I can’t give you an opinion because there’s a paywall and I don’t have time to read the Nature report. |
Then you missed the pount. The DSM is ever evolving and will very likely change again with all this new research |
I'm the parent of a girl who is generally considered 'higher functioning'-but these levels seem like a box. As I sometimes say 'she's high functioning unless she isn't'. She doesn't seem to fit into any one box 100% of the time. I really do think autism is a spectrum. It seems to be for my child. |
Agree with this. I have been thinking about getting my 8 yr old DD tested but wavering because in many ways she's on track and I don't want to pathologize her "quirkiness." But I worry I could be depriving her of important self knowledge. Having this kind of categorization makes it feel more approachable to me, a way for her to better understand how her brain works instead of a binary choice between autistic and neurotypical. I know the old system also has levels, but they are so vague as to essentially be meaningless. I could see this being more helpful to those diagnosed. |
I am just getting my 13 yo tested. She has had an anxiety dx but I wouldn’t be surprised if adhd or asd were added to that. I realize my big fear about the eval is that she might have asd - and that’s a terrible reason not to get her tested. |
WaPo is 6 months late reporting on this. It was also discussed on DCUM previously. https://www.psychiatrist.com/news/new-autism-study-uncovers-four-biological-subtypes/ https://www.autismspeaks.org/science-news/study-identifies-autism-subtypes |
|
11 pages of previous discussion in July 2025
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/105/1282436.page#30403121 |
Incredibly stupid comment. |
If the DSM changes it will be to tighten the criteria. |
It’s quite literally not. It’s not a disability if you can so completely compensate. That’s why the DSM says the deficits have to show up in multiple settings. |
Are you a licensed psychologist? If you’re not, please stop talking like you are the truthsayer of the DSM. Masking is in fact a deficit behavior that has real long term issues. Just because someone can play the part doesn’t mean they don’t have an underlying disorder. What’s ironic here is so many parents swear by ABA which is literally teaching kids how to mask… and leads to burnout down the line. But they’re no less autistic. In any case PP, if someone has a diagnosis from a licensed practitioner, why do you feel like you can just say “nah, I know better” |
ABA doesn’t teach kids to mask these days. It teaches them skills. |
|
I am seeing the Facebook memes about girls with autism, and I ticked all the boxes when I was younger.
But I am not autistic. It's ludicrous to say I am. If you are a functional adult, you aren’t either. The DSM specifically says that the condition must impact daily living. The categories are a mess and written in a way that people are DXed with ASD when they actually have a genetic condition like Downs or Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Maybe these categories will prove fruitful down the road but there is still a lot of work to do. |
It isn’t just “social quirks”. |
“Functional adult” isn’t the test. Significantly impaired in a basic function is. You can be a functional adult with no friends, for instance. Or a functional adult who regularly changes jobs. Or a functional adult who is unable to go on vacation due to restricted eating patterns. That’s all significant impairment. But I continue to think that the diagnostic criteria are a mess and this study doesn’t shed that much light on it. |