The system offers no incentive to educate the best and brightest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congrats, you’ve discovered something we all realized years and years ago.

If you want a meritocratic admissions system, move to China or the UK.

This is an example of just how how stupid people. Chinas system is massively affected by wealth with few from poor areas able to attend the better universities. In the UK they give large preferences to kids from public schools because otherwise all of the spots at top schools would be filled by private school kids. Thanks for highlighting your ignorance.

Starting off this rant about others' stupidity with a childish grammar error is comical.

I'm pretty sure that they nailed it. Quit deflecting.

They didn't. China recently began implementing laws that allow for more rural representation in universities and support before the Gaokao. They also heavily exaggerate the "large preferences" given to public school kids in the UK. Elite UK unis read applications contextually to understand any fundamental barriers in academics and opportunities. It's not a "large" preference, just trying to give them a more equal opportunity.

I beg that you pick up some critical thinking skills, hog.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:China is doing pretty well I think everyone agrees

Says nobody with any intelligence.

Don't be jealous when you buy and use things made in China

We don't buy junk so not to worry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:China is doing pretty well I think everyone agrees

Says nobody with any intelligence.

Don't be jealous when you buy and use things made in China

We don't buy junk so not to worry.

Says some brainwashed junk🤣

[Anonymous]

Your kid is not one of them. So don’t worry about it.

[Anonymous]

Speaking as a country living under explosive debt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:China is doing pretty well I think everyone agrees

Says nobody with any intelligence.

Don't be jealous when you buy and use things made in China

Pretty sure that I'm not jealous.

DP but the U.S. couldn’t manufacture shit these days. The country is almost completely gutted in order to put more dimes in billionaires’s pockets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:China is doing pretty well I think everyone agrees

Says nobody with any intelligence.

Don't be jealous when you buy and use things made in China

We don't buy junk so not to worry.

Right, because you cannot afford. You now spend more time lining up in the Goodwill or doom-scrolling social media

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congrats, you’ve discovered something we all realized years and years ago.

If you want a meritocratic admissions system, move to China or the UK.

This is an example of just how how stupid people. Chinas system is massively affected by wealth with few from poor areas able to attend the better universities. In the UK they give large preferences to kids from public schools because otherwise all of the spots at top schools would be filled by private school kids. Thanks for highlighting your ignorance.

You need to clarify this. In England a public school is what we in the US call a private school.

[Anonymous]

Yeah public schools budget waste gazillions on special ed kids while bright kids are left alone to figure things out. Stinks for the smart but poor kids, but often their cognitive gifts do help them figure things out in the end. Very sub-optimal use of resources for any society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah why not, we are going to import H1B doctors soon.

If you don't like it petition the AMA to allow more american medical schools to educate more students.

It’s cheaper to let other countries educate the doctors and then let us import them here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congrats, you’ve discovered something we all realized years and years ago.

If you want a meritocratic admissions system, move to China or the UK.

This is an example of just how how stupid people. Chinas system is massively affected by wealth with few from poor areas able to attend the better universities. In the UK they give large preferences to kids from public schools because otherwise all of the spots at top schools would be filled by private school kids. Thanks for highlighting your ignorance.

You need to clarify this. In England a public school is what we in the US call a private school.

Needed to reverse it so people here understand the point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is easy to see that no amount of sugarcoating can disguise the lies

Which is why we sent out kid to Oxbridge

I agree. There are quite some sane options out there. [/quote

*1. No woke sh@tz it’s a difficult application process for Americans to understand but worth it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congrats, you’ve discovered something we all realized years and years ago.

If you want a meritocratic admissions system, move to China or the UK.

This is an example of just how how stupid people. Chinas system is massively affected by wealth with few from poor areas able to attend the better universities. In the UK they give large preferences to kids from public schools because otherwise all of the spots at top schools would be filled by private school kids. Thanks for highlighting your ignorance.

Starting off this rant about others' stupidity with a childish grammar error is comical.

I'm pretty sure that they nailed it. Quit deflecting.

They didn't. China recently began implementing laws that allow for more rural representation in universities and support before the Gaokao. They also heavily exaggerate the "large preferences" given to public school kids in the UK. Elite UK unis read applications contextually to understand any fundamental barriers in academics and opportunities. It's not a "large" preference, just trying to give them a more equal opportunity.

I beg that you pick up some critical thinking skills, hog.

That is some serious rationalization mom. Both examples cited sound like DEI to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congrats, you’ve discovered something we all realized years and years ago.

If you want a meritocratic admissions system, move to China or the UK.

This is an example of just how how stupid people. Chinas system is massively affected by wealth with few from poor areas able to attend the better universities. In the UK they give large preferences to kids from public schools because otherwise all of the spots at top schools would be filled by private school kids. Thanks for highlighting your ignorance.

The China system is based on a single exam that pretty much all students grind for.
The UK system is also based on performance on levels, exams and personal statement about why you are applying to that particular course of program (i.e. major). And the applicant is committed to that course for the next 3-4 years.
Also, public school means private there and the reverse. (Everything seems upside down there in language usage sometimes)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is easy to see that no amount of sugarcoating can disguise the lies

What lies?