Do you think Megan is expecting again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's called post-partum flab. Her baby is only 4 months old!

She has tons of money and no excuse for still being so fat.

she is not fat

+1000000
Why do people keep calling her fat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thankfully, it seems that Meghan and Harry are a match made in heaven. They like each other and are affectionate and sweet with each other. Reminds me of how affectionate is and how protective my DH was when I was pregnant.

For those women who hate so much coddling - I am glad you all are married to men who do not coddle you. May they continue to not coddle you and not show you any affection at all. You all are really deserving of what you want. Hopefully, over the years they will be less and less affectionate, because you are deserving of the lack of consideration, affection from your DH for the rest of your life. Amen.

Weird post. Why wish ill on others?

Any weirder than the other post bashing MM?

What? Not wishing ill on anybody. These women hate to be coddled or have protective and affectionate husbands. They would feel stifled and stupid and diminished. So wishing that they get exactly what they want from their husbands. Imagine how very miserable these women would be if their husbands coddled them? Here is what they have written on this thread. Think of me as their wish-granting genie. I wish that they get spouses who do what they want done to them...as written on this thread, in their own words...

I would find that smothering.

Still as unprofessional as ever with these two hanging all over each other at work events. It's why people don't take them seriously. And Harry tearing up during a speech? Please. So dramatic.

Really? I find it sexist and demeaning. Being a woman doesn't mean I need help to walk down stairs or step onto a curb. He obviously has the belief that women are weak and fragile and need a man's help to even walk. I would never marry a man who saw women that way.

Wear shoes you can walk in by yourself. You are an adult. Don't feel sorry for my partners. He likes having a wife who is independent and modern enough that she can walk by herself without his help.

DP. Skillful quoting. But yes, it's a weird post to wish ill on those posters.

No take-backs. You don't like husbands who are protective, affectionate and coddle pregnant wives? Don't like a man who gets emotional and teary eyed about being a dad and emphatic about the struggles of SN parents? Well, then you should get the kind of man who is not all of these things for yourself as a husband and certainly as the father of your children.

- Wish granting genie

Hmm, I don’t see those posts as decrying spousal affection. For the most part they express a preference for a particular manner of spousal interaction in public. Maybe you have different preferences, but it doesn’t seem very nice to hope they lose their spouses’ affection outright.

[Anonymous]

I like the orangish heels with green dress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of both of them. I like Meghan and met her in the past, but the UK monarchy publicity machine operating in the U.S. is in total overdrive.

A - No one cares much about the other royals in the US.

B - I’d much rather follow the BRF than any of those drunks on Housewives or Southern Charm or the Kardashian. More class and more purpose to their lives.

As a UK resident, I love these threads. I think it is hilarious that American fangirls really think the royal family has "class and purpose to their lives" and obsess over them this way. We don't. The days of the monarchy are numbered, and I can't wait for these overprivileged idiots to move out of the public eye.

I suppose they do bring in money from the tourists who are the only ones who really adore them, though.

Meghan is classless, people. She's dim and classless. Harry is also dim. Neither is beloved by the UK media or public, and they are getting immense backlash here. Hopefully they will move the US and you can have them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of both of them. I like Meghan and met her in the past, but the UK monarchy publicity machine operating in the U.S. is in total overdrive.

A - No one cares much about the other royals in the US.

B - I’d much rather follow the BRF than any of those drunks on Housewives or Southern Charm or the Kardashian. More class and more purpose to their lives.

As a UK resident, I love these threads. I think it is hilarious that American fangirls really think the royal family has "class and purpose to their lives" and obsess over them this way. We don't. The days of the monarchy are numbered, and I can't wait for these overprivileged idiots to move out of the public eye.

I suppose they do bring in money from the tourists who are the only ones who really adore them, though.

Meghan is classless, people. She's dim and classless. Harry is also dim. Neither is beloved by the UK media or public, and they are getting immense backlash here. Hopefully they will move the US and you can have them.

Also, "princess" is a much more nuanced term than you people understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of both of them. I like Meghan and met her in the past, but the UK monarchy publicity machine operating in the U.S. is in total overdrive.

A - No one cares much about the other royals in the US.

B - I’d much rather follow the BRF than any of those drunks on Housewives or Southern Charm or the Kardashian. More class and more purpose to their lives.

As a UK resident, I love these threads. I think it is hilarious that American fangirls really think the royal family has "class and purpose to their lives" and obsess over them this way. We don't. The days of the monarchy are numbered, and I can't wait for these overprivileged idiots to move out of the public eye.

I suppose they do bring in money from the tourists who are the only ones who really adore them, though.

Meghan is classless, people. She's dim and classless. Harry is also dim. Neither is beloved by the UK media or public, and they are getting immense backlash here. Hopefully they will move the US and you can have them.

Also, "princess" is a much more nuanced term than you people understand.

I don't see the term princess mentioned here?

And as for neither being beloved...your own government says otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of both of them. I like Meghan and met her in the past, but the UK monarchy publicity machine operating in the U.S. is in total overdrive.

A - No one cares much about the other royals in the US.

B - I’d much rather follow the BRF than any of those drunks on Housewives or Southern Charm or the Kardashian. More class and more purpose to their lives.

As a UK resident, I love these threads. I think it is hilarious that American fangirls really think the royal family has "class and purpose to their lives" and obsess over them this way. We don't. The days of the monarchy are numbered, and I can't wait for these overprivileged idiots to move out of the public eye.

I suppose they do bring in money from the tourists who are the only ones who really adore them, though.

Meghan is classless, people. She's dim and classless. Harry is also dim. Neither is beloved by the UK media or public, and they are getting immense backlash here. Hopefully they will move the US and you can have them.

Also, "princess" is a much more nuanced term than you people understand.

I don't see the term princess mentioned here?

And as for neither being beloved...your own government says otherwise.

1. You are confused about the meaning of the word "ranking." I myself, a non-supporter of the monarchy, can "rank" the royals. I dislike Harry slightly less than I dislike Charles, so Harry goes above Charles for me. I dislike Meghan much more than the Queen, so the Queen goes above Meghan. I still don't respect any of them much, but I dislike some of them less than others. See that works?

2. I see the word "princess" flung around enough on these threads to know that many Americans don't really know what that word means, or don't understand the degrees and nuances. They think it is like a Disney movie.

[Anonymous]

So here’s the thing. I have sympathy for Meghan- pregnancy and parenthood esp the first few months is a mindf*ck. Add to that the media and her family- yikes. Total sympathy.

But if it’s rough and unbearable and she’s very very unhappy, why does Harry just not leave the royal family? Move to CA, do the philanthropic and humanitarian things you want and don’t bother with the British media. Just say this isn’t what you want and leave. If they are as popular as some say here, leave and take all the attention on you on your terms. Enjoy your freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So here’s the thing. I have sympathy for Meghan- pregnancy and parenthood esp the first few months is a mindf*ck. Add to that the media and her family- yikes. Total sympathy.

But if it’s rough and unbearable and she’s very very unhappy, why does Harry just not leave the royal family? Move to CA, do the philanthropic and humanitarian things you want and don’t bother with the British media. Just say this isn’t what you want and leave. If they are as popular as some say here, leave and take all the attention on you on your terms. Enjoy your freedom.

Leaving is a non-starter. Look what happened to Diana, the mother of the future King.

The U.S. would actually be worse as far as a security concern. As a blood Royal he would still be followed everywhere but not able to do a damned thing about the paparazzi because we don't have the privacy laws that the UK and Europe does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So here’s the thing. I have sympathy for Meghan- pregnancy and parenthood esp the first few months is a mindf*ck. Add to that the media and her family- yikes. Total sympathy.

But if it’s rough and unbearable and she’s very very unhappy, why does Harry just not leave the royal family? Move to CA, do the philanthropic and humanitarian things you want and don’t bother with the British media. Just say this isn’t what you want and leave. If they are as popular as some say here, leave and take all the attention on you on your terms. Enjoy your freedom.

Leaving is a non-starter. Look what happened to Diana, the mother of the future King.

The U.S. would actually be worse as far as a security concern. As a blood Royal he would still be followed everywhere but not able to do a damned thing about the paparazzi because we don't have the privacy laws that the UK and Europe does.

The paparazzi aren't Meghan's problem. All she needs to do is stay off the internet and she would be much less unhappy. But she wants to get likes, so she can't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So here’s the thing. I have sympathy for Meghan- pregnancy and parenthood esp the first few months is a mindf*ck. Add to that the media and her family- yikes. Total sympathy.

But if it’s rough and unbearable and she’s very very unhappy, why does Harry just not leave the royal family? Move to CA, do the philanthropic and humanitarian things you want and don’t bother with the British media. Just say this isn’t what you want and leave. If they are as popular as some say here, leave and take all the attention on you on your terms. Enjoy your freedom.

Leaving is a non-starter. Look what happened to Diana, the mother of the future King.

The U.S. would actually be worse as far as a security concern. As a blood Royal he would still be followed everywhere but not able to do a damned thing about the paparazzi because we don't have the privacy laws that the UK and Europe does.

Celebrities in CA go about their business with minimal intrusion unless they call the paps. Or move to NYC or Toronto. And Harry has money as does Meghan. They can pay for bodyguards.

[Anonymous]

Poor Megan, but I'm so proud of her for being honest.

'Meghan told Bradby it’s a “very real thing to be going through behind the scenes” and replied “yes” when asked if it’s “really been a struggle” and she’s “not really ok”.'

https://www.instagram.com/p/B3wpLeRDLS0/?igshid=1ayml1t6sprtw&fbclid=IwAR0AQVkTJZuT3j78tDv9IDtGKnp8uA7KVgRaPofGFx-sAag3BWpfkmIXUbY

[youtube]https://youtu.be/Zo9G91QWMQs?t=37[/youtube]

I can't get the video to work ugh.

[Anonymous]

I'm beginning to think MM is truly a narcissistic psychopath and Harry is not far behind. They end their forgettable African tour with a ridiculously self-absorbed lawsuit and dramatic media plea. After an entire tour where MM wore flowy, frumpy clothes she just happens to show up to an event in a dress that spurns pregnancy speculation the same day Kate and William start their royal tour of Pakistan. And Harry caps it off with a laughable emotional display at said event. They really cannot take it not being all about them. What a perfect match for each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So here’s the thing. I have sympathy for Meghan- pregnancy and parenthood esp the first few months is a mindf*ck. Add to that the media and her family- yikes. Total sympathy.

But if it’s rough and unbearable and she’s very very unhappy, why does Harry just not leave the royal family? Move to CA, do the philanthropic and humanitarian things you want and don’t bother with the British media. Just say this isn’t what you want and leave. If they are as popular as some say here, leave and take all the attention on you on your terms. Enjoy your freedom.

Leaving is a non-starter. Look what happened to Diana, the mother of the future King.

The U.S. would actually be worse as far as a security concern. As a blood Royal he would still be followed everywhere but not able to do a damned thing about the paparazzi because we don't have the privacy laws that the UK and Europe does.

Celebrities in CA go about their business with minimal intrusion unless they call the paps. Or move to NYC or Toronto. And Harry has money as does Meghan. They can pay for bodyguards.

You have no idea how much private security at the level Meghan and Harry would need DAILY to live their lives in any major city or the outskirts of a major city would take.

Why do you think Diana was out there dating billionaires? Why do you think Jackie Kennedy married a billionaire 23 years her senior?

If something happened to Harry, Meghan would need to marry Jeff Bezos to stay safe and have some semblance of a life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm beginning to think MM is truly a narcissistic psychopath and Harry is not far behind. They end their forgettable African tour with a ridiculously self-absorbed lawsuit and dramatic media plea. After an entire tour where MM wore flowy, frumpy clothes she just happens to show up to an event in a dress that spurns pregnancy speculation the same day Kate and William start their royal tour of Pakistan. And Harry caps it off with a laughable emotional display at said event. They really cannot take it not being all about them. What a perfect match for each other.

Also, they're both dim. Which explains some of the above, I believe. Although not all of it.