US blows up boat said to be carrying drugs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The government just released two survivors of its most recent extrajudicial attack on what they say are drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean. Sounds like they didn’t have any grounds to detain them, and that they were not, in fact, drug traffickers.

No. Sounds like they want them to spread the message back home. FAFO

They don’t need to “spread the message back home” in person. In this day and age, most people have smart phones, even in remote Caribbean hamlets. They can watch the videos for themselves if fishing boats being blown out of the water by the mighty US military. Also, your repeated use of FAFO is getting really boring. Do you have any new phrases you can use?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The government just released two survivors of its most recent extrajudicial attack on what they say are drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean. Sounds like they didn’t have any grounds to detain them, and that they were not, in fact, drug traffickers.

So, not drug traffickers. There is not more of an admission than that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The government just released two survivors of its most recent extrajudicial attack on what they say are drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean. Sounds like they didn’t have any grounds to detain them, and that they were not, in fact, drug traffickers.

No. Sounds like they want them to spread the message back home. FAFO

So you’re saying Trump released terrorists?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The government just released two survivors of its most recent extrajudicial attack on what they say are drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean. Sounds like they didn’t have any grounds to detain them, and that they were not, in fact, drug traffickers.

No. Sounds like they want them to spread the message back home. FAFO

So you’re saying Trump released terrorists?

If he is to believed, yes.

So he either released narco-terrorists or...they are blowing up civilian boats.

Neither is a good look and the latter is in violation of international law, which is why the admiral resigned this week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The government just released two survivors of its most recent extrajudicial attack on what they say are drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean. Sounds like they didn’t have any grounds to detain them, and that they were not, in fact, drug traffickers.

No. Sounds like they want them to spread the message back home. FAFO

No. Trump and republicans would want them killed on camera. Trump and republicans like snuff films. Trump told the navy to kill everyone and orders were refused. Too bad you weren’t there. You could have shot the sailors who refused orders!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The government just released two survivors of its most recent extrajudicial attack on what they say are drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean. Sounds like they didn’t have any grounds to detain them, and that they were not, in fact, drug traffickers.

No. Sounds like they want them to spread the message back home. FAFO

So you’re saying Trump released terrorists?

If he is to believed, yes.

So he either released narco-terrorists or...they are blowing up civilian boats.

Neither is a good look and the latter is in violation of international law, which is why the admiral resigned this week.

They are blowing up civilian boats and murdering people. More than 10% of the Navy's ships and other resources are now in the region.

[Anonymous]

So, turns out they aren’t Venezuelan. Ecuador and Colombia.

[Anonymous]

….and they just blew up #7. Sigh.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, turns out they aren’t Venezuelan. Ecuador and Colombia.

And precious little evidence that they were all in fact drug traffickers.

[Anonymous]

Lying about this in a really clumsy and obvious way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lying about this in a really clumsy and obvious way.
[twitter]https://x.com/defense_civil25/status/1980111916249890951?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/titter]

I don't think this is an official account, but it's hard to know because Hegseth is a pathetic stupid liar, and because so many official White House accounts are that juvenile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lying about this in a really clumsy and obvious way.

It does not matter. This is what Fox and CBS will disseminate.

[Anonymous]

I can't believe the indiscriminate killing of Venezuelans isn't causing more outrage, but I guess it's just another day and yesterday's outrage was the desecration of the White House.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, turns out they aren’t Venezuelan. Ecuador and Colombia.

And precious little evidence that they were all in fact drug traffickers.

Yep, these could’ve been innocent fishermen cruising along in their submarine! Because we all know submarines are the vessel of choice for impoverished third world subsistence fisherman with no money, resources, and just trying to catch enough fish not to starve to death, right?

Or, perhaps it was a Beatles-themed tribute band, and they were voyaging somewhere to make a music video, right? Except the submarine wasn’t painted yellow…..it was painted black. ….. maybe they were doing a fusion-song with Rolling Stones influence?


At any rate, I’m sure these weren’t narco terrorists smuggling drugs and weapons in a submarine…because THAT would be sooooooo cliched, amirite?


It must be some other kind of submarine. It just HAS to. Anything except Trump being right!

https://news.sky.com/story/us-airstrike-destroyed-drug-carrying-submarine-says-trump-as-survivors-repatriated-13453002