why do people care if Kate Middleton wants to be a SAHM?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Quite a few Bitter Bettys on here. Go change your Depends and then go out and talk to a real person. |
Anonymous
No one believes this is a different poster. |
Anonymous
|
I think there are two old bats who go around agreeing with each other on various stupid topics.
My money is on Tweedledum and Tweedledee. |
Anonymous
|
Looks like the major newspapers are letting the leashes off! Hey Kate lovers, here's a great report on Her Laziness.
Although the Palace are unwilling to give any precise or exact commitments, sources are suggesting that we will be seeing much, much more of Meghan and Harry over the coming six months than might have been anticipated. A trip to Dublin is apparently in the pipeline, and, possibly a mission to Australia, where the two will be representing the queen as part of their special detail as youth ambassadors for the Commonwealth. It makes an extraordinary contrast to the early years of Kate Middleton’s marriage to Prince William. Kate was barely seen at all for quite a few years after they married seven years ago. Indeed, one of her first moves was to insist that they moved to a remote cottage in a remote corner of Wales, on a small peninsula as far as it is possible to get from any attention. William worked, theoretically, as an air ambulance pilot, although he was hugely criticized for not pulling his weight. No one had any idea what they were up to tucked away in the country, although Kate would periodically take carefully choreographed trips to the local town in which she would be photographed shopping in the supermarket which helped show what an incredibly normal person she was. For many months she was incredibly reluctant to appear even by William’s side, and it was a full six months before she had a solo engagement, standing in for Charles at a private dinner for 30 guests at Clarence House in November 2011. Of course, many observers are suggesting that the reason why Meghan is so much more ready to meet the public in her role as a princess is because she is an actor, most notably in Suits. Her whole life, according to this argument, was just a warm up for this moment, and so it is little surprise she was interview-ready and supremely well prepared for public scrutiny. Indeed, some say Harry shrewdly married a woman who clearly was not averse to fame. But the argument that Meghan is a showbiz native and this therefore makes it unfair to compare the eagerness with which she has embraced her public role compared to Kate deliberately misses a very important fact; Kate and William began dating at university. They first met a full ten years before they got married. It is Meghan who has been thrust dramatically and suddenly into the limelight, not Kate. https://amp.thedailybeast.com/what-meghan-and-harry-can-teach-william-and-kate |
Anonymous
Letter has been sent. Hope she enjoys the message. https://amp.thedailybeast.com/what-meghan-and-harry-can-teach-william-and-kate |
Anonymous
| You're unhinged, pp, just unhinged. |
Anonymous
| The newspaper articles are only picking up an undercurrent of popular sentiment. Maybe Kate can ride on the coattails of Meghan and her work ethic. |
Anonymous
| Y'all are f'ing idiots. Bearing three children to propagate the line IS DOING HER JOB. Being a mother to those children to make sure they end up good people IS THE MOST IMPORTANT JOB for the country. The only reason to get annoyed with royalty is that they exist at all. |
Anonymous
One more reason is that dcum's anti Kate troll thinks she should be married to Will, not Kate. It is like a woman scorned, but without an actual connection or relationship. |
Anonymous
We will see what sort of job she's done in 15-20 years. Another generation of affluenza-afflicted entitlement is not going to be particularly well-loved. A generation of hard workers who try to show their appreciation to their country would be a different story. |
Anonymous
| For all we know, the anti-Kate troll could be from Russia. |
Anonymous
|
Kate is in line to be Queen. She needs to be working more, with some allowances obviously for the fact that she has three young children at home.
There is very little that Kate actually has to "do" at home. They can afford all the staff they need. But the British taxpayers deserve to have working Royals, or the Royals may find themselves out of work. |
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
|
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a20874500/why-kate-middleton-didnt-attend-prince-charles-birthday-garden-party/
The reason why William and Kate weren't at the Garden Party with Harry and Meghan -- William was giving a speech in Manchester Cathedral to commemorate the bombings during the Ariana Grande concert. Kate is on maternity leave, PLUS wanted to let Harry and Meghan have the limelight post-wedding. Kate is a class act. |
Anonymous
|
Wow. Is there more than one nut job obsessed with Kate working? I can’t tell.
It’s funny, but also sad. Mostly funny though. |