| Just to be clear, that means that prior to gene expression the brain structure would be typical. The gene expression alters brain functioning in some way. |
|
There are always these “groundbreaking” articles about diseases and developmental disorders, but rarely do they actually lead to progress in treating them. This just seems like another headline to me.
My son is level 1. So he is “low support” as far the spectrum goes, but still struggles socially, and gets easily overwhelmed and overstimulated. It doesn’t matter to me what subtype he is. What matters is how to help him in life. |
You could understand your mind without a diagnosis so broad as to be understood by many to be meaningless. |
Who literally thinks it's "meaningless"? Many autistic people and their families can tell you the diagnosis has been very meaningful to them and helped them get the support they need. |
The subtype helps with that! That's why different disorders have different names in the first place! |
So far it just seems like a different way of classifying the developmental differences we’re already well aware of. That’s not groundbreaking. Just seems like more click bait. |
What is important is that they identified biological differences between the groups. This could help establish different diagnoses that are actually consistent. The entire reason they combined Asperger's etc with autism is there was no consistency in how different providers diagnosed people. This could lead to more helpful diagnostic categories. Obviously, a lot more study is needed to get to that point, but this is how science works. |
Paywall isn’t working, hit the headphones and listen to the article |
I think one reason the researchers did this is because autism research was becoming hard to do because so many people diagnosed as autistic were basically indistinguishable from the general population. So having these different categories could help researchers focus on the groups they are interested in to look for therapies/treatments etc. |
The problem is that many adults are insisting on an autism diagnosis because it has some kind of identity benefits/secondary gain, when their actual issues are not autism. |
So nobody actually thinks it's "meaningless", but some people are misusing it according to you. |
My dc was dx as a young child and I'm not myself autistic-but I'm pretty sure this is not accurate |
Yeah it's more palatable to be "high functioning autistic adult" than "person with few friends who isn't particularly likable" (me). |
lol. The other thing is that there are autism characteristics that are subclinical but people want a diagnosis to get the secondary benefits of it. At the end of the day, autism seems like one of the few things where it has to be an all-encompassing identity instead of just being a condition you have. Like I have legit generalized anxiety but I don’t call myself “an anxious” or seek to see everything through that lens. instead I try to cope with it (and take medication that helps it go away). |
Anxiety is a treatable condition. You can provide supports for autism but you can't make an autistic person not autistic (though a small percentage of autistic kids go on to not qualify for the diagnosis as adults) |