Do you think Megan is expecting again?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Poor Megan, but I'm so proud of her for being honest.

'Meghan told Bradby it’s a “very real thing to be going through behind the scenes” and replied “yes” when asked if it’s “really been a struggle” and she’s “not really ok”.'

I can't get the video to work ugh.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.


She's an actress. This melodrama is not surprising when trying to repair your image and win public sympathy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.


She's an actress. This melodrama is not surprising when trying to repair your image and win public sympathy.

We disagree.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.


She's an actress. This melodrama is not surprising when trying to repair your image and win public sympathy.


She's had public sympathy from day one and there's nothing wrong with her image that the hateful British tabloids and the lazy Cambridges didn't put there.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/prince-william-prince-harry-meghan-markle-overseas-feud

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That's called post-partum flab. Her baby is only 4 months old!


She has tons of money and no excuse for still being so fat.
she is not fat


I agree she is not fat
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thankfully, it seems that Meghan and Harry are a match made in heaven. They like each other and are affectionate and sweet with each other. Reminds me of how affectionate is and how protective my DH was when I was pregnant.

For those women who hate so much coddling - I am glad you all are married to men who do not coddle you. May they continue to not coddle you and not show you any affection at all. You all are really deserving of what you want. Hopefully, over the years they will be less and less affectionate, because you are deserving of the lack of consideration, affection from your DH for the rest of your life. Amen.


Weird post. Why wish ill on others?


Any weirder than the other post bashing MM?


What? Not wishing ill on anybody. These women hate to be coddled or have protective and affectionate husbands. They would feel stifled and stupid and diminished. So wishing that they get exactly what they want from their husbands. Imagine how very miserable these women would be if their husbands coddled them? Here is what they have written on this thread. Think of me as their wish-granting genie. I wish that they get spouses who do what they want done to them...as written on this thread, in their own words...

I would find that smothering.


Still as unprofessional as ever with these two hanging all over each other at work events. It's why people don't take them seriously. And Harry tearing up during a speech? Please. So dramatic.


Really? I find it sexist and demeaning. Being a woman doesn't mean I need help to walk down stairs or step onto a curb. He obviously has the belief that women are weak and fragile and need a man's help to even walk. I would never marry a man who saw women that way.



Wear shoes you can walk in by yourself. You are an adult. Don't feel sorry for my partners. He likes having a wife who is independent and modern enough that she can walk by herself without his help.


DP. Skillful quoting. But yes, it's a weird post to wish ill on those posters.


No take-backs. You don't like husbands who are protective, affectionate and coddle pregnant wives? Don't like a man who gets emotional and teary eyed about being a dad and emphatic about the struggles of SN parents? Well, then you should get the kind of man who is not all of these things for yourself as a husband and certainly as the father of your children.

- Wish granting genie


Hmm, I don’t see those posts as decrying spousal affection. For the most part they express a preference for a particular manner of spousal interaction in public. Maybe you have different preferences, but it doesn’t seem very nice to hope they lose their spouses’ affection outright.


I am not "hoping". I am just granting them their wish as that's what a genie does. And they do not have Harry's brand of spousal affection anyways, remember? They could not stand to be married to an affectionate man who coddles pregnant wife or stands up for them. Ohhh...do you think I should grant an implicit wish that their husbands should not have their backs? That should be interesting with the holiday season approaching and ILs in the mix. Granted!!!
- Genie
Anonymous
I wonder if anyone asks the Queen if she’s ok? Put on your big girl panties and accept that being part of the royal family isn’t all $75,000 dresses and entire boxes at Wimbledon. It’s about serving. Camilla was ruthlessly bullied for years but she didn’t whine like MM.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That's called post-partum flab. Her baby is only 4 months old!


She has tons of money and no excuse for still being so fat.
she is not fat


I agree she is not fat

And even if she was fat it's none of PP's business.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I wonder if anyone asks the Queen if she’s ok? Put on your big girl panties and accept that being part of the royal family isn’t all $75,000 dresses and entire boxes at Wimbledon. It’s about serving. Camilla was ruthlessly bullied for years but she didn’t whine like MM.

You have no idea what Camilla did. I’m pretty sure she would be self-aware enough not to complain about being vilified as a homewrecker even if she was hurting behind the scenes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wonder if anyone asks the Queen if she’s ok? Put on your big girl panties and accept that being part of the royal family isn’t all $75,000 dresses and entire boxes at Wimbledon. It’s about serving. Camilla was ruthlessly bullied for years but she didn’t whine like MM.

You have no idea what Camilla did. I’m pretty sure she would be self-aware enough not to complain about being vilified as a homewrecker even if she was hurting behind the scenes.


PP has no idea what Camilla did, but you do?

Lol.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.


She's an actress. This melodrama is not surprising when trying to repair your image and win public sympathy.


I agree, but why is she trying to repair her image? What did she do?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That's called post-partum flab. Her baby is only 4 months old!


She has tons of money and no excuse for still being so fat.
she is not fat


I agree she is not fat


+3 She's back in her pre-baby clothes just a little larger in the waist and stomach, which photos very much exaggerate. I guarantee you if seen in person noone would consider her anything other than slim.
Anonymous
Let’s not forget that Meghan jetted off in a private jet across the Atlantic to see her friend play tennis after the baby was born. To the world this was an excessive thing to do (on top of her lavish baby shower she also jetted off for in NYC), so her crying about her life being so hard as a newly wed and having a newborn has fallen on deaf ears. She is so clueless. She still doesn’t get it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.


She’s acting. It’s a PR spin in an attempt to control the well deserved negativity in the press. Americans might lap this us, but he Brits and most in Europe don’t. Go back to Hollywood.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: