Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Equating ICE to Nuremberg is a false equivalency. |
supreme court disagrees with this assertion. just sayin' |
maybe not at the moment, but soon enough... |
Im not sure what to do about people who have been residing here undocumented or on temporary protected status who overstayed visas or who were undocumented. But you need to consider there have been people who have been waiting over 20 years to legally migrate through family reunification. That is how long the waiting list is to sponsor certain types of relatives in order for them to legally migrate. Their family members are upset they played by the rules and people cut in front of them, many from their own countries. Then once you say okay if you make it here 20 years you can stay, it encourages more undocumented migrants who then will wait 20 years to legally stay. What absolutely would help would be for law enforcement to communicate with ice and not release people with convictions. ICE often goes to the last know address of a criminal alien then can legally ask for id’s from everyone in the apartment. So sometimes no one remotely related still lives there or it is a relative with no arrests or convictions then they get carted away. |
True, our trials will take place in a different city. |
+1 not even close |
You need to visit Auschwitz and Nuremburg |
Where were you when Obama was president and had Tom Homan rounding up so many illegal immigrants he was called the Deporter in Chief. Thought so… |
I was a Fed. I swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and I quit my job in May because they turned the actual day to day work to crap, but also because I knew I would shortly be having to do things that did not uphold the Constitution. Any real federal worker will tell you: we are nobody’s politicized shock troops. What these guys are up to is not rank-and-file “federal worker” business. Also they are kidnapping US citizens off the streets in these “actions” so IDK how you are making sense of that. Regrettable error? Pretending it’s not happening, actually? What is your take that makes this tolerable? |
Lmao. Look, if you are equating these two scenarios you are too far behind to help. |
Maybe you should pick up a book. https://www.auschwitz.org/en/history/ “The direct reason for the establishment of the camp was the fact that mass arrests of Poles were increasing beyond the capacity of existing "local" prisons. The first transport of Poles reached KL Auschwitz from Tarnów prison on June 14, 1940. Initially, Auschwitz was to be one more concentration camp of the type that the Nazis had been setting up since the early 1930s. It functioned in this role throughout its existence, even when, beginning in 1942, it also became the largest of the extermination centers where the "Endlösung der Judenfrage" (the final solution to the Jewish question - the Nazi plan to murder European Jews) was carried out.” |
You wish. But this kind of talk will force people to 1) not vote a democrat again, or 2) if a democrat does win, go to war. |
I am 100% in favor of this common-sense measure. Why would anyone be opposed to this? |
Just keep telling yourself that. It’s your story and you are sticking to it. No respectable citizen would agree to this job, it’s despicable how they conduct themselves. No need to act like animals. |
That there's no response to this is telling. Republicans, deep down you know what they are doing crosses some lines. |