Verdict Wednesday!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


I don't think you are making the point you think you are
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Trump is a con man. He conned you too apparently


Don't forget his grifter family. $640M for Javanka and 2B for Jared. Enraging.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is over.





Somebody is living in a fantasy
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is over.




You’re lying.

Start by reviewing the voir dire and go from there. Your convicted felon deserves much more. Like serious prison time for selling our country’s national security secrets and trying to orchestrate a coup.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is over.




How would you know that? Where you there? I doubt it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is [b]over.[/b]



The right wing still runs the “mainstream” media. They get to keep harboring all their delusions and no one will disabuse them.

And that orange traitor will probably never see the inside of a prison cell… but he’ll always be a convict.

My prayers with those jurors, too. May the right wing violence machine just behave themselves for once.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is over.




You’re lying.

Start by reviewing the voir dire and go from there. Your convicted felon deserves much more. Like serious prison time for selling our country’s national security secrets and trying to orchestrate a coup.


DP. Take a breath and stop attacking posters that you agree with. Read more carefully.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is over.




Where do you get your news from? I have read about the tendencies each juror revealed about their political leanings or lack of during voir dire, why haven't you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is over.




You’re lying.

Start by reviewing the voir dire and go from there. Your convicted felon deserves much more. Like serious prison time for selling our country’s national security secrets and trying to orchestrate a coup.


Oh don't worry those trials will be coming down pipelines assuming somebody doesn't become president and pardon themselves. Elections have consequences, folks and this year more than any other year.

If there's any Justice in this world, I hope he just completely bankrupts the rnc. Maybe they would finally own a lesson about throwing money after bad
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is over.




You’re lying.

Start by reviewing the voir dire and go from there. Your convicted felon deserves much more. Like serious prison time for selling our country’s national security secrets and trying to orchestrate a coup.


DP. Take a breath and stop attacking posters that you agree with. Read more carefully.


You are wrong, you need to read more carefully.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is 34 felonies a lot?


Yes, it is. Some numbers for context:

Madoff, 11 counts

Skilling for all of Enron, 28, 19 stuck

Liz Holmes, 11 counts

Paul Manafort for random campaign finance stuff, 18 counts, 8 stuck

Sam Bankman-Fried, 7 counts for all of FTX, illegal campaign finance charges dropped

It’s so blatantly partisan.


Great point, A+ thinking, no notes. Nothing whatsoever was done to screen any of these juries for bias, particularly partisan bias. The defense attorneys were given no chance to disqualify jurors who demonstrated it. No judges ever did this either. Appeals courts never reviewed these matters.

The era of you snowflakes feeling sure that you can make up your own facts and get away with it is over.




You’re lying.

Start by reviewing the voir dire and go from there. Your convicted felon deserves much more. Like serious prison time for selling our country’s national security secrets and trying to orchestrate a coup.


DP. Take a breath and stop attacking posters that you agree with. Read more carefully.


Sarcasm doesn’t always work here because MAGA would seriously believe this!
Anonymous
Despite the fact this won’t be upheld on appeal. Still a watershed moment for our country. The weaponization of the justice system against political opponents.

Democrats taking a page from Russia’s playbook I see. Gross.
Anonymous
Trump was convicted by a jury of his peers in a STATE court.

Learn civics dumb Republicans.

It's a solemn moment for our country. But I'm grateful for justice & the rule of law.
Anonymous
I feel bad for the judge that has to sentence him. In any other circumstance, 34 counts would lead to at least some jail time. I feel like that’s gojng to be really tough for him to do — so impossible to treat him like any other defendant, preferential treatment is almost unavoidable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:34 of 34. Congrats to the prosecution, took a lot of work to get there.


Let's not forget Stormy Daniels. I can't believe a guy named Pecker and a former porn star led to the conviction of a former sitting President.
Those are the people he hangs out with plus Michael Cohen


Yes, shows his true character.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: