This. There must be some accountability for god-awful, selfish decisions that result in irreparable harm and death to the community. I do not give a rat's ass what her personal circumstances were. She chose to be a criminal. Why should we accommodate her crap lifestyle choices? This is someone who is incapable of adding value to our communities. Lock her up, and let's hope that harsher criminal punishments will deter future bad actors. She can try to blame her situation on "mental illness" all she likes but the vast majority of us know this is crap. My SIL has a very serious mental illness. She is not robbing people or murdering anyone. My DH grew up in a war zone under gun and rocket fire. He has never chosen to hurt anyone and lives a quiet life as a professional with a family. I grew up in a largely Hispanic city and neighborhood. Most of my extended family grew up with no money, education and access to very little. The overwhelming majority of my family members are good people with jobs who just try to do their best. I have one cousin in jail. Not because he was a victim of racism or inequities but becuase he is a terrible, a-hole who made bad decisions in life. None of his siblings are in jail so he cannot blame his childhood, family situation, or whatever key factors of victimization have become popular now. Quit the victim mentality. Criminals have a choice 100%. When they opt to do nothing with their lives and become a danger to society, we need to enforce punishment to the maximum extend of the law. |
I think you mean UUV. |
WTF - DC sucks. |
Yes! That's literally exactly what I said! /s Jokes aside, that is not at all what I said and you know it. I said it will be hard to prove that the woman died because of the crash. Now, if a perfectly healthy person not experiencing a medical emergency was carjacked, and the autopsy later concluded they had died as the result of the crash, yes, that would be fairly easy to prove. You do get that this woman has likely had an autopsy done and if the murder charge was dropped, they couldn't conclude it was homicide? That being said I do hope this little animal gets the book thrown at her. She may not have murdered this particular woman, but mark my words, if we let her out she will never learn her lesson and go on to murder someone else. |
Stupid drug abusers that develop psychosis from their DIY drug use, then commit violent crimes? That’s what I mean at least |
But she should have been. |
The kind that meet some rando on Instagram, take whatever drug they are given and end up carjacking and killing someone. Seems self explanatory. |
Sigh. We don't hold in psych eval because they have high blood pressure. |
She wasn't being taken to the hospital for high blood pressure. She was there because she was a dumbass who took bad drugs from a rando. That's why her blood pressure and heart rate spiked. |
Incorrect. She was in fact transferred to a medical facility for precisely because of cardiac irregularities (BP, HR, arrhythmia, etc). the underlying reason doesn't matter to EMS. DC paramedics operate under an defined cardiac algorithm |
Did her parents not also say that she had been acting erratically for three days to the paramedics? That should have triggered extra security and a potential psych hold. Are we saying the two things can't happen at the same time? Sounds like a communication breakdown which isn't shocking in a city that gives short shift to mental health. How many people have been attacked/murdered in DC in the past five years by people who should be under a psych hold? Answer - a lot. |
| It’s so easy to get away with crime in this city. |
Exactly. Paraphrasing DC police as told to local news: “If you steal a car from a person that you think is elderly and kill them, we don’t really think that is a crime, even when the car is crashed into to attorney general’s office building.” |
The defense attorney just came up with that after the fact. She’s a murderer. Only an idiot could think otherwise. Or an accomplice. |
Yup. |