+1 well said. She's had enough chances. When these people murder us, we don't get a second chance at life. She failed herself. If more people like her were locked up for life our quality of life would be much better and the world a safer place. |
| The criminal's family would probably be relieved if she were locked up forever. It would also serve as an example to her younger family members. |
I don't forgive her, but I do think we, as a society, need to do better. Her parents called the police because she was a danger to herself and others. They did the right thing. What happened after that was nothing short of a failure of our systems. Age 22 is prime age for a major mental illness like schizophrenia or delusional manic episodes common to bipolar to manifest. There are a lot of people with mental illnesses around. What should their families do if they know they've gone off the deep end? She should not have been released from protective custody until she was no longer out of her mind and likely to hurt herself or others. Do I release her from responsibility? No. But also, we've got to get our act together as a society to deal with mental illness better. Throwing people out of mental institutions and then dismantling the legal system that puts them there has not worked out. We need to increase the number of beds and make it automatic that people who need them get them as soon as we need them or else we will have more people dying at the hands of people who are not in their right minds. That's just reality. |
You are a disgusting apologist. |
Do you think this mental illness was brought on by the medication from the unlicensed pharmacist she met online? |
Neither you nor I have any idea what mental illness she has or doesn't have. Let's get real. |
22 is also a prime age for loser drug abuse. |
She was transported for a high heart rate and high blood pressure due to the drugs she took, she was NOT transported on a psych hold. |
|
Some of you are confusing "having reasonable doubts about when the victim died" with "thinking that the criminal should go free."
I don't think Kenisha Brown should go free. I think she should be in jail. She carjacked someone. Unfortunately, judges in DC are soft on crime and have made clear that they don't jail people for carjacking. Now, do I think murder is a horrible crime? Yes. Do I think someone convicted of a murder should face the strongest consequence possible? Also yes. Do I think it's fair to say that there's some reasonable doubt that Kenisha Brown killed this woman? Again, yes. She is not a victim and we don't need to be "compassionate" to her mental health as some would suggest. (hell, her mental health is fine, she didn't have a psychiatric episode SHE WAS ON DRUGS) But it is not an automatic that she is the reason someone died, when that someone was being driven to the hospital for a medical emergency. Make sense? |
So, people in hospital parking lots are fair game if you want to murder someone because they might be experiencing a medical issue? Noted. |
When you say "these people" and "more people like her" what type of people do you mean exactly? |
yes. unfortunately two failed progressive reforms (mental health involuntary committment and crime prevention) collided here. |
I take it to mean people who have no problem pumping their bodies with drugs but do not want to be held accountable for the consequences of the effects of those drugs on behavior. |
she SHOULD have been kept on a psych hold. obviously. |
|
And it turns out the USAO dropped the murder charge…she’s only charged with unarmed carjacking.
https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1467765 |