Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A couple reasons why I think Depp believers aren't posting as often:

- we get called disgusting names on this forum even if we are
dv victims/survivors sharing our point of view

- we're too busy watching both sides of court, not cherry
picking

- things aren’t going well during cross-exam

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A couple reasons why I think Depp believers aren't posting as often:

- we get called disgusting names on this forum even if we are
dv victims/survivors sharing our point of view

- we're too busy watching both sides of court, not cherry
picking

+1

[Anonymous]

Jump in now for Heard’s rebuttal
https://youtu.be/QlTNO3UgAs8

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A couple reasons why I think Depp believers aren't posting as often:

- we get called disgusting names on this forum even if we are
dv victims/survivors sharing our point of view

- we're too busy watching both sides of court, not cherry
picking

That’s not the flex you think it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is the deal with her imitating his outfits? She is a certified psychopath.

Most people wear suits to court, what should she wear in your esteemed opinion?

Her choice of clothing and hair style struck me as quite histrionic myself. She dresses up like she is acting scenes from different time periods - ages of innocence, with adorable little girl braids, little house on prairie style with a shirt buttoned up to the top. An innocent little gale she is. And the 1940s look, same thing.

In reality, she is a drug using millennial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depp’s cross today suggested he already had the black eye before he met up with Heard on the train. But I know you guys don’t pay attention to anything damaging about him during the trial.

Yup and this gem:

Rottenborn reads a Depp text message: “If you want to be with a woman sexually then she is rightfully yours.
Depp: That’s ludicrous
Rottenborn reads another: I need, I want, I take.
Depp: Equally ludicrous.
He’s then shown a text message sent to his personal assistant. Depp claims he didn’t write it and accused Ben Rottenborn of writing it the night before. Rottenborn laughs and assures him that he did not write the text last night since it had long been admitted as evidence.

Is that in the video pp posted from yesterday? Do you know the time stamp? I made it about 18 minutes before I couldn’t deal with his garbage responses anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depp’s cross today suggested he already had the black eye before he met up with Heard on the train. But I know you guys don’t pay attention to anything damaging about him during the trial.

Yup and this gem:

Rottenborn reads a Depp text message: “If you want to be with a woman sexually then she is rightfully yours.
Depp: That’s ludicrous
Rottenborn reads another: I need, I want, I take.
Depp: Equally ludicrous.
He’s then shown a text message sent to his personal assistant. Depp claims he didn’t write it and accused Ben Rottenborn of writing it the night before. Rottenborn laughs and assures him that he did not write the text last night since it had long been admitted as evidence.

Is that in the video pp posted from yesterday? Do you know the time stamp? I made it about 18 minutes before I couldn’t deal with his garbage responses anymore.

Yes the video is on page 170 post 19:34. Start at 18:10 in video for the text messages exchange. Start at 3:10 for the black eye he had in Bangkok before the alleged train incident claiming Amber punched him on the train. 4 photos shown to Depp that his black eye existed prior to train claim. He of course argued about lighting and photoshopped hacks.

So his own legal team produced his own texts and his own, and them he accused defense counsel of having made them up the night before? That’s certifiable.

Defense submitted as evidence.

His legal team produced them in discovery. The copy entered into evidence was Bates numbered from Depp’s production, and Depp’s counsel did not object to their authenticity. He was lying about the texts not being his.

Weird that no one commented about the “incoming” label suggesting he received, rather than sent these. Unless the production came from the assistant’s phone

[Anonymous]

She has so many lies she can't keep them straight!

[Anonymous]

6 hrs left on the clock for Depp’s team and they put Heard back on the stand? There’s NO way her team advised that so she must have insisted on it. Her delusion is real!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jump in now for Heard’s rebuttal
https://youtu.be/QlTNO3UgAs8

Camille is a sophist. Little sorcery stirrer.

[Anonymous]

Not really the topic, but wow did Kate Moss look amazing. Have always thought her face was mesmerizing and she hasn’t changed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:6 hrs left on the clock for Depp’s team and they put Heard back on the stand? There’s NO way her team advised that so she must have insisted on it. Her delusion is real!

She's batshit crazy. I hope the jury see's that. As a survivor of domestic abuse it's horrible she's trying to claim it.

[Anonymous]

this thread would be so much more interesting without the cretins who have to continually insult each other. You guys you're wasting so much energy on that, and it's definitely not falling into the category of "entertainment" for the rest of us.

Just CHILL.

[Anonymous]

Camille had 3 talking points and fell flat on her face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A couple reasons why I think Depp believers aren't posting as often:

- we get called disgusting names on this forum even if we are
dv victims/survivors sharing our point of view

- we're too busy watching both sides of court, not cherry
picking

That’s not the flex you think it is.

I don't try to flex anything in my life lol. I'm not trying to impress anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:6 hrs left on the clock for Depp’s team and they put Heard back on the stand? There’s NO way her team advised that so she must have insisted on it. Her delusion is real!

She's batshit crazy. I hope the jury see's that. As a survivor of domestic abuse it's horrible she's trying to claim it.

Doesn’t actually matter if she’s crazy. I don’t think they proved the op-Ed caused a decline in his career. That’s what is on trial.