Do you think Megan is expecting again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be. They did say they wanted to have two kids and they probably worry about her age/don't want to go through secondary infertility.

She's definitely much heavier than before she had Archie.

She did not snap back like Queen Kate does.

Kate definitely wins the snap back game!

I actually have so much more respect for women in the public eye who DO NOT make their main goal to "snap back". I think the entire idea that women's bodies are supposed to show NO signs of having grown a baby disgusting. Picking apart a woman's body after giving birth is a sad and sorry past time.

Nope, sorry. She has zero excuse to still look this way when her entire life now revolves around appearances. She has trainers, stylists, nutritionists, dietitians, etc at her disposal. For someone so concerned with her image, it's baffling that she still looks like this so she's either pregnant again or dealing with health issues. Not to mention--she jets off to (non-mandatory) social events all the time without her kid so she clearly has the time to be working on her post-baby body. It's literally her job!

Ouf. So toxic. Her baby is 4 months old. Jesus Christ.

I agree with the previous poster. She has nearly infinite resources at her disposal, including a nanny for the 4 month old.

[Anonymous]

As someone who still hasn't bounced back and my youngest is almost 6 (so no judgment here!), I kind of agree with posters saying it's surprising she still looks this way. She has every resource in the world, used to be a freaking movie star, etc. It's unusual in that circle.

[Anonymous]

I am fairly certain if I had her resources I would have still been 20 pounds overweight at 4 mo PP. I say this because I had enough resources (I had enough money to buy good clean food (and did), I had access to childcare so I could go to the gym (and did...daily!), I had access to enough sleep thanks to DH (and slept!) but honestly my body was not budging. She's also not young! I have had babies at 28, 32, and 36. OMG 36 is a completely different game than 28! Age matters. It will take her time@

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be. They did say they wanted to have two kids and they probably worry about her age/don't want to go through secondary infertility.

She's definitely much heavier than before she had Archie.

She did not snap back like Queen Kate does.

Kate definitely wins the snap back game!

I actually have so much more respect for women in the public eye who DO NOT make their main goal to "snap back". I think the entire idea that women's bodies are supposed to show NO signs of having grown a baby disgusting. Picking apart a woman's body after giving birth is a sad and sorry past time.

Nope, sorry. She has zero excuse to still look this way when her entire life now revolves around appearances. She has trainers, stylists, nutritionists, dietitians, etc at her disposal. For someone so concerned with her image, it's baffling that she still looks like this so she's either pregnant again or dealing with health issues. Not to mention--she jets off to (non-mandatory) social events all the time without her kid so she clearly has the time to be working on her post-baby body. It's literally her job!

She doesn’t owe you a flat stomach. Your sense of entitlement over the shape of her body is disgusting, disturbing, and misogynistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As someone who still hasn't bounced back and my youngest is almost 6 (so no judgment here!), I kind of agree with posters saying it's surprising she still looks this way. She has every resource in the world, used to be a freaking movie star, etc. It's unusual in that circle.

Why are you using a photo of her when she was 7 months pregnant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As someone who still hasn't bounced back and my youngest is almost 6 (so no judgment here!), I kind of agree with posters saying it's surprising she still looks this way. She has every resource in the world, used to be a freaking movie star, etc. It's unusual in that circle.

It this picture postpartum or pregnant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As someone who still hasn't bounced back and my youngest is almost 6 (so no judgment here!), I kind of agree with posters saying it's surprising she still looks this way. She has every resource in the world, used to be a freaking movie star, etc. It's unusual in that circle.

Why are you using a photo of her when she was 7 months pregnant?

Isn't this from India/Pakistan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am fairly certain if I had her resources I would have still been 20 pounds overweight at 4 mo PP. I say this because I had enough resources (I had enough money to buy good clean food (and did), I had access to childcare so I could go to the gym (and did...daily!), I had access to enough sleep thanks to DH (and slept!) but honestly my body was not budging. She's also not young! I have had babies at 28, 32, and 36. OMG 36 is a completely different game than 28! Age matters. It will take her time@

Sad

[Anonymous]

What on earth is that dress? Drapes from her place?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be. They did say they wanted to have two kids and they probably worry about her age/don't want to go through secondary infertility.

She's definitely much heavier than before she had Archie.

She did not snap back like Queen Kate does.

Kate definitely wins the snap back game!

I actually have so much more respect for women in the public eye who DO NOT make their main goal to "snap back". I think the entire idea that women's bodies are supposed to show NO signs of having grown a baby disgusting. Picking apart a woman's body after giving birth is a sad and sorry past time.

Nope, sorry. She has zero excuse to still look this way when her entire life now revolves around appearances. She has trainers, stylists, nutritionists, dietitians, etc at her disposal. For someone so concerned with her image, it's baffling that she still looks like this so she's either pregnant again or dealing with health issues. Not to mention--she jets off to (non-mandatory) social events all the time without her kid so she clearly has the time to be working on her post-baby body. It's literally her job!

She doesn’t owe you a flat stomach. Your sense of entitlement over the shape of her body is disgusting, disturbing, and misogynistic.

+1 Those of you judging her body must not have been loved as children.

[Anonymous]

I think she is pregnant.

Why?

Because she and Harry want a sibling for Archie - sooner the better, she's one of those women who clearly enjoyed their pregnancy, and the above PPs are right - her face/body has changed post-partum but also her hair. She's not doing the Keratin treatments right now IMHO.

I think she's preparing for a new child and not just making sure Archie (whose breastfeeding) isn't exposed to chemicals. I wish them and their new baby well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As someone who still hasn't bounced back and my youngest is almost 6 (so no judgment here!), I kind of agree with posters saying it's surprising she still looks this way. She has every resource in the world, used to be a freaking movie star, etc. It's unusual in that circle.

Why are you using a photo of her when she was 7 months pregnant?

Isn't this from India/Pakistan?

Sorry! I googled the trip and that came up for some reason. Here's one from this week.

[Anonymous]

No, she does not look pregnant to me, but she would be wise to get back on the horse quickly if she wants a second. I would bet money she'll be pregnant again within the next ~6 months.

I actually think she looks pretty good considering how enormous she got during the pregnancy. It's not normal to snap right back but Kate did her part to normalize it, and I'm sure she went to whatever lengths she felt it would take. I don't generally like Meghan or Kate but I give Meghan a bit of kudos if her attitude is at it appears (not focused on getting her pre-preg body back right away).

However, I have to say I did not like her look with the jean jacket. It did not look natural on her at all, those black jeans were not slimming on the hips, and what was with leaving the top button(s) undone so you could see her bra from the side. I think she has looked the best in the maxi dresses and business casual. Her casual look game needs a lot of help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, she does not look pregnant to me, but she would be wise to get back on the horse quickly if she wants a second. I would bet money she'll be pregnant again within the next ~6 months.

I actually think she looks pretty good considering how enormous she got during the pregnancy. It's not normal to snap right back but Kate did her part to normalize it, and I'm sure she went to whatever lengths she felt it would take. I don't generally like Meghan or Kate but I give Meghan a bit of kudos if her attitude is at it appears (not focused on getting her pre-preg body back right away).

However, I have to say I did not like her look with the jean jacket. It did not look natural on her at all, those black jeans were not slimming on the hips, and what was with leaving the top button(s) undone so you could see her bra from the side. I think she has looked the best in the maxi dresses and business casual. Her casual look game needs a lot of help.

I liked it, the jean jacket, for a random reason. Why?

It's an American thing. Meghan has told the world from day one (her wedding) that she is an American and a black/biracial one at that. She's clearly proud of that.

I've never seen a royal wearing jeans of any kind to an engagement and you almost never will.

But sartorially it's used often by politicians and presidents to speak to the masses, to remind them that they're one of them and that if needed - they're ready to work alongside them. She did so beautifully. (And she's wearing a Smart Set shirt to boot).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, she does not look pregnant to me, but she would be wise to get back on the horse quickly if she wants a second. I would bet money she'll be pregnant again within the next ~6 months.

I actually think she looks pretty good considering how enormous she got during the pregnancy. It's not normal to snap right back but Kate did her part to normalize it, and I'm sure she went to whatever lengths she felt it would take. I don't generally like Meghan or Kate but I give Meghan a bit of kudos if her attitude is at it appears (not focused on getting her pre-preg body back right away).

However, I have to say I did not like her look with the jean jacket. It did not look natural on her at all, those black jeans were not slimming on the hips, and what was with leaving the top button(s) undone so you could see her bra from the side. I think she has looked the best in the maxi dresses and business casual. Her casual look game needs a lot of help.

I liked it, the jean jacket, for a random reason. Why?

It's an American thing. Meghan has told the world from day one (her wedding) that she is an American and a black/biracial one at that. She's clearly proud of that.

I've never seen a royal wearing jeans of any kind to an engagement and you almost never will.

But sartorially it's used often by politicians and presidents to speak to the masses, to remind them that they're one of them and that if needed - they're ready to work alongside them. She did so beautifully. (And she's wearing a Smart Set shirt to boot).

i miss obama and his dad jeans

come back!