DOJ says Yale medical school discriminated against Asian, White applicants

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

Not a bummer at all. Don’t you want all doctors to meet the same qualifications regardless of race?

Who said they didn’t meet the qualifications. Your racist arse just made an assumption that the Black applicants weren’t qualified despite the original post stating that they were all SIMILARLY qualified.

DP. But they are not similarly qualified. Not even close

People like you will never believe it anyway. Medical schools should just admit every single Asian applicant and tell the black ones to go back to the fields. Is that what you want?

Not the poster you’re replying to, but we want medical school (or any college) admissions to be detached from skin colors. It’s just that simple. Too bad you’re too dumb or too racist to understand it.

The Supreme Court already gave you this three years ago. California struck down affirmative action THIRTY YEARS AGO and their universities are still getting sued by Asians who think that they're entitled to Stanford or Berkley.

You either didn’t read OP’s post or you’re too dumb to understand it. They’re still practicing racist discrimination after the ruling.

This administration's DOJ is going to say that about every school that admits a single black or brown student.

They didn’t say that. You just wanted to spin it that way. They just said not to use skin color to make decisions, which is the right thing to say.

So when you're in the ER and you tell them you only want an Asian doctor because the black ones are all DEI hires, is that not using skin color to make a decision?

When did I say that? Or you’re trying to put words into my mouth?

You said it when you made it clear that you think black students being admitted to medical school means that Asians must be getting discriminated against.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

Not a bummer at all. Don’t you want all doctors to meet the same qualifications regardless of race?

Who said they didn’t meet the qualifications. Your racist arse just made an assumption that the Black applicants weren’t qualified despite the original post stating that they were all SIMILARLY qualified.

DP. But they are not similarly qualified. Not even close

People like you will never believe it anyway. Medical schools should just admit every single Asian applicant and tell the black ones to go back to the fields. Is that what you want?

Not the poster you’re replying to, but we want medical school (or any college) admissions to be detached from skin colors. It’s just that simple. Too bad you’re too dumb or too racist to understand it.

The Supreme Court already gave you this three years ago. California struck down affirmative action THIRTY YEARS AGO and their universities are still getting sued by Asians who think that they're entitled to Stanford or Berkley.

You either didn’t read OP’s post or you’re too dumb to understand it. They’re still practicing racist discrimination after the ruling.

This administration's DOJ is going to say that about every school that admits a single black or brown student.

They didn’t say that. You just wanted to spin it that way. They just said not to use skin color to make decisions, which is the right thing to say.

So when you're in the ER and you tell them you only want an Asian doctor because the black ones are all DEI hires, is that not using skin color to make a decision?

Everyone, but you, knows that you get what you get in the ER.

My aunt is an emergency room physician and graduated at the top of her class. Interestingly enough, this hasn't stopped the patients that have told her that they don't want her "monkey hands" touching them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

Not a bummer at all. Don’t you want all doctors to meet the same qualifications regardless of race?

Who said they didn’t meet the qualifications. Your racist arse just made an assumption that the Black applicants weren’t qualified despite the original post stating that they were all SIMILARLY qualified.

DP. But they are not similarly qualified. Not even close

People like you will never believe it anyway. Medical schools should just admit every single Asian applicant and tell the black ones to go back to the fields. Is that what you want?

Not the poster you’re replying to, but we want medical school (or any college) admissions to be detached from skin colors. It’s just that simple. Too bad you’re too dumb or too racist to understand it.

The Supreme Court already gave you this three years ago. California struck down affirmative action THIRTY YEARS AGO and their universities are still getting sued by Asians who think that they're entitled to Stanford or Berkley.

You either didn’t read OP’s post or you’re too dumb to understand it. They’re still practicing racist discrimination after the ruling.

This administration's DOJ is going to say that about every school that admits a single black or brown student.

They didn’t say that. You just wanted to spin it that way. They just said not to use skin color to make decisions, which is the right thing to say.

So when you're in the ER and you tell them you only want an Asian doctor because the black ones are all DEI hires, is that not using skin color to make a decision?

When did I say that? Or you’re trying to put words into my mouth?

You said it when you made it clear that you think black students being admitted to medical school means that Asians must be getting discriminated against.

That’s the outcome of the DOJ investigation, also consistent with my own observation.
I have never said to only pick Asian doctors though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

Not a bummer at all. Don’t you want all doctors to meet the same qualifications regardless of race?

Who said they didn’t meet the qualifications. Your racist arse just made an assumption that the Black applicants weren’t qualified despite the original post stating that they were all SIMILARLY qualified.

DP. But they are not similarly qualified. Not even close

People like you will never believe it anyway. Medical schools should just admit every single Asian applicant and tell the black ones to go back to the fields. Is that what you want?

Not the poster you’re replying to, but we want medical school (or any college) admissions to be detached from skin colors. It’s just that simple. Too bad you’re too dumb or too racist to understand it.

The Supreme Court already gave you this three years ago. California struck down affirmative action THIRTY YEARS AGO and their universities are still getting sued by Asians who think that they're entitled to Stanford or Berkley.

You either didn’t read OP’s post or you’re too dumb to understand it. They’re still practicing racist discrimination after the ruling.

This administration's DOJ is going to say that about every school that admits a single black or brown student.

They didn’t say that. You just wanted to spin it that way. They just said not to use skin color to make decisions, which is the right thing to say.

So when you're in the ER and you tell them you only want an Asian doctor because the black ones are all DEI hires, is that not using skin color to make a decision?

Everyone, but you, knows that you get what you get in the ER.

My aunt is an emergency room physician and graduated at the top of her class. Interestingly enough, this hasn't stopped the patients that have told her that they don't want her "monkey hands" touching them.

Cool I guess they can hold hands with the black patients who go against doctor's advice. Ignorance abounds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

Not a bummer at all. Don’t you want all doctors to meet the same qualifications regardless of race?

Who said they didn’t meet the qualifications. Your racist arse just made an assumption that the Black applicants weren’t qualified despite the original post stating that they were all SIMILARLY qualified.

DP. But they are not similarly qualified. Not even close

People like you will never believe it anyway. Medical schools should just admit every single Asian applicant and tell the black ones to go back to the fields. Is that what you want?

Not the poster you’re replying to, but we want medical school (or any college) admissions to be detached from skin colors. It’s just that simple. Too bad you’re too dumb or too racist to understand it.

The Supreme Court already gave you this three years ago. California struck down affirmative action THIRTY YEARS AGO and their universities are still getting sued by Asians who think that they're entitled to Stanford or Berkley.

You either didn’t read OP’s post or you’re too dumb to understand it. They’re still practicing racist discrimination after the ruling.

This administration's DOJ is going to say that about every school that admits a single black or brown student.

They didn’t say that. You just wanted to spin it that way. They just said not to use skin color to make decisions, which is the right thing to say.

So when you're in the ER and you tell them you only want an Asian doctor because the black ones are all DEI hires, is that not using skin color to make a decision?

When did I say that? Or you’re trying to put words into my mouth?

You said it when you made it clear that you think black students being admitted to medical school means that Asians must be getting discriminated against.

That’s the outcome of the DOJ investigation, also consistent with my own observation.
I have never said to only pick Asian doctors though.

So it's your confirmation bias, as I expected. Thanks for being so predictable. Have a nice life!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

Not a bummer at all. Don’t you want all doctors to meet the same qualifications regardless of race?

Who said they didn’t meet the qualifications. Your racist arse just made an assumption that the Black applicants weren’t qualified despite the original post stating that they were all SIMILARLY qualified.

DP. But they are not similarly qualified. Not even close

People like you will never believe it anyway. Medical schools should just admit every single Asian applicant and tell the black ones to go back to the fields. Is that what you want?

Not the poster you’re replying to, but we want medical school (or any college) admissions to be detached from skin colors. It’s just that simple. Too bad you’re too dumb or too racist to understand it.

The Supreme Court already gave you this three years ago. California struck down affirmative action THIRTY YEARS AGO and their universities are still getting sued by Asians who think that they're entitled to Stanford or Berkley.

You either didn’t read OP’s post or you’re too dumb to understand it. They’re still practicing racist discrimination after the ruling.

This administration's DOJ is going to say that about every school that admits a single black or brown student.

They didn’t say that. You just wanted to spin it that way. They just said not to use skin color to make decisions, which is the right thing to say.

So when you're in the ER and you tell them you only want an Asian doctor because the black ones are all DEI hires, is that not using skin color to make a decision?

When did I say that? Or you’re trying to put words into my mouth?

You said it when you made it clear that you think black students being admitted to medical school means that Asians must be getting discriminated against.

That’s the outcome of the DOJ investigation, also consistent with my own observation.
I have never said to only pick Asian doctors though.

So it's your confirmation bias, as I expected. Thanks for being so predictable. Have a nice life!

How do you know it’s a bias? Constantly denying the SCOTUS ruling isn’t a bias? Enjoy stupid for the rest of your life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

SCOTUS ruling in Harvard lawsuits says exactly the opposite. So who do we believe? The SCOTUS or a liberal racist liar like you?

The SFFA case doesn’t say what you think that it does. Harvard won the discrimination portion of the case. The win was held up on appeal and not argued in front of the of the Supreme Court.

No one cares about the sophistic distinction you're trying to make, even if it might have some slim basis. Harvard's (and everyone else's) admissions practices were found to be illegal under the 1964 civil rights act. That overshadows anything else.

You really need to learn before hitting a keyboard. It is a huge distinction to anyone with a brain because they were not discriminating against Asians which is what people are screaming any time that admissions is based on something other than a test.

DP. Stop repeating the lies. If there was really no discrimination, the main stream media controlled by liberals would have had a field day.

You are too stupid to be part of this conversation. Why part of ‘they won’ are you struggling with?

Harvard did not win. It lost at the Supreme Court.
Repeating “they won” after the final ruling is not an argument. It is denial.

You desperately want to believe that Harvard was found guilty of discrimination against Asians but it isn’t what happened, the opposite happened. They were found not to have deliberately discriminated against Asians.

Discrimination by Harvard was not part of the argument at the Supreme Court in SFFA. The entire argument was about whether or not using race as part of the admissions criteria in college admissions violated the 14th amendment.

The effect of the ruling is that race cannot be used as part of the admissions rubric at any college. This is a far cry from “Harvard discriminated against Asians.”

You might want to stay away from legal issues going forward.

Harvard was found guilty of racial discrimination. Stop lying and repeating the lies.

The copium, and stupidity runs strong in you.

It’s obvious who is stupid and stubborn. It’s you.

One of us is a T14 graduate and the other is…..you. Why are you so desperate to believe that Harvard discriminated against Asians? The end result was what SFFA wanted even if it doesn’t give you what you so badly want to hear. Even the Wikipedia on the case is detailed enough to explain things to you if you actually take the time to read it.

[Anonymous]

If we, as a society, prevent universities from admitting individual students on the basis of their skin color, then the racist have already won.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

SCOTUS ruling in Harvard lawsuits says exactly the opposite. So who do we believe? The SCOTUS or a liberal racist liar like you?

The SFFA case doesn’t say what you think that it does. Harvard won the discrimination portion of the case. The win was held up on appeal and not argued in front of the of the Supreme Court.

No one cares about the sophistic distinction you're trying to make, even if it might have some slim basis. Harvard's (and everyone else's) admissions practices were found to be illegal under the 1964 civil rights act. That overshadows anything else.

You really need to learn before hitting a keyboard. It is a huge distinction to anyone with a brain because they were not discriminating against Asians which is what people are screaming any time that admissions is based on something other than a test.

DP. Stop repeating the lies. If there was really no discrimination, the main stream media controlled by liberals would have had a field day.

You are too stupid to be part of this conversation. Why part of ‘they won’ are you struggling with?

Harvard did not win. It lost at the Supreme Court.
Repeating “they won” after the final ruling is not an argument. It is denial.

You desperately want to believe that Harvard was found guilty of discrimination against Asians but it isn’t what happened, the opposite happened. They were found not to have deliberately discriminated against Asians.

Discrimination by Harvard was not part of the argument at the Supreme Court in SFFA. The entire argument was about whether or not using race as part of the admissions criteria in college admissions violated the 14th amendment.

The effect of the ruling is that race cannot be used as part of the admissions rubric at any college. This is a far cry from “Harvard discriminated against Asians.”

You might want to stay away from legal issues going forward.

Harvard was found guilty of racial discrimination. Stop lying and repeating the lies.

The copium, and stupidity runs strong in you.

It’s obvious who is stupid and stubborn. It’s you.

One of us is a T14 graduate and the other is…..you. Why are you so desperate to believe that Harvard discriminated against Asians? The end result was what SFFA wanted even if it doesn’t give you what you so badly want to hear. Even the Wikipedia on the case is detailed enough to explain things to you if you actually take the time to read it.

A T14 graduate who can’t stop lying. I’ve seen too many of those.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If we, as a society, prevent universities from admitting individual students on the basis of their skin color, then the racist have already won.

Aren’t you a racist by promoting admission by skin color?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we, as a society, prevent universities from admitting individual students on the basis of their skin color, then the racist have already won.

Aren’t you a racist by promoting admission by skin color?

Reread their post, you’re in agreement, but both of you are just blatantly ignoring noting the health outcomes of those with darker skin tone. It’s clear that discrimination is killing people in this country, but that isn’t as punchy as tHE leFt aRe ThE rEaL rACiSTs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

SCOTUS ruling in Harvard lawsuits says exactly the opposite. So who do we believe? The SCOTUS or a liberal racist liar like you?

The SFFA case doesn’t say what you think that it does. Harvard won the discrimination portion of the case. The win was held up on appeal and not argued in front of the of the Supreme Court.

No one cares about the sophistic distinction you're trying to make, even if it might have some slim basis. Harvard's (and everyone else's) admissions practices were found to be illegal under the 1964 civil rights act. That overshadows anything else.

You really need to learn before hitting a keyboard. It is a huge distinction to anyone with a brain because they were not discriminating against Asians which is what people are screaming any time that admissions is based on something other than a test.

DP. Stop repeating the lies. If there was really no discrimination, the main stream media controlled by liberals would have had a field day.

You are too stupid to be part of this conversation. Why part of ‘they won’ are you struggling with?

Harvard did not win. It lost at the Supreme Court.
Repeating “they won” after the final ruling is not an argument. It is denial.

You desperately want to believe that Harvard was found guilty of discrimination against Asians but it isn’t what happened, the opposite happened. They were found not to have deliberately discriminated against Asians.

Discrimination by Harvard was not part of the argument at the Supreme Court in SFFA. The entire argument was about whether or not using race as part of the admissions criteria in college admissions violated the 14th amendment.

The effect of the ruling is that race cannot be used as part of the admissions rubric at any college. This is a far cry from “Harvard discriminated against Asians.”

You might want to stay away from legal issues going forward.

Harvard was found guilty of racial discrimination. Stop lying and repeating the lies.

The copium, and stupidity runs strong in you.

It’s obvious who is stupid and stubborn. It’s you.

One of us is a T14 graduate and the other is…..you. Why are you so desperate to believe that Harvard discriminated against Asians? The end result was what SFFA wanted even if it doesn’t give you what you so badly want to hear. Even the Wikipedia on the case is detailed enough to explain things to you if you actually take the time to read it.

A T14 graduate who can’t stop lying. I’ve seen too many of those.

NP. When you lose the argument, just resort to accusing the other person of lying. Classic gaslighting technique.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

SCOTUS ruling in Harvard lawsuits says exactly the opposite. So who do we believe? The SCOTUS or a liberal racist liar like you?

The SFFA case doesn’t say what you think that it does. Harvard won the discrimination portion of the case. The win was held up on appeal and not argued in front of the of the Supreme Court.

No one cares about the sophistic distinction you're trying to make, even if it might have some slim basis. Harvard's (and everyone else's) admissions practices were found to be illegal under the 1964 civil rights act. That overshadows anything else.

You really need to learn before hitting a keyboard. It is a huge distinction to anyone with a brain because they were not discriminating against Asians which is what people are screaming any time that admissions is based on something other than a test.

DP. Stop repeating the lies. If there was really no discrimination, the main stream media controlled by liberals would have had a field day.

You are too stupid to be part of this conversation. Why part of ‘they won’ are you struggling with?

Harvard did not win. It lost at the Supreme Court.
Repeating “they won” after the final ruling is not an argument. It is denial.

You desperately want to believe that Harvard was found guilty of discrimination against Asians but it isn’t what happened, the opposite happened. They were found not to have deliberately discriminated against Asians.

Discrimination by Harvard was not part of the argument at the Supreme Court in SFFA. The entire argument was about whether or not using race as part of the admissions criteria in college admissions violated the 14th amendment.

The effect of the ruling is that race cannot be used as part of the admissions rubric at any college. This is a far cry from “Harvard discriminated against Asians.”

You might want to stay away from legal issues going forward.

Harvard was found guilty of racial discrimination. Stop lying and repeating the lies.

The copium, and stupidity runs strong in you.

It’s obvious who is stupid and stubborn. It’s you.

One of us is a T14 graduate and the other is…..you. Why are you so desperate to believe that Harvard discriminated against Asians? The end result was what SFFA wanted even if it doesn’t give you what you so badly want to hear. Even the Wikipedia on the case is detailed enough to explain things to you if you actually take the time to read it.

A T14 graduate who can’t stop lying. I’ve seen too many of those.

NP. When you lose the argument, just resort to accusing the other person of lying. Classic gaslighting technique.

What argument did I lose? Harvard lost the racial discrimination lawsuit. It was a fact.

[Anonymous]

To all those arguing that race matters and we need diversity in medicine: a) let's see some high quality studies you smart people, b) that aside, how do you seriously intend to accomplish that goal in a post SFFA environment?

Are you contending that Yale didn't violate SFFA, or that they did and it was Good, Actually?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

This can't be repeated too frequently. We NEED doctors of all races. It is critically important.

RACE MATTERS TO HEALTH OUTCOMES. How do all you "I don't see color" people react to that?

18 pages and nobody has posted a study. That’s because while they exist it’s hard to find one that’s not transparently flawed. Surprise us though.