
Because living well above your means, filing bankruptcy and being unable to pay your bills is usually an indicator of someone who lacks character. Being financially irresponsible is a form of dishonesty. Of course this is on BOTH of them. It silmply reveals she had character flaws. Once I read about the financial problems I wasn’t at all surprised her husband could do something like she did. Normal healthy people don’t live their life like they did. |
It’s not. Of course not. But if you make such horrible and immoral decisions about your finances it’s not that surprising you may also make other immoral choices. |
Also an indicator of someone who lacks character: murdering your wife and two children. Maybe he controlled the finances. |
This x1000. I don't understand what people are missing here. |
Ideally she should have left him. It sounds as though she had friends and family who loved her and she had the freedom to take business trips and had left the kids with him before. I think she knew that he could be a selfish a-hole at times. I think she was adept at painting a rosy picture of her life on Facebook even when things weren't really go too well. They were having marital problems, he was having an affair and she suspected that he was cheating on her. Their finances were a mess.... No way did she think he was going to hurt their children and no way did she think he was going to kill her. She never would have left those babies with him if she thought that he could harm them. |
What people are missing is that most likely there were significant signs this man is a psycho. His finances show that. |
They are so lucky that a White legal citizen who is related by blood and mariiage to them got to murder them. I think it would be terrible if a non-White stranger who was illegal immigrant killed them. Way worse.
So what is the definition of serial killer? 3 murders? |
A serial killer murders multiple people over an extended amount of time A spree killer murders multiple people quickly A family annihilator murders his family, but not others unless they were in the way |
What’s your damage, Heather? Are you trying to make excuses for Mollie Tibberts’ killer? |
Personally I think had she taken some responsibility for the house she lived in with him, for the children she bore with him, for the mortgage, for the household expenses by GETTING A DAMN JOB they wouldn't be where they are now. But living in lala-land and asking for someone else to shoulder all of the financial responsibility for a household of soon-to-be five when it was quite clear they were drowning in debt and growing finance restrictions...well, you get her and her fake facebook life. |
He should have divorced her. But he killed her and his own children - wtf? |
Wow so much hate for a murder victim. Would you want people dancing on your grave like this? |
Yes. Divorce her. Then watch as she hired a lawyer using someone else's money ( usually her dad's or the husband's post-ruling), have to share custody 50/50 or 70/30, need to pay her living expenses for 3 years (so nothing different) and oh...child support for 3 for the next 20 years. Fun times. I get it - murder isn't an answer. But don't act like the alternative was either rosy or pleasant. |
The guy was making 60K. There is only so far that was going to go. Their financial house of cards was coming down on them. No amount of juggling and robbing Peter to pay Paul was going to make it work. Might as well get divorced, take their lumps, figure out custody and go from there. She would have had to get a full time job. They would have had to sell their house. The oldest would have gone to Kindergarten soon. It would have been hard but they would have ALL lived through it which is far preferable to that psycho killing his family. |
yall make me sick. so many mras. |