Octuplet mom has 6 other kids!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3 of the existing 6 were already special needs kids. Now, she has potentially 8 more special needs kids who have a strong likelihood of having cerebral palsy among their disabilities. They're going to be on the state dole for the rest of their lives! The first 6 will probably be in and out of juvy bc they will not be properly raised, no matter Nadya's denials of how wonderful everything is.

Prophet of doom!

yes, starting with $3 million bucks for the parasites. What will they contribute to the betterment of society? Use a lot of limited resources and leave a lot of trash.

Maybe we could have a lottery for hateful Americans. The one winner gets dibs on drowning the first baby. Would you enter that contest, PP? I bet you would. Gross person. Ew. Stay away from me.

A lottery for those waiting to adopt, maybe?

[Anonymous]

I am appalled by some of the comments I heard about this mom on the television today. People talking about taking some of her kids away... what kind of world do we live in today? And the comments of that selfish prude of a grandmother...she should be thanking her daughter for all the blessings she has given her. I am a mom of eight and have to endure all the stares and rude questions about having so many children. Instead of of everyone badtalking this mom who obviously loves children they should be coming together to support her. "It takes a village to raise a child", did we forget?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am appalled by some of the comments I heard about this mom on the television today. People talking about taking some of her kids away... what kind of world do we live in today? And the comments of that selfish prude of a grandmother...she should be thanking her daughter for all the blessings she has given her. I am a mom of eight and have to endure all the stares and rude questions about having so many children. Instead of of everyone badtalking this mom who obviously loves children they should be coming together to support her. "It takes a village to raise a child", did we forget?

I love dogs. Should I have 14 of them in my house? Does that make me a responsible pet owner? These are human beings. They deserve a shot in life. I don't think life is going to be kind to them...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am appalled by some of the comments I heard about this mom on the television today. People talking about taking some of her kids away... what kind of world do we live in today? And the comments of that selfish prude of a grandmother...she should be thanking her daughter for all the blessings she has given her. I am a mom of eight and have to endure all the stares and rude questions about having so many children. Instead of of everyone badtalking this mom who obviously loves children they should be coming together to support her. "It takes a village to raise a child", did we forget?

Do you really believe that this unstable mom will be able to raise 14 kids under 7 yo all by herself? Many are and will have special needs on top of all that. It's not just about the mom; it's also about the welfare and future of the kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Drop the dice. Put your hands in the air. Walk away.

what does this mean?

[Anonymous]

First of all, dogs are not children nor do they compare. What's done is done. Now instead of attacking this woman why not get behind her. There are far worse people out there having children they didn't even want.

[Anonymous]

This is an extremely sad situation and I feel terrible for the children. I don't think anyone has any dislike for the children. I believe the negative thoughts are directed mostly at the mother, with some also for the doctor and some perhaps for her parents. The children are the losers here. There is no way a single mother, with 10 children ages 2 and under plus three special needs children, give all 14 childrenl the attention and support they need and deserve. Go ahead and put on your rose colored glasses, but this is just not possible. I have no qualms with people having large families. However, in this case, I believe it is apparent that this woman is mentally ill. So what is better for the children -- leave them with a mentally ill single mother who had the children so that she could have more people love her, or break them up and put them in the foster care system? I don't think either situation is ideal. I think there are many people out there who want to help the children, but have a hard time getting beyond their distaste for the mother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First of all, dogs are not children nor do they compare. What's done is done. Now instead of attacking this woman why not get behind her. There are far worse people out there having children they didn't even want.

Right, kids are more important. If I wouldn't treat dogs that way, I certainly wouldn't treat children that way.

[Anonymous]

Now a person is mentally ill because they want alot of children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First of all, dogs are not children nor do they compare. What's done is done. Now instead of attacking this woman why not get behind her. There are far worse people out there having children they didn't even want.

Right, kids are more important. If I wouldn't treat dogs that way, I certainly wouldn't treat children that way.

By having all of them, that means she is treating them badly? Unless we have watched her in her home and know the way she cares for them then do we really know if she is treating them wrong? Or does money determine how well we raise our children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First of all, dogs are not children nor do they compare. What's done is done. Now instead of attacking this woman why not get behind her. There are far worse people out there having children they didn't even want.

Right, kids are more important. If I wouldn't treat dogs that way, I certainly wouldn't treat children that way.

By having all of them, that means she is treating them badly? Unless we have watched her in her home and know the way she cares for them then do we really know if she is treating them wrong? Or does money determine how well we raise our children?

Don't know if you're aware, but you need money to PAY for things... food, some clothes, rent, health insurance. Some attention to the kids would also be beneficial. None of them will get adequate care or attention.

It's one thing to have 14 kids in 14 years (a lot of work in itself) but 6 + 8 all at once. What's not getting thru to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First of all, dogs are not children nor do they compare. What's done is done. Now instead of attacking this woman why not get behind her. There are far worse people out there having children they didn't even want.

Right, kids are more important. If I wouldn't treat dogs that way, I certainly wouldn't treat children that way.

By having all of them, that means she is treating them badly? Unless we have watched her in her home and know the way she cares for them then do we really know if she is treating them wrong? Or does money determine how well we raise our children?

Don't know if you're aware, but you need money to PAY for things... food, some clothes, rent, health insurance. Some attention to the kids would also be beneficial. None of them will get adequate care or attention.

It's one thing to have 14 kids in 14 years (a lot of work in itself) but 6 + 8 all at once. What's not getting thru to you?

Yes, I do know...like I said, I have eight and all my kids get the attention they need. I do a better job than most parents of two and have been told this by many.It is hard sometimes and no I do not spoil my children , but it can be done. And yes, I know it takes money to pay for things, i'm merely stating that money does not determine whether or not she will be a good mother. She seems driven and determined to be able to provide for them and with a little help from this selfish world I'm sure she will make it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First of all, dogs are not children nor do they compare. What's done is done. Now instead of attacking this woman why not get behind her. There are far worse people out there having children they didn't even want.

Right, kids are more important. If I wouldn't treat dogs that way, I certainly wouldn't treat children that way.

By having all of them, that means she is treating them badly? Unless we have watched her in her home and know the way she cares for them then do we really know if she is treating them wrong? Or does money determine how well we raise our children?

Forget money, any sane person knows a certain amount of money is necessary to provide basic food, shelter, education, and health care.

Let's just look at logistics. 14 kids? Under 8 years old. By herself? I sat for 2 hours last night just holding my kid who's miserable with a stomach bug and needed some cuddling. When I wasn't doing that, I was doing LOTS of laundry and disinfecting and offering foods and liquids that would appeal.

What happens when that kind of virus runs through her house? Either the place gets disgusting, or she spends all her time cleaning and no time comforting the children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First of all, dogs are not children nor do they compare. What's done is done. Now instead of attacking this woman why not get behind her. There are far worse people out there having children they didn't even want.

Right, kids are more important. If I wouldn't treat dogs that way, I certainly wouldn't treat children that way.

By having all of them, that means she is treating them badly? Unless we have watched her in her home and know the way she cares for them then do we really know if she is treating them wrong? Or does money determine how well we raise our children?

Forget money, any sane person knows a certain amount of money is necessary to provide basic food, shelter, education, and health care.

Let's just look at logistics. 14 kids? Under 8 years old. By herself? I sat for 2 hours last night just holding my kid who's miserable with a stomach bug and needed some cuddling. When I wasn't doing that, I was doing LOTS of laundry and disinfecting and offering foods and liquids that would appeal.

What happens when that kind of virus runs through her house? Either the place gets disgusting, or she spends all her time cleaning and no time comforting the children.

I'm not saying it won't be difficult and maybe she has bit off more than she can chew, what I'm saying is that the babies are here and instead of everyone complaining about what she did wrong why not lend a helping hand instead of talking about how we should take her kids away. Seperating these children and tearing a family apart somehow seems right to you people? Too many people are too quick to criticize and not quick to help one another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First of all, dogs are not children nor do they compare. What's done is done. Now instead of attacking this woman why not get behind her. There are far worse people out there having children they didn't even want.

Right, kids are more important. If I wouldn't treat dogs that way, I certainly wouldn't treat children that way.

By having all of them, that means she is treating them badly? Unless we have watched her in her home and know the way she cares for them then do we really know if she is treating them wrong? Or does money determine how well we raise our children?

Don't know if you're aware, but you need money to PAY for things... food, some clothes, rent, health insurance. Some attention to the kids would also be beneficial. None of them will get adequate care or attention.

It's one thing to have 14 kids in 14 years (a lot of work in itself) but 6 + 8 all at once. What's not getting thru to you?

Yes, I do know...like I said, I have eight and all my kids get the attention they need. I do a better job than most parents of two and have been told this by many.It is hard sometimes and no I do not spoil my children , but it can be done. And yes, I know it takes money to pay for things, i'm merely stating that money does not determine whether or not she will be a good mother. She seems driven and determined to be able to provide for them and with a little help from this selfish world I'm sure she will make it.

People magazine this week says she is not even taking care of the six she already had. They are cared for by grandma and a nanny. That's right - she has a nanny. And one of the 6 older kids is autistic. Now, I have a nanny myself, but I don't think I would go on TV nominating myself as mother of the year and how I have so much love for children I had to have 8 more when I am unemployed and have a nanny and someone else watching my kids.