why do people care if Kate Middleton wants to be a SAHM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1985 when William was 4 and Harry was one, Charles and Diana did over 500 combined events.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/2506110/prince-charles-did-double-his-sons-work-30yrs-ago-as-wills-and-kate-are-slammed-for-shirking-royal-duties/amp/

Way, way more than William and Kate.

And the Queen's children were mostly raised by nannies while she traveled the world carrying out royal duties. Times are changing, parenting
practices are different now. Three of Elizabeth's children are divorced. William may just be prioritizing a happier family life for himself.

1. Will and Kate also have at least one nanny (nanny Maria) and a full household staff. Additionally, George and Charlotte go to preschool
2. You are assuming that Kate is spending her time not working taking care of her children but you have no idea what she is doing.

Neither do you! Why are you assuming the worst about her, instead of the best?

Never said I did. I do however know a few things about how time works....so if George and Charlotte go to preschool (which it appears that William takes them to) for hours a day and Kate doesn’t have to cook or clean I think I can wonder what she was doing before Louis was born. Oh and also...in addition to her children literally not being at home William barely does more than she does...also freeing up more time.

I think you need to write a strongly worded letter to the both of them; they need to hear your disapproval of their life choices! Because once they know how closely you've been monitoring their private life, I know they'll be mortified. I'm sure they'll think twice about having let you down. Do it soon! Before Kate dares to take too much time at home with her baby!!!

Stop panicking. Nobody is judging you.

Of course they're not. They're judging mean-spirited, bitter people like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1985 when William was 4 and Harry was one, Charles and Diana did over 500 combined events.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/2506110/prince-charles-did-double-his-sons-work-30yrs-ago-as-wills-and-kate-are-slammed-for-shirking-royal-duties/amp/

Way, way more than William and Kate.

And the Queen's children were mostly raised by nannies while she traveled the world carrying out royal duties. Times are changing, parenting
practices are different now. Three of Elizabeth's children are divorced. William may just be prioritizing a happier family life for himself.

1. Will and Kate also have at least one nanny (nanny Maria) and a full household staff. Additionally, George and Charlotte go to preschool
2. You are assuming that Kate is spending her time not working taking care of her children but you have no idea what she is doing.

Neither do you! Why are you assuming the worst about her, instead of the best?

Never said I did. I do however know a few things about how time works....so if George and Charlotte go to preschool (which it appears that William takes them to) for hours a day and Kate doesn’t have to cook or clean I think I can wonder what she was doing before Louis was born. Oh and also...in addition to her children literally not being at home William barely does more than she does...also freeing up more time.

I think you need to write a strongly worded letter to the both of them; they need to hear your disapproval of their life choices! Because once they know how closely you've been monitoring their private life, I know they'll be mortified. I'm sure they'll think twice about having let you down. Do it soon! Before Kate dares to take too much time at home with her baby!!!

Stop panicking. Nobody is judging you.

You should really let Kate know your views, PP. She can then tailor her life choices to please you.

Seriously! I'm sure she'd be mortified to know that some anonymous internet stranger is displeased with the way in which she conducts her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1985 when William was 4 and Harry was one, Charles and Diana did over 500 combined events.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/2506110/prince-charles-did-double-his-sons-work-30yrs-ago-as-wills-and-kate-are-slammed-for-shirking-royal-duties/amp/

Way, way more than William and Kate.

And the Queen's children were mostly raised by nannies while she traveled the world carrying out royal duties. Times are changing, parenting
practices are different now. Three of Elizabeth's children are divorced. William may just be prioritizing a happier family life for himself.

1. Will and Kate also have at least one nanny (nanny Maria) and a full household staff. Additionally, George and Charlotte go to preschool
2. You are assuming that Kate is spending her time not working taking care of her children but you have no idea what she is doing.

Neither do you! Why are you assuming the worst about her, instead of the best?

Never said I did. I do however know a few things about how time works....so if George and Charlotte go to preschool (which it appears that William takes them to) for hours a day and Kate doesn’t have to cook or clean I think I can wonder what she was doing before Louis was born. Oh and also...in addition to her children literally not being at home William barely does more than she does...also freeing up more time.

I think you need to write a strongly worded letter to the both of them; they need to hear your disapproval of their life choices! Because once they know how closely you've been monitoring their private life, I know they'll be mortified. I'm sure they'll think twice about having let you down. Do it soon! Before Kate dares to take too much time at home with her baby!!!

Stop panicking. Nobody is judging you.

You should really let Kate know your views, PP. She can then tailor her life choices to please you.

That was a different person you weirdo. I’m sorry you feel so defensive.

You're the one who seems oddly invested in what Kate does. Touch a nerve?

DP. It is not oddly invested to note there is a public discussion about a public figure. Freaking out about the existence of that public discussion is indeed oddly defensive, however.

Ah, well. The UK can decide what it wants. I am glad it's not my tax dollars going to support their shenanigans, but since it's not, I can just watch the nonsense from afar.

I find it so funny that you would describe a happy, healthy, wholesome family as engaging in "shenanigans" simply because the mom is currently devoting most of her time to raising their children. These people aren't the Kardashians. There are no baby daddies, no alcoholism or drug problems, no partying all night, no issues, period. And yet, you choose the word "shenanigans" to describe their lifestyle. Only here on DCUM do we find such twisted values.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1985 when William was 4 and Harry was one, Charles and Diana did over 500 combined events.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/2506110/prince-charles-did-double-his-sons-work-30yrs-ago-as-wills-and-kate-are-slammed-for-shirking-royal-duties/amp/

Way, way more than William and Kate.

And the Queen's children were mostly raised by nannies while she traveled the world carrying out royal duties. Times are changing, parenting
practices are different now. Three of Elizabeth's children are divorced. William may just be prioritizing a happier family life for himself.

1. Will and Kate also have at least one nanny (nanny Maria) and a full household staff. Additionally, George and Charlotte go to preschool
2. You are assuming that Kate is spending her time not working taking care of her children but you have no idea what she is doing.

Neither do you! Why are you assuming the worst about her, instead of the best?

Never said I did. I do however know a few things about how time works....so if George and Charlotte go to preschool (which it appears that William takes them to) for hours a day and Kate doesn’t have to cook or clean I think I can wonder what she was doing before Louis was born. Oh and also...in addition to her children literally not being at home William barely does more than she does...also freeing up more time.

I think you need to write a strongly worded letter to the both of them; they need to hear your disapproval of their life choices! Because once they know how closely you've been monitoring their private life, I know they'll be mortified. I'm sure they'll think twice about having let you down. Do it soon! Before Kate dares to take too much time at home with her baby!!!

Lol. DP here and I second this. Stop wasting time here and send that letter! Kate must hearken your sage warning or see the monarchy crumble! How very dare you, Kate!

No one believes this is a different poster.

Really? Well I'm the PP who suggested the "strongly worded letter," and I'm not the immediate PP. Who was agreeing with me, btw - which obviously just kills you. Bye bye bitter Betty.

[Anonymous]

Isn't she known as a Duchess of Do-Little?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1985 when William was 4 and Harry was one, Charles and Diana did over 500 combined events.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/2506110/prince-charles-did-double-his-sons-work-30yrs-ago-as-wills-and-kate-are-slammed-for-shirking-royal-duties/amp/

Way, way more than William and Kate.

And the Queen's children were mostly raised by nannies while she traveled the world carrying out royal duties. Times are changing, parenting
practices are different now. Three of Elizabeth's children are divorced. William may just be prioritizing a happier family life for himself.

1. Will and Kate also have at least one nanny (nanny Maria) and a full household staff. Additionally, George and Charlotte go to preschool
2. You are assuming that Kate is spending her time not working taking care of her children but you have no idea what she is doing.

Neither do you! Why are you assuming the worst about her, instead of the best?

Never said I did. I do however know a few things about how time works....so if George and Charlotte go to preschool (which it appears that William takes them to) for hours a day and Kate doesn’t have to cook or clean I think I can wonder what she was doing before Louis was born. Oh and also...in addition to her children literally not being at home William barely does more than she does...also freeing up more time.

I think you need to write a strongly worded letter to the both of them; they need to hear your disapproval of their life choices! Because once they know how closely you've been monitoring their private life, I know they'll be mortified. I'm sure they'll think twice about having let you down. Do it soon! Before Kate dares to take too much time at home with her baby!!!

Stop panicking. Nobody is judging you.

You should really let Kate know your views, PP. She can then tailor her life choices to please you.

That was a different person you weirdo. I’m sorry you feel so defensive.

You're the one who seems oddly invested in what Kate does. Touch a nerve?

DP. It is not oddly invested to note there is a public discussion about a public figure. Freaking out about the existence of that public discussion is indeed oddly defensive, however.

Ah, well. The UK can decide what it wants. I am glad it's not my tax dollars going to support their shenanigans, but since it's not, I can just watch the nonsense from afar.

I find it so funny that you would describe a happy, healthy, wholesome family as engaging in "shenanigans" simply because the mom is currently devoting most of her time to raising their children. These people aren't the Kardashians. There are no baby daddies, no alcoholism or drug problems, no partying all night, no issues, period. And yet, you choose the word "shenanigans" to describe their lifestyle. Only here on DCUM do we find such twisted values.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanityfair.com/style/2017/03/kate-middleton-prince-william-ski-trip/amp

FYI the ski trip was after skipping commonwealth day. He also skipped Charlottes first Easter (which since you are uninformed is significant because of the role of the royal family within the Church of England) to go to his ex gf Jecca’s wedding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1985 when William was 4 and Harry was one, Charles and Diana did over 500 combined events.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/2506110/prince-charles-did-double-his-sons-work-30yrs-ago-as-wills-and-kate-are-slammed-for-shirking-royal-duties/amp/

Way, way more than William and Kate.

And the Queen's children were mostly raised by nannies while she traveled the world carrying out royal duties. Times are changing, parenting
practices are different now. Three of Elizabeth's children are divorced. William may just be prioritizing a happier family life for himself.

1. Will and Kate also have at least one nanny (nanny Maria) and a full household staff. Additionally, George and Charlotte go to preschool
2. You are assuming that Kate is spending her time not working taking care of her children but you have no idea what she is doing.

Neither do you! Why are you assuming the worst about her, instead of the best?

Never said I did. I do however know a few things about how time works....so if George and Charlotte go to preschool (which it appears that William takes them to) for hours a day and Kate doesn’t have to cook or clean I think I can wonder what she was doing before Louis was born. Oh and also...in addition to her children literally not being at home William barely does more than she does...also freeing up more time.

I think you need to write a strongly worded letter to the both of them; they need to hear your disapproval of their life choices! Because once they know how closely you've been monitoring their private life, I know they'll be mortified. I'm sure they'll think twice about having let you down. Do it soon! Before Kate dares to take too much time at home with her baby!!!

Lol. DP here and I second this. Stop wasting time here and send that letter! Kate must hearken your sage warning or see the monarchy crumble! How very dare you, Kate!

No one believes this is a different poster.

Really? Well I'm the PP who suggested the "strongly worded letter," and I'm not the immediate PP. Who was agreeing with me, btw - which obviously just kills you. Bye bye bitter Betty.

Ah well if another anonymous post claims to be a different person then that most solve it! To the Mystery Van!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Y'all are f'ing idiots. Bearing three children to propagate the line IS DOING HER JOB. Being a mother to those children to make sure they end up good people IS THE MOST IMPORTANT JOB for the country. The only reason to get annoyed with royalty is that they exist at all.

One more reason is that dcum's anti Kate troll thinks she should be married to Will, not Kate.

It is like a woman scorned, but without an actual connection or relationship.

In case you are interested in the actual role/duties of working royals: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.thisisinsider.com/what-does-the-royal-family-do-2017-1

But fair point that the bigger issue is that there is a royal family at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1985 when William was 4 and Harry was one, Charles and Diana did over 500 combined events.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/2506110/prince-charles-did-double-his-sons-work-30yrs-ago-as-wills-and-kate-are-slammed-for-shirking-royal-duties/amp/

Way, way more than William and Kate.

And the Queen's children were mostly raised by nannies while she traveled the world carrying out royal duties. Times are changing, parenting
practices are different now. Three of Elizabeth's children are divorced. William may just be prioritizing a happier family life for himself.

1. Will and Kate also have at least one nanny (nanny Maria) and a full household staff. Additionally, George and Charlotte go to preschool
2. You are assuming that Kate is spending her time not working taking care of her children but you have no idea what she is doing.

Neither do you! Why are you assuming the worst about her, instead of the best?

Never said I did. I do however know a few things about how time works....so if George and Charlotte go to preschool (which it appears that William takes them to) for hours a day and Kate doesn’t have to cook or clean I think I can wonder what she was doing before Louis was born. Oh and also...in addition to her children literally not being at home William barely does more than she does...also freeing up more time.

I think you need to write a strongly worded letter to the both of them; they need to hear your disapproval of their life choices! Because once they know how closely you've been monitoring their private life, I know they'll be mortified. I'm sure they'll think twice about having let you down. Do it soon! Before Kate dares to take too much time at home with her baby!!!

Lol. DP here and I second this. Stop wasting time here and send that letter! Kate must hearken your sage warning or see the monarchy crumble! How very dare you, Kate!

No one believes this is a different poster.

Really? Well I'm the PP who suggested the "strongly worded letter," and I'm not the immediate PP. Who was agreeing with me, btw - which obviously just kills you. Bye bye bitter Betty.

Ah well if another anonymous post claims to be a different person then that most solve it! To the Mystery Van!

And I am that immediate PP! I quoted the "Little Britain" How very dare you! Feel free to have Jeff check our IPs if you reallllly think there's just one person who disagrees with you! You are bitter and very strange, and very wrapped up in Kate's choices. And you keep accusing everyone else of being obsessed with her-- no, we don't care what she chooses to do in life. We don't track her working hours.

[Anonymous]

^^ oh, and I was going to call you humorless, but the mystery van comment is pretty funny. Have you ever seen Little Britain?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1985 when William was 4 and Harry was one, Charles and Diana did over 500 combined events.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/2506110/prince-charles-did-double-his-sons-work-30yrs-ago-as-wills-and-kate-are-slammed-for-shirking-royal-duties/amp/

Way, way more than William and Kate.

And the Queen's children were mostly raised by nannies while she traveled the world carrying out royal duties. Times are changing, parenting
practices are different now. Three of Elizabeth's children are divorced. William may just be prioritizing a happier family life for himself.

1. Will and Kate also have at least one nanny (nanny Maria) and a full household staff. Additionally, George and Charlotte go to preschool
2. You are assuming that Kate is spending her time not working taking care of her children but you have no idea what she is doing.

Neither do you! Why are you assuming the worst about her, instead of the best?

Never said I did. I do however know a few things about how time works....so if George and Charlotte go to preschool (which it appears that William takes them to) for hours a day and Kate doesn’t have to cook or clean I think I can wonder what she was doing before Louis was born. Oh and also...in addition to her children literally not being at home William barely does more than she does...also freeing up more time.

I think you need to write a strongly worded letter to the both of them; they need to hear your disapproval of their life choices! Because once they know how closely you've been monitoring their private life, I know they'll be mortified. I'm sure they'll think twice about having let you down. Do it soon! Before Kate dares to take too much time at home with her baby!!!

Stop panicking. Nobody is judging you.

You should really let Kate know your views, PP. She can then tailor her life choices to please you.

That was a different person you weirdo. I’m sorry you feel so defensive.

You're the one who seems oddly invested in what Kate does. Touch a nerve?

DP. It is not oddly invested to note there is a public discussion about a public figure. Freaking out about the existence of that public discussion is indeed oddly defensive, however.

Ah, well. The UK can decide what it wants. I am glad it's not my tax dollars going to support their shenanigans, but since it's not, I can just watch the nonsense from afar.

I find it so funny that you would describe a happy, healthy, wholesome family as engaging in "shenanigans" simply because the mom is currently devoting most of her time to raising their children. These people aren't the Kardashians. There are no baby daddies, no alcoholism or drug problems, no partying all night, no issues, period. And yet, you choose the word "shenanigans" to describe their lifestyle. Only here on DCUM do we find such twisted values.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanityfair.com/style/2017/03/kate-middleton-prince-william-ski-trip/amp

FYI the ski trip was after skipping commonwealth day. He also skipped Charlottes first Easter (which since you are uninformed is significant because of the role of the royal family within the Church of England) to go to his ex gf Jecca’s wedding.

But you're not overly and unhealthily invested in the royal family's business or anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't she known as a Duchess of Do-Little?

Brit here.

Yes the media uses this flattering title for her. It's because she doesn't work much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a20874500/why-kate-middleton-didnt-attend-prince-charles-birthday-garden-party/

The reason why William and Kate weren't at the Garden Party with Harry and Meghan -- William was giving a speech in Manchester Cathedral to commemorate the bombings during the Ariana Grande concert. Kate is on maternity leave, PLUS wanted to let Harry and Meghan have the limelight post-wedding.

Kate is a class act.

Yep. Much in the same way she recycled her outfit at the wedding, so as to eliminate discussion about her, and arrived with the kids and no fanfare. She's doing all she can to let Meghan and Harry have their time in the spotlight. And frankly, she looks quite happy to do so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think there are two old bats who go around agreeing with each other on various stupid topics.

My money is on Tweedledum and Tweedledee.

So that would be you and 9:17.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You're unhinged, pp, just unhinged.

+ 1,000,000
Seriously - who goes around obsessing about and hating on random nice people? So very odd.