Ah, if only I had kids myself and a full-time job and stayed home on maternity leave. Oh wait, I did! |
I agree with all of this. |
I don’t have trouble reading. He said that he and his boss discussed it and that it didn’t make sense for him to go out to California and all. He didn’t say that he actually talked to his wife about any of it. |
She does not need to leave at 5 to get there before they close. She likes to pick the 4 year old up at a consistent time. Totally different. That said, I do think OP could manage a hard stop at 5 if wife was willing to let him sometimes go back to work for 30 minutes or so at some point before 8pm. There have to be tradeoffs here. As for that big meeting day, and the unexpected snow day, I think it is ridiculous to say OP could not assume that his wife, on maternity leave, would watch both kids, while he prepared for and presented these important meetings. Yes, it sucks to take care of an infant and a 4 year old but with one parent on leave that should be the default. Of course if it were a regular work day, I am sure he would have takens some time off to help out. But this was just bad timing. |
| This is literally the craziest thread I have ever read. I was a SAHM for a year but have mostly been a working mom. A SAHP or a parent on maternity/paternity leave is the default parent without need for discussion during the other parent's working hours. Period. It is crazy to suggest he should have canceled his important c-suite presentations so his wife on maternity leave did not need to take care of two kids at the same time. My nanny moved for her husband's job when I was 8.5 months pregnant with my second so I spent the vast majority of my 4 month maternity leave taking care of a baby and toddler alone. New nanny started two weeks before I went back to work to get to know our routines and so I could spend some quality alone time with each kid before going back to work. Anyone who cannot take care of two kids alone--at any ages--should not have had a second kid. Her DH could have been in California for 4 days. Even with no snow day, she would have had to take care of both in the evenings. |
He said exactly that. So you do have trouble reading. |
|
Pickmesha is HILARIOUS!!!! |
Wait, do you think that he is having quarterly meetings with his wife? |
He works 10-5:10. That's barely full time. He SHOULD be doing more. |
He IS doing more. He takes his 4 year old to daycare every morning during what most of us would consider typical work hours. And he is clearly involved as soon as his workday ends at 5, because he was aware on this particular snow day that his extra 10 minutes of work really messed up his wife's expectations. Clearly he is involved on typical days, or his wife wouldn't have lost her mind when he had the audacity to work for a 5 hour stretch without relieving her. |
Wifey? Momma?
|
Really? It's much easier to present to the C-suite than deal with 2 small children. I'd choose that every time. |
Yes, I'm sure that's why you're about to get promoted to the C suite. Because it's that easy. |
Who is covering third shift? (nighttime wakeups) Also, doesn't a good father want to spend time with his kids? Be competent at bathing, feeding, etc? |
I think this is a fine argument while she is on maternity leave, however, they need to sit down and discuss what they will do if this happens once she has returned to work. It isn't equitable to assume that his life will not change and his work will always assume priority, without a talk. |