or your kids rather than KateStats? |
If you don't produce stats people think you're being superfluous. With numbers her abject lazinesss is crystal clear. |
| This is not a normal SAHM. It's ridiculous to compare. What Kate does is an issue because the monarchy in the UK is increasingly unpopular and rightly or wrongly, the perception that Kate is living an extremely luxurious life on the backs of the British public while not contributing back is hurting the monarchy. |