We don't care. |
I find it hard to believe that you actually think that the author of Genesis couldn't keep his story straight from one chapter to the immediate chapter after it. Regarding light and the sun, God is light. It is possible that the light mentioned here is in reference to the separation of created matter from God Himself. And then on Day 4, the actual heavenly bodies are created to regulate days and seasons and years, as the Bible says. (Incidentally, the Bible says water was created before the sun, which makes this story in Space.com about water being older than the sun pretty interesting to me: https://www.space.com/27256-earth-water-older-than-sun.html.) Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 should be read as an overview in Chapter 1 and a more detailed look in Chapter 2. They are not two different accounts. The references to vegetation in Genesis 2 are about agriculture and working the land for food and God planting a garden for Adam and Eve to enjoy and live in. It's mentioning a specific place that God put Adam and Eve, rather than just setting them loose anywhere. This can easily be differentiated from God creating vegetation itself in Genesis 1. Genesis 2 does not say that God created man and then animals. In verse 19, it merely references that God had created animals and that now He brought them to Adam to be named. You can claim this as a contradiction if you are committed to seeing contradictions where none need exist, but this is not a difficult thing to reconcile between the two chapters. Same thing goes for creating Adam and Eve. How committed are you to finding Biblical contradictions? You claim to be reading and thinking, but this objection is just pedantic clinging to an objection for objection's sake. Genesis 1 says God created male and female. Genesis 2 gives the particulars. This is not controversial unless you want to make it controversial. |
Then why are you here? |
+1 Thank you. you are far more patient with this pot stirrer than me. |
| *crickets* |
I don't have time to analyze each of the verses now, but please, go back to the Bible and provide a proper citation, not your interpretation of the word of God. Your fist cite speaks about light and sun. It is not interchangeable, and when God speaks about the light it does not necessary means he speaks about the sun. Your second cite is simply incorrect: GE 1:11-12, 26-27 11 Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” 27 So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. GE 2:4-9 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens. 5 Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth[a] and no plant had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground, 6 but streams[b] came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground. 7 Then the Lord God formed a man[c] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. 8 Now the Lord God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. 9 The Lord God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground—trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. If you read carefully, you will see that there are no contradiction: in the GE 1:11, God made the land to produce vegetation. It does not necessary means that the seeds already sprouted. He created the soil that is capable to produce vegetation. In GE 2:4, he says that there were no shrub or plant on the earth, but the earth already was able to produce them. Once the soil was watered with rain, then the seeds sprouted. |
+1 |
No, I have lots of peace, and confidence. Plus, I have facts and evidence, and I don't believe anything that is not backed up by them. That's a VERY comforting approach, I promise. |
I'm not sure you understand the difference between "Religion" and "Religious". And I don't demand anyone leave. All opinions are welcome to me. |
I lost in many years ago. There is absolutely no rational reason to believe in a god |
If you are going to parse words like that, and assign your own meaning to them, then the book simply cannot be taken literally, and is open to anyone's interpretations. You take obvious contradictions which can be spotted with grammar-school level textual criticism and try to make them fit your purposes. You wouldn't accept that type of analysis of law from your local sheriff, from a manual from your mechanic or of a medical book from your physician. Think about that, it may tell you something. Why wasn't god just crystal clear about these things? Would have saved a heck of a lot of holy-war-in'. And god created man in hos own image? Does god have a belly-button? And tell me now how all those animals fit on the ark. |
Maybe you should look at a career in law. Faith(s) is not concerned with evidence that’s acceptable to you. |
|
What is faith?
“Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” Hebrews11:1 |
No it wasn't snark. More not realizing that possibly if you have questions, dilemmas etc. you would pray about it. |
I have never been able to adequately figure out where Adam and Eve's sons found their wives. Do you have any insight to this? |