Do you think Megan is expecting again?

[Anonymous]

“I never thought it would be easy, but I thought it would be fair” - HRH Duchess of Sussex

So did we Meghan. I guess being Americans we were fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not understand why all of her friends who attended her half of a million dollar baby shower are not asking her if she is ok.

And why announce a six week family time away from duties. We don’t even have maternity leave here in the United States much less six weeks paid vacation.

MeAgain Megan is so unroyal. She keeps digging herself and Harry into a bigger hole. She’s a disaster. He shouldn’t have raced to the alter to marry her and taken more time to see how the public would react to her. And I’ve had it with her whining and crying about how hard she has it.

This is a woman who flew off after a baby to see Serena play tennis and she didn’t have to. She attended Wilberton and refused to be photographed, took over a stupid fashion magazine as an editor, and redid her house with taxpayer money. Oh life is so hard for her. Clueless! She wants and thinks she deserves so much so fast. And now Harry is sinking right with her when he was so beloved. They should leave royal,life altogether.

Then should you finally be happy and less bitter?

+1. PP is way too invested in this. Perhaps she is secretly infatuated with Harry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“I never thought it would be easy, but I thought it would be fair” - HRH Duchess of Sussex

So did we Meghan. I guess being Americans we were fools.

Oh please -- we all know life isn't fair.

why cant MM just stop with the drama - things were OK (maybe even better than ok) with the press after the Africa tour and before they decided to sue the press for stuff that happened months before.

She needs to take a lesson from Camilla - who was probably the most hated woman in Britain after Diana died.. .Camilla was relentlessly bullied by the press and IIRC didn't even leave her house (she said she just holed up and read a lot).... she put her head down, did her service to the crown with a smile on her face and with respect for her extraordinarily privileged status and the duty that comes with it. And now look at Camilla - shes pals with the press, and more importantly, people actually like her...

Learn from those that went before you Megan- stop creating drama - it doesn't garner sympathy.... it just makes you look entitled and out of touch

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“I never thought it would be easy, but I thought it would be fair” - HRH Duchess of Sussex

So did we Meghan. I guess being Americans we were fools.

Oh please -- we all know life isn't fair.

why cant MM just stop with the drama - things were OK (maybe even better than ok) with the press after the Africa tour and before they decided to sue the press for stuff that happened months before.

She needs to take a lesson from Camilla - who was probably the most hated woman in Britain after Diana died.. .Camilla was relentlessly bullied by the press and IIRC didn't even leave her house (she said she just holed up and read a lot).... she put her head down, did her service to the crown with a smile on her face and with respect for her extraordinarily privileged status and the duty that comes with it. And now look at Camilla - shes pals with the press, and more importantly, people actually like her...

Learn from those that went before you Megan- stop creating drama - it doesn't garner sympathy.... it just makes you look entitled and out of touch

Things were not ok. Were they supposed to forget the sustained campaign of harassment and lies by the British press/tabloids in the 36 months prior because the press thought they'd punished her into 'showing them Archie'?

If you were stalked by someone daily for three years, would you just roll over because they sent you flowers one day?

Please.

Camilla was in fact the most hated woman in Britain for a decade. You know what happened the day she married Charles?

The press shut up about her and Charles' media team did a massive campaign to clean up her image, even to the point that he's tried to erase Diana's work and achievements off the internet.

Go out and try to find a list of the massive amount of tours Diana did from the time she married until 1996. It's not available. ANYWHERE.

The BRF have tried to erase her, as much as they can of her, that's not youtube video clips (which fortunately we have).

Camilla didn't overcome anything. They paid and threatened the tabloids into silence.

[Anonymous]

I hope Harry gets so much lawsuit money that he can draft a legal campaign to enact 'Meghan's Laws'.

What the British tabloids have done is disgraceful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope Harry gets so much lawsuit money that he can draft a legal campaign to enact 'Meghan's Laws'.

What the British tabloids have done is disgraceful.

Uh, besides printing her letter to her dad, what disgraceful things have they done?

They've written about her texting staff at 5am, which is admittedly unflattering and unkind. They've also posted pics of her, done that guest editor thing, followed her around Africa, etc.

Woe is her.

[Anonymous]

So the way she looks off and then giggles and chokes and then covers her mouth looks down ...those are all acting skills. Seriously, it’s a great performance but performance nonetheless. How do people fall for this???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope Harry gets so much lawsuit money that he can draft a legal campaign to enact 'Meghan's Laws'.

What the British tabloids have done is disgraceful.

Uh, besides printing her letter to her dad, what disgraceful things have they done?

They've written about her texting staff at 5am, which is admittedly unflattering and unkind. They've also posted pics of her, done that guest editor thing, followed her around Africa, etc.

Woe is her.

They've done nothing but print lies, slander, and falsehoods about her.




In addition to hosting a clearly biased double standard.




Prince Harry and Prince William could do the exact same thing a day apart and one would be presented as nefarious and the other enlightened


Princess Eugenie and Duchess Meghan attended the same wedding and both wore black dresses. Look at the headline for one versus the other



It's a sustained campaign to ensure the public would hate her.

[Anonymous]

There's a reason no one trusts the British media or tabloids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.

She’s acting. It’s a PR spin in an attempt to control the well deserved negativity in the press. Americans might lap this us, but he Brits and most in Europe don’t. Go back to Hollywood.

As an American, I see it. i can't stand her.

I think she looks great. I'm not one to rip a woman's body. But she's a B lister who climbed from Suitcase Game Show Gal to duchess. And her acting skills (for whatever they're worth) have at least helped with her image in this role.

Completely agree.

There’s no emotion she can show in front of a camera that I would believe to be true. She’s an actress and very good at spin.

I was also pregnant twice and would never consider myself extremely vulnerable simply because I was pregnant. It’s lije she dragged women back into the ‘50s with that statement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.

She’s acting. It’s a PR spin in an attempt to control the well deserved negativity in the press. Americans might lap this us, but he Brits and most in Europe don’t. Go back to Hollywood.

As an American, I see it. i can't stand her.

I think she looks great. I'm not one to rip a woman's body. But she's a B lister who climbed from Suitcase Game Show Gal to duchess. And her acting skills (for whatever they're worth) have at least helped with her image in this role.

Completely agree.

There’s no emotion she can show in front of a camera that I would believe to be true. She’s an actress and very good at spin.

I was also pregnant twice and would never consider myself extremely vulnerable simply because I was pregnant. It’s lije she dragged women back into the ‘50s with that statement

What? You're kidding right? Meanwhile Kate begged off anything more than lying in her bed for a year at every pregnancy, can't speak in full sentences, and shirks her job as a future Queen preferring to be a 'stay-at-home mom' but MEGHAN is the one dragging people back into the 50s?

Kate Middleton: I Want to Be a Housewife!

https://hollywoodlife.com/2011/05/03/kate-middleton-mom-babies-william-royal-duties/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.

She’s acting. It’s a PR spin in an attempt to control the well deserved negativity in the press. Americans might lap this us, but he Brits and most in Europe don’t. Go back to Hollywood.

As an American, I see it. i can't stand her.

I think she looks great. I'm not one to rip a woman's body. But she's a B lister who climbed from Suitcase Game Show Gal to duchess. And her acting skills (for whatever they're worth) have at least helped with her image in this role.

Completely agree.

There’s no emotion she can show in front of a camera that I would believe to be true. She’s an actress and very good at spin.

I was also pregnant twice and would never consider myself extremely vulnerable simply because I was pregnant. It’s lije she dragged women back into the ‘50s with that statement

What? You're kidding right? Meanwhile Kate begged off anything more than lying in her bed for a year at every pregnancy, can't speak in full sentences, and shirks her job as a future Queen preferring to be a 'stay-at-home mom' but MEGHAN is the one dragging people back into the 50s?

Kate Middleton: I Want to Be a Housewife!

https://hollywoodlife.com/2011/05/03/kate-middleton-mom-babies-william-royal-duties/

Yes be got no problem with women who want to be a stay at home parent. I wish I could, but finances won’t allow it.

I’ve got a huge problem with MM saying pregnancy makes women very vulnerable. Speak for yourself, not for all women. Kate didn’t say all women should stay home. She’s doing what’s right for her and her family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.

She’s acting. It’s a PR spin in an attempt to control the well deserved negativity in the press. Americans might lap this us, but he Brits and most in Europe don’t. Go back to Hollywood.

As an American, I see it. i can't stand her.

I think she looks great. I'm not one to rip a woman's body. But she's a B lister who climbed from Suitcase Game Show Gal to duchess. And her acting skills (for whatever they're worth) have at least helped with her image in this role.

Completely agree.

There’s no emotion she can show in front of a camera that I would believe to be true. She’s an actress and very good at spin.

I was also pregnant twice and would never consider myself extremely vulnerable simply because I was pregnant. It’s lije she dragged women back into the ‘50s with that statement

What? You're kidding right? Meanwhile Kate begged off anything more than lying in her bed for a year at every pregnancy, can't speak in full sentences, and shirks her job as a future Queen preferring to be a 'stay-at-home mom' but MEGHAN is the one dragging people back into the 50s?

Kate Middleton: I Want to Be a Housewife!

https://hollywoodlife.com/2011/05/03/kate-middleton-mom-babies-william-royal-duties/

Yes be got no problem with women who want to be a stay at home parent. I wish I could, but finances won’t allow it.

I’ve got a huge problem with MM saying pregnancy makes women very vulnerable. Speak for yourself, not for all women. Kate didn’t say all women should stay home. She’s doing what’s right for her and her family.

In other words she's like a woman from another century who had no options for education, skills, or goals of a career in life. A 1950s housewife.

But you won't say that will you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope Harry gets so much lawsuit money that he can draft a legal campaign to enact 'Meghan's Laws'.

What the British tabloids have done is disgraceful.

Uh, besides printing her letter to her dad, what disgraceful things have they done?

They've written about her texting staff at 5am, which is admittedly unflattering and unkind. They've also posted pics of her, done that guest editor thing, followed her around Africa, etc.

Woe is her.

They've done nothing but print lies, slander, and falsehoods about her.




In addition to hosting a clearly biased double standard.




Prince Harry and Prince William could do the exact same thing a day apart and one would be presented as nefarious and the other enlightened


Princess Eugenie and Duchess Meghan attended the same wedding and both wore black dresses. Look at the headline for one versus the other



It's a sustained campaign to ensure the public would hate her.

Oh well. Those headlines aren't sueable.

She'll live.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I think she might be: https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-stress-of-being-a-new-mom-not-many-people-have-asked-if-im-okay/

It's a video but there's a shot of her from the side and her little pooch seems too high to be a postpartum pooch, IMO.

Wow, she was actually on the verge of tears or in tears for this entire clip.
If the interviewer had been Katie Couric or Barbara Walters (back in the day) or Ellen, this would have been a 3 hankie event.
Still, so vulnerable.

She seems pretty real here.

She’s acting. It’s a PR spin in an attempt to control the well deserved negativity in the press. Americans might lap this us, but he Brits and most in Europe don’t. Go back to Hollywood.

As an American, I see it. i can't stand her.

I think she looks great. I'm not one to rip a woman's body. But she's a B lister who climbed from Suitcase Game Show Gal to duchess. And her acting skills (for whatever they're worth) have at least helped with her image in this role.

Completely agree.

There’s no emotion she can show in front of a camera that I would believe to be true. She’s an actress and very good at spin.

I was also pregnant twice and would never consider myself extremely vulnerable simply because I was pregnant. It’s lije she dragged women back into the ‘50s with that statement

What? You're kidding right? Meanwhile Kate begged off anything more than lying in her bed for a year at every pregnancy, can't speak in full sentences, and shirks her job as a future Queen preferring to be a 'stay-at-home mom' but MEGHAN is the one dragging people back into the 50s?

Kate Middleton: I Want to Be a Housewife!

https://hollywoodlife.com/2011/05/03/kate-middleton-mom-babies-william-royal-duties/

Yes be got no problem with women who want to be a stay at home parent. I wish I could, but finances won’t allow it.

I’ve got a huge problem with MM saying pregnancy makes women very vulnerable. Speak for yourself, not for all women. Kate didn’t say all women should stay home. She’s doing what’s right for her and her family.

In other words she's like a woman from another century who had no options for education, skills, or goals of a career in life. A 1950s housewife.

But you won't say that will you?

As long as she doesn’t make sweeping generalizations about all women, I don’t care what Kate does at all.

Meghan’s sweeping generalizations about all pregnant women is regressive