Elrich Leads MoCo CE Polls by Large Margin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are there any republican contenders?

From the article: “14% of Montgomery’s voters are Republican”

They are asking if there is a Republican contender, someone running, not the amount of voters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are there any republican contenders?

From the article: “14% of Montgomery’s voters are Republican”

They are asking if there is a Republican contender, someone running, not the amount of voters.

The story is about the Democratic primary. They decided to not read the story. And if they read the story or understood the math of party registration, they would know that it is mathematically impossible for there to be a “Republican contender” for county-wide election in Montgomery county.

[Anonymous]

I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.

Ditto.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.

Elrich, Hucker, and Riemer are all the same, IMO. Unethical and self-serving. I don't know about Blair because he is exactly that -- an unknown.

Do I choose the devil I know or the devil I don't?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.

Elrich, Hucker, and Riemer are all the same, IMO. Unethical and self-serving. I don't know about Blair because he is exactly that -- an unknown.

Do I choose the devil I know or the devil I don't?

Hans is definitely different. He's a YIMBY extremist, the other two are more moderate on development.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.

Ditto.

+3

I’d rather have 4 more years of Marx Elrich than Hans Riemer anywhere close to levers of power in this county. The quintessential definition of skeazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.

This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.

Elrich, Hucker, and Riemer are all the same, IMO. Unethical and self-serving. I don't know about Blair because he is exactly that -- an unknown.

Do I choose the devil I know or the devil I don't?

Hans is definitely different. He's a YIMBY extremist, the other two are more moderate on development.

He’s actually just a nihilist. He believes in nothing except for his own self-promotion and himself not being accountable for anything.

[Anonymous]

Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker was a complete asshat to the schools and executive staff today at council. It was embarrassing to watch. He’s way more interested in playing gotcha than actually solving problems.

[Anonymous]

Elrich beat Blair in the last primary by fewer than 100 votes.

I'm going to vote Blair. I dont' want Elrich for sure, and Hucker and Riemer seem similar though perhaps with slightly better management competence. Blair is a somewhat unknown, but I'm willing to take that risk.

Except.. I'm a registered independent so I guess I"ll have to wait until the general once the elction is alredy effectively decided.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Elrich beat Blair in the last primary by fewer than 100 votes.

I'm going to vote Blair. I dont' want Elrich for sure, and Hucker and Riemer seem similar though perhaps with slightly better management competence. Blair is a somewhat unknown, but I'm willing to take that risk.

Except.. I'm a registered independent so I guess I"ll have to wait until the general once the elction is alredy effectively decided.

Please don't. I was the person to switched from page 1. If you or I want a voice in the county we must register Democrat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.

Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.

What’s it like to care more about your property value than the lives of poor people?

Can you explain? It’s a foreign concept to me.