08 Girls

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ECNL North Atlantic PI Index
1. PDA Blue (1) 34.81
2. Pipeline ECNL (3) 32.99
3. Penn Fusion (2) 32.92
4. Match Fit (4) 32.32
5. FC Bucks (6) 31.84
6. Maryland United (5) 31.80
7. Bethesda (9) 31.06
8. PDA South (8) 30.75
9. FC Delco (7) 30.32
Average PI Index 32.09

GA Mid Atlantic PI Index
1. SJEB (1) 32.54
2. FCV (2) 32.16
3. Arlington (3) 31.91
4. Metro (4) 30.62
5. Sporting DE (5) 30.51
6. Cedar Stars (6) 29.62
7. Celtic Union (7) 29.49
8. Baltimore Armour (8) 29.24
9. Ukies Black (10) 28.14
10. Penn Classics (9) 28.04
Average PI Index 30.23

ECNL is clearly a much more competitive league for this age group when you compare the number. I didn't add ECNL Mid-Atlantic because there are many more teams and a difference in how many games were played. As for Bethesda and Metro, that seems to be a toss up so there isn't really any point in arguing. Either parent can justify their stance and agree to disagree. I believe this argument was actually about predictions for next year and not the past season. Hopefully some of these GA/ECNL teams meet in some tournaments. Good luck to you both next year.




YSR gives points for the league you play in and first team vs second team. ECNL is given more weight vs GA by YSR. Watch what happens when Arlington switches league. They will magic gain a point or two.


Congrats on posting the dumbest thing that I have read on here today. YSR is based on a nationwide algorithm. ECNL and GA have absolutely nothing to do with it other than that is where the better teams play. LOL. Teams are given a rating at the U10 age group and a PI is given at that point in time and changes over time. The PI is figured through goal differential of opposing teams. This is documented and confirmed through multiple sources.

#DYOR
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:ECNL North Atlantic PI Index
1. PDA Blue (1) 34.81
2. Pipeline ECNL (3) 32.99
3. Penn Fusion (2) 32.92
4. Match Fit (4) 32.32
5. FC Bucks (6) 31.84
6. Maryland United (5) 31.80
7. Bethesda (9) 31.06
8. PDA South (8) 30.75
9. FC Delco (7) 30.32
Average PI Index 32.09

GA Mid Atlantic PI Index
1. SJEB (1) 32.54
2. FCV (2) 32.16
3. Arlington (3) 31.91
4. Metro (4) 30.62
5. Sporting DE (5) 30.51
6. Cedar Stars (6) 29.62
7. Celtic Union (7) 29.49
8. Baltimore Armour (8) 29.24
9. Ukies Black (10) 28.14
10. Penn Classics (9) 28.04
Average PI Index 30.23

ECNL is clearly a much more competitive league for this age group when you compare the number. I didn't add ECNL Mid-Atlantic because there are many more teams and a difference in how many games were played. As for Bethesda and Metro, that seems to be a toss up so there isn't really any point in arguing. Either parent can justify their stance and agree to disagree. I believe this argument was actually about predictions for next year and not the past season. Hopefully some of these GA/ECNL teams meet in some tournaments. Good luck to you both next year.




Nobody is debating Metro’s ranking, what is being debated is Bethesda even being on the list when they are not significantly better than BRYC who properly is off the list.

One would think that having a winning league record in league play would be the lowest possible bar.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And out of 16 games, only 4 of those games was decided by more than a two goal differential. Those losses came from two of the top 3 teams. One of which is a top 5 team in the United States.

Every other game was competitive and close games.


-25 GD.

“Only 4 of those games were decided by more than 2 goals”. That is 25% of your league season. There is not a single stat that demonstrates ANY success within your league. The only way Bethesda has success is punching down and even then they have gone 2-3 against CCL. You didn’t win State Cup as the only ECNL team that participated. Come on man! Those are the facts.

All you have is a patch, that’s it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ECNL North Atlantic PI Index
1. PDA Blue (1) 34.81
2. Pipeline ECNL (3) 32.99
3. Penn Fusion (2) 32.92
4. Match Fit (4) 32.32
5. FC Bucks (6) 31.84
6. Maryland United (5) 31.80
7. Bethesda (9) 31.06
8. PDA South (8) 30.75
9. FC Delco (7) 30.32
Average PI Index 32.09

GA Mid Atlantic PI Index
1. SJEB (1) 32.54
2. FCV (2) 32.16
3. Arlington (3) 31.91
4. Metro (4) 30.62
5. Sporting DE (5) 30.51
6. Cedar Stars (6) 29.62
7. Celtic Union (7) 29.49
8. Baltimore Armour (8) 29.24
9. Ukies Black (10) 28.14
10. Penn Classics (9) 28.04
Average PI Index 30.23

ECNL is clearly a much more competitive league for this age group when you compare the number. I didn't add ECNL Mid-Atlantic because there are many more teams and a difference in how many games were played. As for Bethesda and Metro, that seems to be a toss up so there isn't really any point in arguing. Either parent can justify their stance and agree to disagree. I believe this argument was actually about predictions for next year and not the past season. Hopefully some of these GA/ECNL teams meet in some tournaments. Good luck to you both next year.




Nobody is debating Metro’s ranking, what is being debated is Bethesda even being on the list when they are not significantly better than BRYC who properly is off the list.

One would think that having a winning league record in league play would be the lowest possible bar.


I just laid out the FACTS and you continue to only select what works best for you OPINION. You are ignoring the strength of the League, ignoring wins against other competition, ignoring the results of Loudoun, Mclean, and Arlington. Again, Mclean had pretty much the same record as Mclean. BRYC has not beaten a single decent team.

How can I simplify this for you. Hmmmmmmm. Question, would the Triple AAA Baseball team with the best record beat the worst major league team? Would the best NBA G-league team beat the worst NBA team? You can't just compare league records. They are not relative. Teams need to play each other and I have put the examples before you.

WHY DO KEEP ON IGNORING FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm starting to get very frustrated. This is like playing chess with a pigeon or debating someone with a megaphone.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ECNL North Atlantic PI Index
1. PDA Blue (1) 34.81
2. Pipeline ECNL (3) 32.99
3. Penn Fusion (2) 32.92
4. Match Fit (4) 32.32
5. FC Bucks (6) 31.84
6. Maryland United (5) 31.80
7. Bethesda (9) 31.06
8. PDA South (8) 30.75
9. FC Delco (7) 30.32
Average PI Index 32.09

GA Mid Atlantic PI Index
1. SJEB (1) 32.54
2. FCV (2) 32.16
3. Arlington (3) 31.91
4. Metro (4) 30.62
5. Sporting DE (5) 30.51
6. Cedar Stars (6) 29.62
7. Celtic Union (7) 29.49
8. Baltimore Armour (8) 29.24
9. Ukies Black (10) 28.14
10. Penn Classics (9) 28.04
Average PI Index 30.23

ECNL is clearly a much more competitive league for this age group when you compare the number. I didn't add ECNL Mid-Atlantic because there are many more teams and a difference in how many games were played. As for Bethesda and Metro, that seems to be a toss up so there isn't really any point in arguing. Either parent can justify their stance and agree to disagree. I believe this argument was actually about predictions for next year and not the past season. Hopefully some of these GA/ECNL teams meet in some tournaments. Good luck to you both next year.




Nobody is debating Metro’s ranking, what is being debated is Bethesda even being on the list when they are not significantly better than BRYC who properly is off the list.

One would think that having a winning league record in league play would be the lowest possible bar.


I just laid out the FACTS and you continue to only select what works best for you OPINION. You are ignoring the strength of the League, ignoring wins against other competition, ignoring the results of Loudoun, Mclean, and Arlington. Again, Mclean had pretty much the same record as Mclean. BRYC has not beaten a single decent team.

How can I simplify this for you. Hmmmmmmm. Question, would the Triple AAA Baseball team with the best record beat the worst major league team? Would the best NBA G-league team beat the worst NBA team? You can't just compare league records. They are not relative. Teams need to play each other and I have put the examples before you.

WHY DO KEEP ON IGNORING FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm starting to get very frustrated. This is like playing chess with a pigeon or debating someone with a megaphone.


The strength of the league does not matter if you are not successful in it. If you played in CCL you might not finish first based on your record against Frederick and SYC. You don’t win in league, you didn’t win State Cup and you have lost to teams in significantly “lesser” leagues. Those are the facts that you ignore. Losing 6-0 and 6-1 to PDA doesn’t make you good. PDA dropped 12 goals only on one other team in your division.

The geography of your division does not mean you are a good ECNL team. You are not. If you played in the Mid Atlantic you would still have a losing record.

Pipeline is new to the league and they finished 3rd. They were EDP before, certainly a “lesser” league and they are in 3rd place and even beat PDA.

Facts are, Bethesda is a bad ECNL team.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And out of 16 games, only 4 of those games was decided by more than a two goal differential. Those losses came from two of the top 3 teams. One of which is a top 5 team in the United States.

Every other game was competitive and close games.


-25 GD.

“Only 4 of those games were decided by more than 2 goals”. That is 25% of your league season. There is not a single stat that demonstrates ANY success within your league. The only way Bethesda has success is punching down and even then they have gone 2-3 against CCL. You didn’t win State Cup as the only ECNL team that participated. Come on man! Those are the facts.

All you have is a patch, that’s it.


Idiot. Please do research! All you do is take things out of context. That's it. Your stupid megaphone.

16 of that 25 GD you talk about came in four games. 2 games against PDA the #5 team in the US and 2 games against #34 Pipeline. Take away those four games and you have a -9 GD over 12 games. So the average differential was -0.75 per game.

The top team in 2008 GA isn't even ranked inside the top 50. Penn Fusion is actually rated higher than SJEB. Bethesda lost to Penn Fusion by one goal in each game. Metro lost by a total of 4 goals to SJEB over two games.

Trust me when I say I hope any of these teams play PDA, Pipeline or Penn Fusion in a real game, not scrimmages. Side note, FC Bucks who you like to downplay tied the top Mid-Atlantic GA team SJEB early in the season at a tournament. FC Bucks finished 6th out 9 in North Atlantic. Bethesda's one win, FC Bucks. ECNL vs GA record is 4-2-1 favoring ECNL North Atlantic.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ECNL North Atlantic PI Index
1. PDA Blue (1) 34.81
2. Pipeline ECNL (3) 32.99
3. Penn Fusion (2) 32.92
4. Match Fit (4) 32.32
5. FC Bucks (6) 31.84
6. Maryland United (5) 31.80
7. Bethesda (9) 31.06
8. PDA South (8) 30.75
9. FC Delco (7) 30.32
Average PI Index 32.09

GA Mid Atlantic PI Index
1. SJEB (1) 32.54
2. FCV (2) 32.16
3. Arlington (3) 31.91
4. Metro (4) 30.62
5. Sporting DE (5) 30.51
6. Cedar Stars (6) 29.62
7. Celtic Union (7) 29.49
8. Baltimore Armour (8) 29.24
9. Ukies Black (10) 28.14
10. Penn Classics (9) 28.04
Average PI Index 30.23

ECNL is clearly a much more competitive league for this age group when you compare the number. I didn't add ECNL Mid-Atlantic because there are many more teams and a difference in how many games were played. As for Bethesda and Metro, that seems to be a toss up so there isn't really any point in arguing. Either parent can justify their stance and agree to disagree. I believe this argument was actually about predictions for next year and not the past season. Hopefully some of these GA/ECNL teams meet in some tournaments. Good luck to you both next year.




Nobody is debating Metro’s ranking, what is being debated is Bethesda even being on the list when they are not significantly better than BRYC who properly is off the list.

One would think that having a winning league record in league play would be the lowest possible bar.


I just laid out the FACTS and you continue to only select what works best for you OPINION. You are ignoring the strength of the League, ignoring wins against other competition, ignoring the results of Loudoun, Mclean, and Arlington. Again, Mclean had pretty much the same record as Mclean. BRYC has not beaten a single decent team.

How can I simplify this for you. Hmmmmmmm. Question, would the Triple AAA Baseball team with the best record beat the worst major league team? Would the best NBA G-league team beat the worst NBA team? You can't just compare league records. They are not relative. Teams need to play each other and I have put the examples before you.

WHY DO KEEP ON IGNORING FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm starting to get very frustrated. This is like playing chess with a pigeon or debating someone with a megaphone.


Try winning. If BSC was not in the ECNL you would be 6-7th in the state of Maryland.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ECNL North Atlantic PI Index
1. PDA Blue (1) 34.81
2. Pipeline ECNL (3) 32.99
3. Penn Fusion (2) 32.92
4. Match Fit (4) 32.32
5. FC Bucks (6) 31.84
6. Maryland United (5) 31.80
7. Bethesda (9) 31.06
8. PDA South (8) 30.75
9. FC Delco (7) 30.32
Average PI Index 32.09

GA Mid Atlantic PI Index
1. SJEB (1) 32.54
2. FCV (2) 32.16
3. Arlington (3) 31.91
4. Metro (4) 30.62
5. Sporting DE (5) 30.51
6. Cedar Stars (6) 29.62
7. Celtic Union (7) 29.49
8. Baltimore Armour (8) 29.24
9. Ukies Black (10) 28.14
10. Penn Classics (9) 28.04
Average PI Index 30.23

ECNL is clearly a much more competitive league for this age group when you compare the number. I didn't add ECNL Mid-Atlantic because there are many more teams and a difference in how many games were played. As for Bethesda and Metro, that seems to be a toss up so there isn't really any point in arguing. Either parent can justify their stance and agree to disagree. I believe this argument was actually about predictions for next year and not the past season. Hopefully some of these GA/ECNL teams meet in some tournaments. Good luck to you both next year.




Nobody is debating Metro’s ranking, what is being debated is Bethesda even being on the list when they are not significantly better than BRYC who properly is off the list.

One would think that having a winning league record in league play would be the lowest possible bar.


I just laid out the FACTS and you continue to only select what works best for you OPINION. You are ignoring the strength of the League, ignoring wins against other competition, ignoring the results of Loudoun, Mclean, and Arlington. Again, Mclean had pretty much the same record as Mclean. BRYC has not beaten a single decent team.

How can I simplify this for you. Hmmmmmmm. Question, would the Triple AAA Baseball team with the best record beat the worst major league team? Would the best NBA G-league team beat the worst NBA team? You can't just compare league records. They are not relative. Teams need to play each other and I have put the examples before you.

WHY DO KEEP ON IGNORING FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm starting to get very frustrated. This is like playing chess with a pigeon or debating someone with a megaphone.


No NBA team would ever lose to a lower league team. No NFL team would ever lose to a college team.

If this is your example then explain Bethesda’s 7 non ECNL team losses.

Explain Pipeline being in a lower league and now finishing 3rd.

The line of demarcation between ECNL and other “lower” leagues is not as wide as you would believe. Do not confuse PDA’s dominance for your own. Their smashing teams does not mean you can simply because you play against them. They killed you by an 11 goal margin. Tie PDA and you have an argument but your performance in ECNL does not separate you from EDP, CCL or even GA as much as you think it does. Nobody is impressed that you lose.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

Facts are, Bethesda is a bad ECNL team.


No, the facts are you have something against Bethesda because you keep ignoring statistics and leave equally "bad" teams out of the conversation. Just fess up. You have a problem with Bethesda Soccer Club.

I have never said we were a good team. I will say we are not a bad team. When you throw around insults at a team of girls, of course I am going to defend them.

The difference between you and me is that you are taking things out of context rather than looking at the complete picture. I am laying out statistics instead of just using a league record. You just brought up Pipeline. Pipeline has been the #1 team in MD for two years now. So is that really a surprise? No, they have beaten us many times now with the exception of once. They are currently a better team. Same with VDA, MD United and FC Virginia. Any other team our lists would likely come down to a goal or two. That is my opinion.

Like I said, you are someone with some type of bone to pick with either Bethesda Soccer Club or the 2008 Bethesda team.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

No NBA team would ever lose to a lower league team. No NFL team would ever lose to a college team.

If this is your example then explain Bethesda’s 7 non ECNL team losses.

Explain Pipeline being in a lower league and now finishing 3rd.

The line of demarcation between ECNL and other “lower” leagues is not as wide as you would believe. Do not confuse PDA’s dominance for your own. Their smashing teams does not mean you can simply because you play against them. They killed you by an 11 goal margin. Tie PDA and you have an argument but your performance in ECNL does not separate you from EDP, CCL or even GA as much as you think it does. Nobody is impressed that you lose.


There is no confusion. Nobody ever said we would smash teams. Quite putting words in my mouth again. And at least have the balls to say what team I am representing instead of your childish antics.

Again, 6 teams on our list would be decided by a game or two.
Anonymous
*goal*
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Facts are, Bethesda is a bad ECNL team.


No, the facts are you have something against Bethesda because you keep ignoring statistics and leave equally "bad" teams out of the conversation. Just fess up. You have a problem with Bethesda Soccer Club.

I have never said we were a good team. I will say we are not a bad team. When you throw around insults at a team of girls, of course I am going to defend them.

The difference between you and me is that you are taking things out of context rather than looking at the complete picture. I am laying out statistics instead of just using a league record. You just brought up Pipeline. Pipeline has been the #1 team in MD for two years now. So is that really a surprise? No, they have beaten us many times now with the exception of once. They are currently a better team. Same with VDA, MD United and FC Virginia. Any other team our lists would likely come down to a goal or two. That is my opinion.

Like I said, you are someone with some type of bone to pick with either Bethesda Soccer Club or the 2008 Bethesda team.


I said they are bad ECNL team. Facts, not insults. If BRYC isn’t on the list then Bethesda does not belong on it either.

Being a last place ECNL is worth not winning State Cup. Facts. Being a last place ECNL team means you lose to CCL teams 3 times. Facts. Being a bad ECNL team simply means you are a good CCL team. Facts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Facts are, Bethesda is a bad ECNL team.


No, the facts are you have something against Bethesda because you keep ignoring statistics and leave equally "bad" teams out of the conversation. Just fess up. You have a problem with Bethesda Soccer Club.

I have never said we were a good team. I will say we are not a bad team. When you throw around insults at a team of girls, of course I am going to defend them.

The difference between you and me is that you are taking things out of context rather than looking at the complete picture. I am laying out statistics instead of just using a league record. You just brought up Pipeline. Pipeline has been the #1 team in MD for two years now. So is that really a surprise? No, they have beaten us many times now with the exception of once. They are currently a better team. Same with VDA, MD United and FC Virginia. Any other team our lists would likely come down to a goal or two. That is my opinion.

Like I said, you are someone with some type of bone to pick with either Bethesda Soccer Club or the 2008 Bethesda team.


They have a bone to pick with you. The poster said bad ECNL team. You can get mad and blame the posters but it’s your record that says you are a bad ECNL team. Win games.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ECNL North Atlantic PI Index
1. PDA Blue (1) 34.81
2. Pipeline ECNL (3) 32.99
3. Penn Fusion (2) 32.92
4. Match Fit (4) 32.32
5. FC Bucks (6) 31.84
6. Maryland United (5) 31.80
7. Bethesda (9) 31.06
8. PDA South (8) 30.75
9. FC Delco (7) 30.32
Average PI Index 32.09

GA Mid Atlantic PI Index
1. SJEB (1) 32.54
2. FCV (2) 32.16
3. Arlington (3) 31.91
4. Metro (4) 30.62
5. Sporting DE (5) 30.51
6. Cedar Stars (6) 29.62
7. Celtic Union (7) 29.49
8. Baltimore Armour (8) 29.24
9. Ukies Black (10) 28.14
10. Penn Classics (9) 28.04
Average PI Index 30.23

ECNL is clearly a much more competitive league for this age group when you compare the number. I didn't add ECNL Mid-Atlantic because there are many more teams and a difference in how many games were played. As for Bethesda and Metro, that seems to be a toss up so there isn't really any point in arguing. Either parent can justify their stance and agree to disagree. I believe this argument was actually about predictions for next year and not the past season. Hopefully some of these GA/ECNL teams meet in some tournaments. Good luck to you both next year.




YSR gives points for the league you play in and first team vs second team. ECNL is given more weight vs GA by YSR. Watch what happens when Arlington switches league. They will magic gain a point or two.


Congrats on posting the dumbest thing that I have read on here today. YSR is based on a nationwide algorithm. ECNL and GA have absolutely nothing to do with it other than that is where the better teams play. LOL. Teams are given a rating at the U10 age group and a PI is given at that point in time and changes over time. The PI is figured through goal differential of opposing teams. This is documented and confirmed through multiple sources.

#DYOR


You actually do not know what you are posting. They weight the leagues like they weight the tournament and brackets the teams play in. You might want to do a little research before showing your ignorance.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ECNL North Atlantic PI Index
1. PDA Blue (1) 34.81
2. Pipeline ECNL (3) 32.99
3. Penn Fusion (2) 32.92
4. Match Fit (4) 32.32
5. FC Bucks (6) 31.84
6. Maryland United (5) 31.80
7. Bethesda (9) 31.06
8. PDA South (8) 30.75
9. FC Delco (7) 30.32
Average PI Index 32.09

GA Mid Atlantic PI Index
1. SJEB (1) 32.54
2. FCV (2) 32.16
3. Arlington (3) 31.91
4. Metro (4) 30.62
5. Sporting DE (5) 30.51
6. Cedar Stars (6) 29.62
7. Celtic Union (7) 29.49
8. Baltimore Armour (8) 29.24
9. Ukies Black (10) 28.14
10. Penn Classics (9) 28.04
Average PI Index 30.23

ECNL is clearly a much more competitive league for this age group when you compare the number. I didn't add ECNL Mid-Atlantic because there are many more teams and a difference in how many games were played. As for Bethesda and Metro, that seems to be a toss up so there isn't really any point in arguing. Either parent can justify their stance and agree to disagree. I believe this argument was actually about predictions for next year and not the past season. Hopefully some of these GA/ECNL teams meet in some tournaments. Good luck to you both next year.




YSR gives points for the league you play in and first team vs second team. ECNL is given more weight vs GA by YSR. Watch what happens when Arlington switches league. They will magic gain a point or two.


Congrats on posting the dumbest thing that I have read on here today. YSR is based on a nationwide algorithm. ECNL and GA have absolutely nothing to do with it other than that is where the better teams play. LOL. Teams are given a rating at the U10 age group and a PI is given at that point in time and changes over time. The PI is figured through goal differential of opposing teams. This is documented and confirmed through multiple sources.

#DYOR


You actually do not know what you are posting. They weight the leagues like they weight the tournament and brackets the teams play in. You might want to do a little research before showing your ignorance.


You are talking about GotSoccer points. YSR does not weight anything. Only clueless people look at GotSoccer points.
Forum Index » Soccer
Go to: