MAGA teen bused in from a Catholic school harasses Indigenous People's marcher. Vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

New York Times wrote:
To many black people, Hebrew Israelites are a harmless part of their communities,
said Todd Boyd, a professor of race and pop culture at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles,
one of many cities where the group can be seen working the streets.
More alarming to many African Americans, he said, is ‘seeing a white guy in a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat.’

What in the Wide Wide Worlds of Sports is wrong with the New York Times?

"Seeing a white guy in a 'Make America Great Again' hat" is somehow more alarming than the BHI, a recognized hate group because they "are a harmless part of their communities, [to many black people]." (clauses transposed).

Well, there's a Black professor who just threw all moderate African-Americans under the bus.

Black nationalist hate groups are "harmless" (as opposed to mentally unbalanced and on the do-not-engage-with list), and many black communities accept them?

So, there we have it from the mainstream media.

So let's see if I have this straight:

Black Hebrew Israelites, a hate group: "harmless"
White boy who smirked: death threats and calls for expulsion from school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
MAGA trash automatically invites it's own criticism. Hard to be criticized if you're not actually acting like an a-hole. You should try it sometime.

So you are calling all those kids trash? That’s not true.

It was more of a general statement. All MAGA are trash.

Calling MAGA idiots "trash" <> violence
And I think they're ALL trash, not just the douchebaggy young white kids. White, black, brown, orange.

But keep dishing out the BS like you MAGAs like to do - typical.

Oh, great, so your the broad-minded "Bob's Country Bunker" type who's both prejudiced-and bigoted, but not currently violent
Who boy, that's a tightly wound spring that nobody wants to be near when it pops off.

Calling Johnny Carson as Carnak-the-Magnificent "In your future I see neighbors saying "no officer, he was always so quiet..."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

New York Times wrote:
To many black people, Hebrew Israelites are a harmless part of their communities,
said Todd Boyd, a professor of race and pop culture at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles,
one of many cities where the group can be seen working the streets.
More alarming to many African Americans, he said, is ‘seeing a white guy in a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat.’

What in the Wide Wide Worlds of Sports is wrong with the New York Times?

"Seeing a white guy in a 'Make America Great Again' hat" is somehow more alarming than the BHI, a recognized hate group because they "are a harmless part of their communities, [to many black people]." (clauses transposed).

Well, there's a Black professor who just threw all moderate African-Americans under the bus.

Black nationalist hate groups are "harmless" (as opposed to mentally unbalanced and on the do-not-engage-with list), and many black communities accept them?

So, there we have it from the mainstream media.

So let's see if I have this straight:

Black Hebrew Israelites, a hate group: "harmless"
White boy who smirked: death threats and calls for expulsion from school

Yep. That's the take from the NYTimes, SJWs, and other left wing media.
When the media starts to view society in this way, we are really f'ed up. Too many people are influenced by what they say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There were numerous prominent people saying that they wanted to punch the boy.

That's the blunt question- since this is about violence and power, if they wanted to puch a boy, would they have called for raping a girl?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Diocese of Covington has issued a statement with an apology to Sandmann and the students of Covington Catholic.

Finally!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There were numerous prominent people saying that they wanted to punch the boy.

That's the blunt question- since this is about violence and power, if they wanted to puch a boy, would they have called for raping a girl?

Yes, of course.

That is what they said Kavanaugh's wife and daughter should have happen to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
MAGA trash automatically invites it's own criticism. Hard to be criticized if you're not actually acting like an a-hole. You should try it sometime.

So you are calling all those kids trash? That’s not true.

It was more of a general statement. All MAGA are trash.

Calling MAGA idiots "trash" <> violence
And I think they're ALL trash, not just the douchebaggy young white kids. White, black, brown, orange.

But keep dishing out the BS like you MAGAs like to do - typical.

Oh, great, so your the broad-minded "Bob's Country Bunker" type who's both prejudiced-and bigoted, but not currently violent
Who boy, that's a tightly wound spring that nobody wants to be near when it pops off.

Calling Johnny Carson as Carnak-the-Magnificent "In your future I see neighbors saying "no officer, he was always so quiet..."

Are you on drugs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
MAGA trash automatically invites it's own criticism. Hard to be criticized if you're not actually acting like an a-hole. You should try it sometime.

So you are calling all those kids trash? That’s not true.

It was more of a general statement. All MAGA are trash.

Calling MAGA idiots "trash" <> violence
And I think they're ALL trash, not just the douchebaggy young white kids. White, black, brown, orange.

But keep dishing out the BS like you MAGAs like to do - typical.

Oh, great, so your the broad-minded "Bob's Country Bunker" type who's both prejudiced-and bigoted, but not currently violent
Who boy, that's a tightly wound spring that nobody wants to be near when it pops off.

Calling Johnny Carson as Carnak-the-Magnificent "In your future I see neighbors saying "no officer, he was always so quiet..."

Are you on drugs?

DP.

PP is just calling a spade a spade. The person to whom pp was replying does seem on the edge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There were numerous prominent people saying that they wanted to punch the boy.

That's the blunt question- since this is about violence and power, if they wanted to puch a boy, would they have called for raping a girl?

Yes, of course.

That is what they said Kavanaugh's wife and daughter should have happen to them.

Agreed.

Here's my one-sentence summary of that last 170 pages:
Adults fantasizing about assaulting minors because the adult considers them "punchable or "f-ck-bl-" based on the type of hat or skirt they are wearing, "to teach them a leasson" is terrifying.

I do not understand how liberal parents can indulge in dark desires about how a male minor wearing a MAGA hat is "punchable" and fantasizing about assault, but claiming this would be justified because "he was asking for it", and "somebody needs to teach him a lesson".
This is logically equal to those adults finding that a female minor wearing a short skirt is "f-ck-bl-" and fantasizing about assault, but claiming this would be justified because "she was asking for it", and "somebody needs to teach her a lesson".

Judging a minor based on what clothes they are wearing, then fantasizing about assaulting them is sickening;
rationalizing it away in online discussions because they are "asking for it" and they are "flauting it" is no less so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There were numerous prominent people saying that they wanted to punch the boy.

That's the blunt question- since this is about violence and power, if they wanted to puch a boy, would they have called for raping a girl?

Yes, of course.

That is what they said Kavanaugh's wife and daughter should have happen to them.

Agreed.

Here's my one-sentence summary of that last 170 pages:
Adults fantasizing about assaulting minors because the adult considers them "punchable or "f-ck-bl-" based on the type of hat or skirt they are wearing, "to teach them a leasson" is terrifying.

I do not understand how liberal parents can indulge in dark desires about how a male minor wearing a MAGA hat is "punchable" and fantasizing about assault, but claiming this would be justified because "he was asking for it", and "somebody needs to teach him a lesson".
This is logically equal to those adults finding that a female minor wearing a short skirt is "f-ck-bl-" and fantasizing about assault, but claiming this would be justified because "she was asking for it", and "somebody needs to teach her a lesson".

Judging a minor based on what clothes they are wearing, then fantasizing about assaulting them is sickening;
rationalizing it away in online discussions because they are "asking for it" and they are "flauting it" is no less so.

Agree. And what scares me is that hateful liberals will regain full power. They will relegate Republicans to a status similar to that of Jews in the run-up years to Nazi Germany.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Are you on drugs?

No.

But, if you're looking, there's a guy in town who's an expert on hemp and cannabis.

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=1016303951731776&story_fbid=1031063390255832 wrote:
Tribal Hemp & Cannabis Education
March 28, 2015 ·

Meet the Speaker: Nathan Phillips (Omaha) Director of Native Youth Alliance will be on our Native patient advocate panel. He is a Vietnam veteran and is in the Michigan program. Here he can also be seen in this amazing video by Skrillex & Damian "Jr. Gong" Marley - Make It Bun Dem that has been viewed over 100 million times on You Tube. Besides speaking on the panel, his Native Youth Alliance drum group will be closing the THC-Summit with a song. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGpzGu9Yp6Y

You may know his face...

https://vimeo.com/51125604#at=2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
MAGA trash automatically invites it's own criticism. Hard to be criticized if you're not actually acting like an a-hole. You should try it sometime.

So you are calling all those kids trash? That’s not true.

It was more of a general statement. All MAGA are trash.

Calling MAGA idiots "trash" <> violence
And I think they're ALL trash, not just the douchebaggy young white kids. White, black, brown, orange.

But keep dishing out the BS like you MAGAs like to do - typical.

Oh, great, so your the broad-minded "Bob's Country Bunker" type who's both prejudiced-and bigoted, but not currently violent
Who boy, that's a tightly wound spring that nobody wants to be near when it pops off.

Calling Johnny Carson as Carnak-the-Magnificent "In your future I see neighbors saying "no officer, he was always so quiet..."

Are you on drugs?

DP.

PP is just calling a spade a spade. The person to whom pp was replying does seem on the edge.

Nah - pretty sure that was drunk/high rambling...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There were numerous prominent people saying that they wanted to punch the boy.

That's the blunt question- since this is about violence and power, if they wanted to puch a boy, would they have called for raping a girl?

Yes, of course.

That is what they said Kavanaugh's wife and daughter should have happen to them.

Agreed.

Here's my one-sentence summary of that last 170 pages:
Adults fantasizing about assaulting minors because the adult considers them "punchable or "f-ck-bl-" based on the type of hat or skirt they are wearing, "to teach them a leasson" is terrifying.

I do not understand how liberal parents can indulge in dark desires about how a male minor wearing a MAGA hat is "punchable" and fantasizing about assault, but claiming this would be justified because "he was asking for it", and "somebody needs to teach him a lesson".
This is logically equal to those adults finding that a female minor wearing a short skirt is "f-ck-bl-" and fantasizing about assault, but claiming this would be justified because "she was asking for it", and "somebody needs to teach her a lesson".

Judging a minor based on what clothes they are wearing, then fantasizing about assaulting them is sickening;
rationalizing it away in online discussions because they are "asking for it" and they are "flauting it" is no less so.

Agree. And what scares me is that hateful liberals will regain full power. They will relegate Republicans to a status similar to that of Jews in the run-up years to Nazi Germany.

Were you always a hysterical cow or is that something you grew into later in life?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you on drugs?

DP.
PP is just calling a spade a spade. The person to whom pp was replying does seem on the edge.

Nah - pretty sure that was drunk/high rambling...

And, thanks for opening a door on that topic.

Since Nathan Phillips spoke at a "Hemp & Cannabis Education /THC-Conference" AND was involved in "Native Youth Alliance Outreach", just how much "Cannabis Education" and "Youth Outreach" had been going on with the drummers prior to the confrontation?

And yes, I can imagine Sandman smirking because he's thinking "this IS the old-stoner-Indian-dude from the DJ Skrillex video...".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you on drugs?

DP.
PP is just calling a spade a spade. The person to whom pp was replying does seem on the edge.

Nah - pretty sure that was drunk/high rambling...

And, thanks for opening a door on that topic.

Since Nathan Phillips spoke at a "Hemp & Cannabis Education /THC-Conference" AND was involved in "Native Youth Alliance Outreach", just how much "Cannabis Education" and "Youth Outreach" had been going on with the drummers prior to the confrontation?

And yes, I can imagine Sandman smirking because he's thinking "this IS the old-stoner-Indian-dude from the DJ Skrillex video...".

You are sure obsessed with him for some unknown reason. Reminds me of your HRC obsession. Will you be talking about Phillips two years from now?