Octuplet mom has 6 other kids!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was wearing friggin acrylic nails in her TV interview. I only have one kid, and no room for something as frivolous as that in my budget. What a nut.

I was distracted by her "thoughtfulness" to look ravishing for the camera with her Joker-like lips, in addition to her itty-bitty nose that she didn't get from her parents.

You hateful women might be the most revolting human beings alive. I'm sure the octuplet mom is a better person than you gossiping old hens.

I really DOUBT that Nadya is a better person than us. We put some thought into having children, make sure we are financially solvent, have a source of income other than welfare, and make sure we will be able to give adequate attention to each child. It's not just about squirting out a litter of babies, feeding them and then ignoring them and then go onto have another litter, like street dogs and rats.

Just think how unintentionally funny you come across with your panties in a major bunch over something that's a. not your business and b. has no discernable real life effect on you.

BTW, I hope they'll be dipping into your social security and medicare account to take care of the 14 kids + crazy mom for the duration of their lives.

I don't get the feeling this person is legal so it doesn't effect her. BTW I agree with you 100%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was wearing friggin acrylic nails in her TV interview. I only have one kid, and no room for something as frivolous as that in my budget. What a nut.

I was distracted by her "thoughtfulness" to look ravishing for the camera with her Joker-like lips, in addition to her itty-bitty nose that she didn't get from her parents.

You hateful women might be the most revolting human beings alive. I'm sure the octuplet mom is a better person than you gossiping old hens.

I really DOUBT that Nadya is a better person than us. We put some thought into having children, make sure we are financially solvent, have a source of income other than welfare, and make sure we will be able to give adequate attention to each child. It's not just about squirting out a litter of babies, feeding them and then ignoring them and then go onto have another litter, like street dogs and rats.

Just think how unintentionally funny you come across with your panties in a major bunch over something that's a. not your business and b. has no discernable real life effect on you.

BTW, I hope they'll be dipping into your social security and medicare account to take care of the 14 kids + crazy mom for the duration of their lives.

I don't get the feeling this person is legal so it doesn't effect her. BTW I agree with you 100%

Oh my gosh, are you suggesting that I'm not a citizen? Or that I'm some sort of other criminal? What does that even mean, you don't think I am "legal?" Born and raised here, sweetheart. You women scare me. So much hate. What do you do with it all when you're not posting here?

[Anonymous]

I'm not your sweetheart. I was looking at your spelling and somewhat broken English so I figured you probably were not legal. If you are great, if not I'm not going to loose any sleep. As far as my hate, I'm not hateful. I do believe this woman is mentally ill and it's unfair the Government- sorry I meant tax payers, will have to float the bill for this woman's "dream" She has clearly abused the system. I would not be surprised if she was really not injured and played on collecting disability as a way to get the IVF treatments

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not your sweetheart. I was looking at your spelling and somewhat broken English so I figured you probably were not legal. If you are great, if not I'm not going to loose any sleep. As far as my hate, I'm not hateful. I do believe this woman is mentally ill and it's unfair the Government- sorry I meant tax payers, will have to float the bill for this woman's "dream" She has clearly abused the system. I would not be surprised if she was really not injured and played on collecting disability as a way to get the IVF treatments

Would you mind quoting my mispellings or broken English, you useless bitch? (Since you prefer not to be my sweetheart).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not your sweetheart. I was looking at your spelling and somewhat broken English so I figured you probably were not legal. If you are great, if not I'm not going to loose any sleep. As far as my hate, I'm not hateful. I do believe this woman is mentally ill and it's unfair the Government- sorry I meant tax payers, will have to float the bill for this woman's "dream" She has clearly abused the system. I would not be surprised if she was really not injured and played on collecting disability as a way to get the IVF treatments

A bit ironic of you to quibble over the broken English when your own post is not exactly presenting you as the queen of the spelling bee. It's "lose" not "loose." But obviously, your typos and mispellings are the least of your problems. You opened up with a healthy dose of holier than thou disdain for woman with clear mental health issues, patted yourself on the back for being "better" than her, and now you've raised the bar even higher by making xenophobic comments (however misdirected, since I am as American as Apple Pie) about my nationality. I'm sure you get a lot of self-validation for yourself by putting people down on these boards, but you really are just a gross human being. I hope I never meet you.

[Anonymous]

Wow, a woman gives birth and we are all worried that now that 8 premies were born she is the one who has broken the California State budget. It was a mess and would have gone wrong even without her. And no, if she had not had the babies the 3 mil would not have gone to the state workers. It would have been used to spruce up someones beautiful office.

I think it is the height of hypocrysy to start blaming pregnant women for breaking the budget. Premies are born every day and California does get more than 8 premies a year.
Why must the benefits for the babies be taken away just because the government does not know how to manage their money?

I personally would not have made her decision, but let it go, she is happy and all the best to her.

There are many many more criminal acts in this world. Like the Enron executives that ran away with workers pensions. And you freak that the woman got costly care that was just a one time need.

[Anonymous]

I agree that the woman is clearly mentally ill. Her interview last night confirmed that for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree that the woman is clearly mentally ill. Her interview last night confirmed that for me.

I am watching it now, and agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow, a woman gives birth and we are all worried that now that 8 premies were born she is the one who has broken the California State budget. It was a mess and would have gone wrong even without her. And no, if she had not had the babies the 3 mil would not have gone to the state workers. It would have been used to spruce up someones beautiful office.

I think it is the height of hypocrysy to start blaming pregnant women for breaking the budget. Premies are born every day and California does get more than 8 premies a year.
Why must the benefits for the babies be taken away just because the government does not know how to manage their money?

I personally would not have made her decision, but let it go, she is happy and all the best to her.

There are many many more criminal acts in this world. Like the Enron executives that ran away with workers pensions. And you freak that the woman got costly care that was just a one time need.

Are you f*ing kidding?! This is not a one-time need. 3 of the existing 6 were already special needs kids. Now, she has potentially 8 more special needs kids who have a strong likelihood of having cerebral palsy among their disabilities. They're going to be on the state dole for the rest of their lives! The first 6 will probably be in and out of juvy bc they will not be properly raised, no matter Nadya's denials of how wonderful everything is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:3 of the existing 6 were already special needs kids. Now, she has potentially 8 more special needs kids who have a strong likelihood of having cerebral palsy among their disabilities. They're going to be on the state dole for the rest of their lives! The first 6 will probably be in and out of juvy bc they will not be properly raised, no matter Nadya's denials of how wonderful everything is.

Prophet of doom!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3 of the existing 6 were already special needs kids. Now, she has potentially 8 more special needs kids who have a strong likelihood of having cerebral palsy among their disabilities. They're going to be on the state dole for the rest of their lives! The first 6 will probably be in and out of juvy bc they will not be properly raised, no matter Nadya's denials of how wonderful everything is.

Prophet of doom!

yes, starting with $3 million bucks for the parasites. What will they contribute to the betterment of society? Use a lot of limited resources and leave a lot of trash.

[Anonymous]

Apparently he implanted 6 embryos in all of her previous pregnancies, and she had only concieved one child each time. So I can't blame him too much.

[Anonymous]

the fact that she had 8 babies is here, right here in our faces, we cant change what happened, we need to make sure she gets what she needs for these babies. Companies need to help her with diapers and formula. She will need to do whatever she can, sell her story, do a reality show, have someone document thier life whatever it takes because right now its about the children, its about them having a decent life, what they need to grow and live.
I have heard about the state taking the children, I cant see this, the other children are not abused, not starved, and from the pictures of thier home certianly have clothes. I believe if the state takes them it will cost the state to take care of them, and I believe they would be put up for adoption maybe seperated maybe put in one foster home after another, this is not good.
Debate what should have been done is fine, but its done, there here, lets help the children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3 of the existing 6 were already special needs kids. Now, she has potentially 8 more special needs kids who have a strong likelihood of having cerebral palsy among their disabilities. They're going to be on the state dole for the rest of their lives! The first 6 will probably be in and out of juvy bc they will not be properly raised, no matter Nadya's denials of how wonderful everything is.

Prophet of doom!

yes, starting with $3 million bucks for the parasites. What will they contribute to the betterment of society? Use a lot of limited resources and leave a lot of trash.

Maybe we could have a lottery for hateful Americans. The one winner gets dibs on drowning the first baby. Would you enter that contest, PP? I bet you would. Gross person. Ew. Stay away from me.

[Anonymous]

Drop the dice. Put your hands in the air. Walk away.