Elrich Leads MoCo CE Polls by Large Margin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Elrich beat Blair in the last primary by fewer than 100 votes.

I'm going to vote Blair. I dont' want Elrich for sure, and Hucker and Riemer seem similar though perhaps with slightly better management competence. Blair is a somewhat unknown, but I'm willing to take that risk.

Except.. I'm a registered independent so I guess I"ll have to wait until the general once the elction is alredy effectively decided.

There is no such thing as “registered independent” in Maryland. Nice try though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

I'm voting against Hans because we need more housing and all his housing policies have done for 12 years is cause a housing crisis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.

What’s it like to care more about your property value than the lives of poor people?

Can you explain? It’s a foreign concept to me.

It’s curious that if Thrive is so instrumental to help poor people then why is not a single Thrive proponent proposing to tax cuts? Because of course if we pass Thrive we won’t need to fund all of these social programs, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.

Jawando's ZTA was reasonable. Increase density near transit. Makes perfect sense and didn't draw much opposition. Riemer's amendment was not reasonable and, like Thrive, drew fierce opposition. It's almost like he's trying to poison the conversation. Or maybe he's just not very smart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

I'm voting against Hans because we need more housing and all his housing policies have done for 12 years is cause a housing crisis.

Don’t forget that he’s accomplished that while giving tax money directly to enrich developers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

I'm voting against Hans because we need more housing and all his housing policies have done for 12 years is cause a housing crisis.

Don’t forget that he’s accomplished that while giving tax money directly to enrich developers.

That was the icing on the cake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.

What’s it like to care more about your property value than the lives of poor people?

Can you explain? It’s a foreign concept to me.

It’s curious that if Thrive is so instrumental to help poor people then why is not a single Thrive proponent proposing to tax cuts? Because of course if we pass Thrive we won’t need to fund all of these social programs, right?

Tax cuts???? Seriously??l Our tax rates are already pathetically low as it is now. We need tax increases. Big ones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.

What’s it like to care more about your property value than the lives of poor people?

Can you explain? It’s a foreign concept to me.

Who said anything about poor people? It certainly wasn't Riemer. He makes poor people fill out stacks of forms to get meager help while handing developers millions no questions asked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elrich beat Blair in the last primary by fewer than 100 votes.

I'm going to vote Blair. I dont' want Elrich for sure, and Hucker and Riemer seem similar though perhaps with slightly better management competence. Blair is a somewhat unknown, but I'm willing to take that risk.

Except.. I'm a registered independent so I guess I"ll have to wait until the general once the elction is alredy effectively decided.

There is no such thing as “registered independent” in Maryland. Nice try though.

What?

My voter card says Independent.

[Anonymous]

As someone who used to live in MoCo and now lives in Nova, let me ask if there has EVER been a competent MoCo government? Ike Leggett was trash. I lived in SS during the transit center debacle. It seems like the county just insists upon destroying itself with poor leadership

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.

What’s it like to care more about your property value than the lives of poor people?

Can you explain? It’s a foreign concept to me.

It’s curious that if Thrive is so instrumental to help poor people then why is not a single Thrive proponent proposing to tax cuts? Because of course if we pass Thrive we won’t need to fund all of these social programs, right?

Tax cuts???? Seriously??l Our tax rates are already pathetically low as it is now. We need tax increases. Big ones.

Nice try. MC has one of the highest tax rates in the DMV. Not sure why you think tax rates should increase. If anything, MC should decrease them as a means to recruit (or retain) the rich who pay taxes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.

What’s it like to care more about your property value than the lives of poor people?

Can you explain? It’s a foreign concept to me.

It’s curious that if Thrive is so instrumental to help poor people then why is not a single Thrive proponent proposing to tax cuts? Because of course if we pass Thrive we won’t need to fund all of these social programs, right?

Tax cuts???? Seriously??l Our tax rates are already pathetically low as it is now. We need tax increases. Big ones.

Nice try. MC has one of the highest tax rates in the DMV. Not sure why you think tax rates should increase. If anything, MC should decrease them as a means to recruit (or retain) the rich who pay taxes.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/economy/eric-adams-covid-banks/index.html

Please note that the new Mayor of NYC fully understands that, without businesses, and without the rich, NYC has no money to do anything, including funding liberal social programs. MC's political leadership needs to get real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As someone who used to live in MoCo and now lives in Nova, let me ask if there has EVER been a competent MoCo government? Ike Leggett was trash. I lived in SS during the transit center debacle. It seems like the county just insists upon destroying itself with poor leadership

Leggett was far better than what we’ve got now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Elrich beat Blair in the last primary by fewer than 100 votes.

I'm going to vote Blair. I dont' want Elrich for sure, and Hucker and Riemer seem similar though perhaps with slightly better management competence. Blair is a somewhat unknown, but I'm willing to take that risk.

Except.. I'm a registered independent so I guess I"ll have to wait until the general once the elction is alredy effectively decided.

Please change to democrat. I know over 20 who have. Because of this CE election. The only local election that matters here is the primary. Change back later if you’d like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elrich beat Blair in the last primary by fewer than 100 votes.

I'm going to vote Blair. I dont' want Elrich for sure, and Hucker and Riemer seem similar though perhaps with slightly better management competence. Blair is a somewhat unknown, but I'm willing to take that risk.

Except.. I'm a registered independent so I guess I"ll have to wait until the general once the elction is alredy effectively decided.

There is no such thing as “registered independent” in Maryland. Nice try though.

What?

My voter card says Independent.

Then you are a member of the “Independent Party”, which I believe was the political party founded by Perot and then went off the deep end. If you are an an actual independent voter in Maryland, your party registration would say “Unaffiliated”.