Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bill Bennett said Ford is a troubled person, and that something awful must have happened in her life.
If she estranged from her parents?

Yeah - a sexual assault -that’s what happened to her.

+1 why isn’t Bill Bennett asking why Kavanaugh is so troubled that he had to attack so many women?

"Whatever it takes." -Chuckie Schummucker

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, folks.

I don't like Kavanaugh. But it's just a hard fact of life that accusations without evidence about events from 35+ years ago are unlikely to succeed -- and will draw a backlash.

Typical male response.

No. It’s just realistic. Doesn’t mean it’s right.

-male Democrat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Christine Blasey Ford said she's not sure who paid for the lie detector test she took in August. Rachel Mitchell, who's asking questions for the Senate Republicans on the committee, asked her about it:

Mitchell: Did you pay for the polygraph yourself?

Ford: I don’t think so.

Mitchell: Do you know who did?

Ford: Not yet, no.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/kavanaugh-ford-sexual-assault-hearing/h_a265278e0752d4b7cb72476b8afd46fe

She also said she has had to move twice since then.

[Anonymous]

Dianne Feinstein: "Believe me, my staff did not leak Christine Blasey Ford's letter to the press"
So we're supposed to believe the word of a person who employed a Chinese spy, tweeted confidential docs under influence of cough syrup, but not a judge with an impeccable record?

This was also the same person whose lead staffer was Daniel Jones who paid Fusion GPS $50 million to continue investigating Trump after election. And, this same DiFi leaked the transcript of Glenn Simpson testimony.

I believe Kavanaugh.
I don’t believe Feinstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, folks.

I don't like Kavanaugh. But it's just a hard fact of life that accusations without evidence about events from 35+ years ago are unlikely to succeed -- and will draw a backlash.

+1,000,000
It's called karma.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dianne Feinstein: "Believe me, my staff did not leak Christine Blasey Ford's letter to the press"
So we're supposed to believe the word of a person who employed a Chinese spy, tweeted confidential docs under influence of cough syrup, but not a judge with an impeccable record?

This was also the same person whose lead staffer was Daniel Jones who paid Fusion GPS $50 million to continue investigating Trump after election. And, this same DiFi leaked the transcript of Glenn Simpson testimony.

I believe Kavanaugh.
I don’t believe Feinstein.

Yes we know if it’s a woman....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dianne Feinstein: "Believe me, my staff did not leak Christine Blasey Ford's letter to the press"
So we're supposed to believe the word of a person who employed a Chinese spy, tweeted confidential docs under influence of cough syrup, but not a judge with an impeccable record?

This was also the same person whose lead staffer was Daniel Jones who paid Fusion GPS $50 million to continue investigating Trump after election. And, this same DiFi leaked the transcript of Glenn Simpson testimony.

I believe Kavanaugh.
I don’t believe Feinstein.

Yes we know if it’s a woman....

....whose office leaked the letter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he knows he did what Dr Ford said he did, but he didn’t think it was an assault and still doesn’t. In his mind it was just fun and games, totally harmless and maybe even that she wanted it. That’s pretty much what all the entitled assholes were like at my HS.

+1

This is dead on.

Many of these incidents just don't seem like a big deal to the perpetrators. This mentality is common among bullies as well. They often genuinely don't see what they are going as particularly awful and feel like the victim is making a big deal over nothing. Kavanaugh is probably stonewalling because he genuinely feels unfairly vilified over what he regards as mostly harmless youthful hijinx that are being blown out-of-proportion.

Yes, yes, and yes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dianne Feinstein: "Believe me, my staff did not leak Christine Blasey Ford's letter to the press"
So we're supposed to believe the word of a person who employed a Chinese spy, tweeted confidential docs under influence of cough syrup, but not a judge with an impeccable record?

This was also the same person whose lead staffer was Daniel Jones who paid Fusion GPS $50 million to continue investigating Trump after election. And, this same DiFi leaked the transcript of Glenn Simpson testimony.

I believe Kavanaugh.
I don’t believe Feinstein.

Yes we know if it’s a woman....

....whose office leaked the letter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, folks.

I don't like Kavanaugh. But it's just a hard fact of life that accusations without evidence about events from 35+ years ago are unlikely to succeed -- and will draw a backlash.

+1,000,000
It's called karma.

Yep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bill Bennett said Ford is a troubled person, and that something awful must have happened in her life.
If she estranged from her parents?

Why is what Bill Bennett thinks relevant to anything after 1997?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I honestly think Brett has absolutely no memory of his assault. I believe he was black out drunk.

That’s my belief as well. And, that he lied about never having blacked out. Or he might not know he ever blacked out unless someone brought up what happened.

Why do you believe Leland Keyser is refusing to confirm this ever took place? Ford volunteered her as her witness, after all.

She said she didn't remember the party. NOT THE SAME!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Christine Blasey Ford said she's not sure who paid for the lie detector test she took in August. Rachel Mitchell, who's asking questions for the Senate Republicans on the committee, asked her about it:

Mitchell: Did you pay for the polygraph yourself?

Ford: I don’t think so.

Mitchell: Do you know who did?

Ford: Not yet, no.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/kavanaugh-ford-sexual-assault-hearing/h_a265278e0752d4b7cb72476b8afd46fe

She also said she has had to move twice since then.

And?

Polys cost hundreds/thousands. They are not free. She doesn't know "yet" who paid for it?

What does moving have to do with who paid for the poly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, folks.

I don't like Kavanaugh. But it's just a hard fact of life that accusations without evidence about events from 35+ years ago are unlikely to succeed -- and will draw a backlash.

+1,000,000
It's called karma.

Like Pervanaugh is facing after his questions about Clinton-Lewinsky?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he knows he did what Dr Ford said he did, but he didn’t think it was an assault and still doesn’t. In his mind it was just fun and games, totally harmless and maybe even that she wanted it. That’s pretty much what all the entitled assholes were like at my HS.

+1

This is dead on.

Many of these incidents just don't seem like a big deal to the perpetrators. This mentality is common among bullies as well. They often genuinely don't see what they are going as particularly awful and feel like the victim is making a big deal over nothing. Kavanaugh is probably stonewalling because he genuinely feels unfairly vilified over what he regards as mostly harmless youthful hijinx that are being blown out-of-proportion.

Yes, yes, and yes!

Absolutely! Bullies can’t remember who they bullied but victims always remember.