It never ceases to amaze me how posters can find things to blame the "gop" for. |
|
| This is why it is important for women to be educated and have options for employment. No doubt Anna feels stuck in this marriage because she has no way to support herself and 7 kids. Who knows what their marriage is like. He may be abusive towards her. Unfortunately women stay in abusive marriages all the time. |
| Okay so let me get this straight- Anna KNEW about the investigation and still went on to have another baby with him! I had sympathy for her but no more |
Yes. I wouldn't be surprised if she hadn't facilitated this entire discovery. At the very least, she must be so relieved to be rid of him. |
Jinger and Jeremy are releasing a book soon. Not a tell all with the info we’d love to hear, but she shared in one of the chapters that her parents would welcome all kinds of families and strangers into the house and often these practically unknown people would spend the night. They were not in the business of protecting their children, that’s for sure! |
| I read that JimBob told everyone his arrest was imminent and not to talk to the media. Can any lawyers here tell the not-lawyers among us how common it is for someone to be given that level of notice and be allowed to turn themselves in? Bc that seems very measured compare to stories I’ve read about door being busted down for crimes that are much more innocuous. |
Why is it so hard to believe that she herself might have been raped? |
In federal cases, it is not uncommon to know indictment is imminent - it’s the when and what exactly it’ll cover that’s the secret |
raped into having more kids?? She has an out. Her brother offered to help her back when the AM scandal came out. She should have protected her daughters but she chose to stay. |
| Why would JimBob be arrested? Sorry, don't know much about this family. Never watched the show. |
If she wanted to get rid of him, she would have divorced him, a long time ago. This will be a long and drawn out case (if he isn't pleading guilty), and he will not be held in custody the entire time. I have no opinion of whether she is a victim or an enabler, but, given their family's history with law enforcement, the media, and political/religious beliefs, there is no way she thinks turning him into the authorities is going to be the best thing for her family. |
Spousal privilege and immunity are two different things. Spousal privilege goes to whether she can be compelled to testify against him, and if she can choose to testify willingly against him him on certain subjects. Immunity goes to whether she can be prosecuted for her own crimes. On the latter, if she turned Josh in upon finding the material and had no role in his crimes, she wouldn't face any criminal culpability. If she in any way participated in his crimes but later confessed it to law enforcement and agreed to help them, she could still be subject to prosecution but may have negotiated some kind of deal in advance, or could be given some amount of leniency by prosecutors for having turned him in. As for spousal privilege, there are two types - spousal witness privilege, and marital communications privilege. Spousal witness privilege means that, as long as they are married, prosecutors cannot compel someone to testify against their spouse in a criminal matter. That privilege belongs to the non-defendant spouse alone, though, and if the non-defendant spouse decided they were willing to testify against the defendant, the defendant can do nothing to stop them as long as they aren't testifying about anything covered by the marital communication privilege. Many states have abolished the spousal witness privilege, though, so I don't know whether that would be available in this case at all. The marital communications privilege basically makes any communications between spouses during a marriage confidential. The privilege belongs to both spouses, so even if a non-defendant spouse wanted to testify about those communications, the would not be permitted to do so unless the defendant spouse agreed to waive the privilege. This privilege continues after divorce. This privilege does not affect a non-defendant's spouse to testify about anything that isn't a communication between the spouses (e.g., what time your spouse came home on a particular day, events or behaviors you witnessed, etc.). |
this cult teaches girls/women that they CANNOT say no to their husbands |
It’s actually very common especially for high profile people (who can’t easily flee) and situations where they’re not worried about the person destroying evidence last minute (think the drug dealer flushing cocaine). |