Yeah that’s exactly what I mean. I will always be predisposed to anxiety and medication is only so effective. It’s genetic and I have passed it down to my kid. But nobody is telling me that being “an anxious” is my immutable self. |
Because you can treat your anxiety and have it not impact your life. Autistic people don't stop being impacted by their autism because they have supports. |
That’s not true at all. I wish it could disappear but I will always have it and it corresponds to a certain way my brain interprets events (and sometimes just spontaneously generates). As we start diagnosing more and more very mild cases of autism it absolutely becomes something more like a personality or way of being in the world. But people want to make it their whole identity. |
Everyone worries, what matters is how you respond to it. Worries that don't limit your life are not anxiety. |
Of course. Not sure what your point is. |
You're conflating worries with anxiety. You can treat your anxiety and have it not impact your life. It is not impairing you. An autistic person will always have some level of impairment. |
I think their point is that autistic behaviors that don't impair you are not really a problem. I sort of get this. My DD with ASD has some issues that impact her ability to learn and build relationships. But she has others that would just be deemed "quirky" by most people. Like some of her repetitive behaviors are not even noticeable to other people and don't impair her ability to live a normal life. If her therapy successfully addressed the communication and rigidity issues to the point where she can have a job and form relationships, which I think is very possible, there's no reason for her autism to be her central identity. |
I am the PP No my point is that autism is fundamentally different from anxiety. Anxiety is treatable. Autism is a disability that requires ongoing supports. |
Really? Because a lot of people got through life and only found out they had autism when their child got diagnosed. Was the parent really “impaired” if they didn’t even know? I don’t know anyone who doesn’t have som issue or another. The term neurodivergent is becoming completely meaningless. Neuro diverse compared to what? Who exactly is the baseline not diverse? |
The vast majority of people do not have autism or suspect it in themselves. I have a child with confirmed autism. I don't know if I would qualify for a diagnosis but I can point to several ways in which the way my brain works limits my life in meaningful ways. Just because a disability is not visible to you as an outsider does not mean it does not exist. |
Maybe not autism but they may be alcoholics, have body dysmorphia, eating disorders, depression, and a host of other issues. Is that who we are comparing the neuro diverse to? Seems like they all belong under the same neurodivergent umbrella so that there are more people under the umbrella than not. |
No, substance use disorders, depression, anxiety are not considered "neurodivergence" which is itself not a clinical term in the DSM. |
But a whole lot of people have “ways their brain works to limit their life”. That’s a very vague definition. What exactly does that even mean? |
But we’re talking about a limited life. Who decided that’s the qualifier? |
Those conditions are treatable. Of course, they can be disabling if untreated or ineffectively treated. |