REV Soccer Only CHAT, No drama please

[Anonymous]

If you suck, you coach youth soccer. If you have life skills you get a real job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you suck, you coach youth soccer. If you have life skills you get a real job.

Is that VRSC cuck husband chiming in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you suck, you coach youth soccer. If you have life skills you get a real job.

Is that VRSC cuck husband chiming in?

Whoever it is, they just fired a shot at every ECNL, GA and anyone who coaches youth soccer for a living, in the entire world. 😬

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gus Donaldo joining staff? Another clear reason that players will be defecting in the spring. We left GF because of that idiot. How tone deaf is the leadership at this club.

Why didn’t you like him? Everyone complains about kickball but he seems to at least try to play a possession game.

He’s a verbally abusive misogynist

Oh, so he will fit in well with the GA staff here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you suck, you coach youth soccer. If you have life skills you get a real job.

Is that VRSC cuck husband chiming in?

Whoever it is, they just fired a shot at every ECNL, GA and anyone who coaches youth soccer for a living, in the entire world. 😬

Well, isn't it correct? It's like the teacher who couldn't do.

[Anonymous]

Summary of GD based on PPs (here and GFR thread):

Pros:

1. Tries to play possession / tiki-taka based game and to avoid kick and run.
2. Holds players accountable with immediate in-game feedback.
3. Encourages players to do extra training, is willing to spend extra time with interested players, and rewards players who show that commitment with more playing time.

Cons:
1. Feedback can be harsh, particularly for sensitive players (and parents).
2. Charges for extra sessions (as does every coach in the DMV), which creates at least an appearance of a conflict of interest for playing time decisions.
3. Doesn’t like women (not clear if this applies to moms, players, or both).

[Anonymous]

NE to GRF confirmed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Summary of GD based on PPs (here and GFR thread):

Pros:

1. Tries to play possession / tiki-taka based game and to avoid kick and run.
2. Holds players accountable with immediate in-game feedback.
3. Encourages players to do extra training, is willing to spend extra time with interested players, and rewards players who show that commitment with more playing time.

Cons:
1. Feedback can be harsh, particularly for sensitive players (and parents).
2. Charges for extra sessions (as does every coach in the DMV), which creates at least an appearance of a conflict of interest for playing time decisions.
3. Doesn’t like women (not clear if this applies to moms, players, or both).

This sounds horrible but hey..the FCV gang is back together. Along with the obnoxious parents they brought,VRSC is a nightmare now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Summary of GD based on PPs (here and GFR thread):

Pros:

1. Tries to play possession / tiki-taka based game and to avoid kick and run.
2. Holds players accountable with immediate in-game feedback.
3. Encourages players to do extra training, is willing to spend extra time with interested players, and rewards players who show that commitment with more playing time.

Cons:
1. Feedback can be harsh, particularly for sensitive players (and parents).
2. Charges for extra sessions (as does every coach in the DMV), which creates at least an appearance of a conflict of interest for playing time decisions.
3. Doesn’t like women (not clear if this applies to moms, players, or both).

I disagree with this. He rage subs players who make a mistake and the in-game feedback consists of either beratement or ignoring the player, while trashing them to the rest of the team, nothing constructive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NE to GRF confirmed

confirmed where/by who?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NE to GRF confirmed

confirmed where/by who?

Was there a trade? How many draft picks did each club get?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NE to GRF confirmed

confirmed where/by who?

Was there a trade? How many draft picks did each club get?

Not sure who the bigger loser would be in this trade but the mom's at GFR should be stoked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I disagree with this. He rage subs players who make a mistake and the in-game feedback consists of either beratement or ignoring the player, while trashing them to the rest of the team, nothing constructive.

This, I'm sorry to say, is 100% accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Summary of GD based on PPs (here and GFR thread):

Pros:

1. Tries to play possession / tiki-taka based game and to avoid kick and run.
2. Holds players accountable with immediate in-game feedback.
3. Encourages players to do extra training, is willing to spend extra time with interested players, and rewards players who show that commitment with more playing time.

Cons:
1. Feedback can be harsh, particularly for sensitive players (and parents).
2. Charges for extra sessions (as does every coach in the DMV), which creates at least an appearance of a conflict of interest for playing time decisions.
3. Doesn’t like women (not clear if this applies to moms, players, or both).

I disagree with this. He rage subs players who make a mistake and the in-game feedback consists of either beratement or ignoring the player, while trashing them to the rest of the team, nothing constructive.

So do all his players dislike playing on his teams and leave? Or do some of his players and parents like him, but he’s nevertheless a bad fit for others (perhaps those who are less capable and/or thinner skinned). It’s not like he’s been coaching first teams at a top club where players who are aiming for P4 can feel trapped at a particular club. If he’s truly objectively bad, and not just a bad fit for some, you’d expect to see mass departures of players. Did that happen at GFR?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Summary of GD based on PPs (here and GFR thread):

Pros:

1. Tries to play possession / tiki-taka based game and to avoid kick and run.
2. Holds players accountable with immediate in-game feedback.
3. Encourages players to do extra training, is willing to spend extra time with interested players, and rewards players who show that commitment with more playing time.

Cons:
1. Feedback can be harsh, particularly for sensitive players (and parents).
2. Charges for extra sessions (as does every coach in the DMV), which creates at least an appearance of a conflict of interest for playing time decisions.
3. Doesn’t like women (not clear if this applies to moms, players, or both).

I disagree with this. He rage subs players who make a mistake and the in-game feedback consists of either beratement or ignoring the player, while trashing them to the rest of the team, nothing constructive.

So do all his players dislike playing on his teams and leave? Or do some of his players and parents like him, but he’s nevertheless a bad fit for others (perhaps those who are less capable and/or thinner skinned). It’s not like he’s been coaching first teams at a top club where players who are aiming for P4 can feel trapped at a particular club. If he’s truly objectively bad, and not just a bad fit for some, you’d expect to see mass departures of players. Did that happen at GFR?

Stop trying to apply logic to the conversation. People are either anti-VRSC in which case he’s a terrible abusive coach and everyone will leave, or pro-VRSC and he’s an experienced coach with something to offer.

I suggest everyone do their own research and form their own opinions.