With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry and Meghan are entitled yes but..Charles is a billionaire and many of Harry’s problems are a direct result of Charlie’s behavior. He should personally pay for Harry’s security and do it even if he is upset with him. Also Charles need to do all he can to reunite his boys especially if he is dying. What a crazy family.

If he is indeed terminal it is probably taking most of his energy just to stay alive. He has a good reason for not wanting to deal with people who have caused nothing but grief the last few years.

Harry is a 40 year old adult and has to take responsibility for his life and his actions. He is a head case and his wife is a narcissist. How come William can function normally but Harry cannot? They were raised by the same people. I think the answer is that William chose not to dwell on sadness about the past and try to make the most of his life. Harry chooses to be a victim and that's on him and his wife who indulges it.

Harry was so young when tragedy struck.
Be kind. He also sees therapists, and I don’t believe they would allow him to avoid self-reflection in all aspects.
He has some arrested development (emotionally) and a lot of anger from younger years. He has overcome a lot.

The Meghan media stuff triggered him/them and he panicked. I think it was a mistake to run.

However… he’s also going up against British media for the rest of his life. They NEED a bad guy to fill space. Prove me wrong. They will choose anyone they can like a zebra foal left at the back of the pack. They chose Meghan. (They chose Fergie, they sometimes chose Diana, they sometimes chose Charles. They don’t choose Andrew because they’re told to stay away. They chose Camilla until she worked out an access deal).

Try going up against what Murdoch built, dwindling and dead and desperate press money, a machine that has to fill space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry and Meghan are entitled yes but..Charles is a billionaire and many of Harry’s problems are a direct result of Charlie’s behavior. He should personally pay for Harry’s security and do it even if he is upset with him. Also Charles need to do all he can to reunite his boys especially if he is dying. What a crazy family.

If he is indeed terminal it is probably taking most of his energy just to stay alive. He has a good reason for not wanting to deal with people who have caused nothing but grief the last few years.

Harry is a 40 year old adult and has to take responsibility for his life and his actions. He is a head case and his wife is a narcissist. How come William can function normally but Harry cannot? They were raised by the same people. I think the answer is that William chose not to dwell on sadness about the past and try to make the most of his life. Harry chooses to be a victim and that's on him and his wife who indulges it.

Do you have kids? I would never not talk to my kids. I may be mad but no way would I pick a job over a
kid. It is nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry and Meghan are entitled yes but..Charles is a billionaire and many of Harry’s problems are a direct result of Charlie’s behavior. He should personally pay for Harry’s security and do it even if he is upset with him. Also Charles need to do all he can to reunite his boys especially if he is dying. What a crazy family.

If he is indeed terminal it is probably taking most of his energy just to stay alive. He has a good reason for not wanting to deal with people who have caused nothing but grief the last few years.

Harry is a 40 year old adult and has to take responsibility for his life and his actions. He is a head case and his wife is a narcissist. How come William can function normally but Harry cannot? They were raised by the same people. I think the answer is that William chose not to dwell on sadness about the past and try to make the most of his life. Harry chooses to be a victim and that's on him and his wife who indulges it.

Do you have kids? I would never not talk to my kids. I may be mad but no way would I pick a job over a
kid. It is nuts.

Yes. But I an looking it from the standpoint that Charles may be terminal and he's probably had it. It is not uncommon for people to drop bad influences when they are fighting a health crisis. Many sick people only see their inner circle.

[Anonymous]

Don’t you think the thought has cross the mind of Prince Charles that even if he wanted to see Harry that Harry would sneak pictures the way they did when they came back for the Queen’s funeral? The duo has shown time and time again that they cannot be trusted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you think the thought has cross the mind of Prince Charles that even if he wanted to see Harry that Harry would sneak pictures the way they did when they came back for the Queen’s funeral? The duo has shown time and time again that they cannot be trusted.

I'm no fan but don't remember them "sneaking pictures" when they came for QE funeral?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is he trying to ensure a bigger chunk of inheritance, to look good to his audience or may be missing his Pa?

He went from having a large boisterous family including aunts, uncles, cousins and life-long friends to having everyone cut off cold turkey. His children don’t have any contact with an entire side of their family. That’s got to hurt. Their only friends now seem to be celebrities and people who are being paid to be nice to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he trying to ensure a bigger chunk of inheritance, to look good to his audience or may be missing his Pa?

He went from having a large boisterous family including aunts, uncles, cousins and life-long friends to having everyone cut off cold turkey. His children don’t have any contact with an entire side of their family. That’s got to hurt. Their only friends now seem to be celebrities and people who are being paid to be nice to them.

They don't really have contact with a big chunk of her family either. Mainly just her mom from what I can tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he trying to ensure a bigger chunk of inheritance, to look good to his audience or may be missing his Pa?

He went from having a large boisterous family including aunts, uncles, cousins and life-long friends to having everyone cut off cold turkey. His children don’t have any contact with an entire side of their family. That’s got to hurt. Their only friends now seem to be celebrities and people who are being paid to be nice to them.

That happens to a lot of immigrants or even people who move to different states for work and can't afford flights for whole family to visit every year.

[Anonymous]

For all we know royal institution doesn't want to let them in and manipulate or aggravate Charles or worse ruin Willam's chances to become a king and continue the legacy by throwing more mud on the family. May be Camilla doesn't want them to give Charles more stress in this condition. Who knows how mentally or physically competent he is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry and Meghan are entitled yes but..Charles is a billionaire and many of Harry’s problems are a direct result of Charlie’s behavior. He should personally pay for Harry’s security and do it even if he is upset with him. Also Charles need to do all he can to reunite his boys especially if he is dying. What a crazy family.

It's been explained in this thread. Charles literally cannot pay for armed guards, no matter how he feels. That is not allowed, not his call who gets police protection. Meghan and Harry estranged themselves very quickly from Meghan's dad (who is in poor health too) due to him blabbing to the press, so it's pretty hypocritical on their part to be so upset and not get why Charles is distancing themselves from them for blabbing to the press. And they don't have the Mr. Markle excuse of being broke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you think the thought has cross the mind of Prince Charles that even if he wanted to see Harry that Harry would sneak pictures the way they did when they came back for the Queen’s funeral? The duo has shown time and time again that they cannot be trusted.

I'm no fan but don't remember them "sneaking pictures" when they came for QE funeral?

The money shot on the stairs Charles with his head down and Megan looking directly at the camera. Inside buckingham palace.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/king-charles-iii-awaits-queen-elizabeth-ii-casket-prince-harry-meghan-markle-buckingham-palace

They also included photos from off limits places from Kensington palace or buckingham palace in the documentary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you think the thought has cross the mind of Prince Charles that even if he wanted to see Harry that Harry would sneak pictures the way they did when they came back for the Queen’s funeral? The duo has shown time and time again that they cannot be trusted.

I'm no fan but don't remember them "sneaking pictures" when they came for QE funeral?

The money shot on the stairs Charles with his head down and Megan looking directly at the camera. Inside buckingham palace.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/king-charles-iii-awaits-queen-elizabeth-ii-casket-prince-harry-meghan-markle-buckingham-palace

They also included photos from off limits places from Kensington palace or buckingham palace in the documentary.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11497893/Meghan-Prince-Harry-took-private-photographer-Buckingham-Palace-without-Queens-permission.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I am not a fan of Meghan but it occurred to me today that the reason she gets so much hate is because she appears out of touch and aloof and her mannerisms are rehearsed and fake. She also rehashes platitudes that are not relevant to or accessible to many ordinary people. However, she seems to ingratiate herself easily to other high status, rich people like Oprah Winfrey, Gwyneth Paltrow, Prince Harry, Justin Trudeu's circle of friends etc.

It is because...they relate to her and they understand her. She is not being fake...when you are so rich and privileged and sheltered...you really do spiral over not being asked if you are ok and do tend to think flower sprinkles bring joy. She is so effervescent because she is beautiful, in a happy marriage with a Prince, lives on a gorgeous estate and is rich! That isn't performative!

She has lived in the 1% since her Suits days and is now part of the world elite. Of course she is out of touch and unrelatable!

I don't think this is correct. If this was the reason all rich and beautiful celebrities would be hated. The reason people don't like her is because she reached the status of a working member of the royal family, and all she did was complain. Then she left the royal family and claimed to want privacy but has continued to claim royal ties and try to make American status of being a Duchess when we don't have royal titles iinfluences.

The problem with that is that no one cares about members of the royal family who are not actually in the institution. The magic is in how the work together and present themselves to the public on special occasions. They do not shill on Instagram and do interviews with influencers. That is low level social media influencer behavior unworthy of the royal family.

Well how come the other rich and famous people seem to like her and want to be her friend? If she was truly so terrible surely there would be others of her same class who would shun her.

This is inaccurate. She's been shunned by several notable people. She tried to get near Kevin Costner onstage at a benefit and he moved away from her. She was also left off the guest list for birthday parties of Obama and Bezos. Allegedly her PR firm was told to keep her occupied to prevent her from trying to crash the Bezos party. So they shipped her off to that dumpy film premier in the Dominican Republic or Haiti.

Beyoncé, Oprah, George and Amal have all ignored her recently. Also Reece Witherspoon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I am not a fan of Meghan but it occurred to me today that the reason she gets so much hate is because she appears out of touch and aloof and her mannerisms are rehearsed and fake. She also rehashes platitudes that are not relevant to or accessible to many ordinary people. However, she seems to ingratiate herself easily to other high status, rich people like Oprah Winfrey, Gwyneth Paltrow, Prince Harry, Justin Trudeu's circle of friends etc.

It is because...they relate to her and they understand her. She is not being fake...when you are so rich and privileged and sheltered...you really do spiral over not being asked if you are ok and do tend to think flower sprinkles bring joy. She is so effervescent because she is beautiful, in a happy marriage with a Prince, lives on a gorgeous estate and is rich! That isn't performative!

She has lived in the 1% since her Suits days and is now part of the world elite. Of course she is out of touch and unrelatable!

I don't think this is correct. If this was the reason all rich and beautiful celebrities would be hated. The reason people don't like her is because she reached the status of a working member of the royal family, and all she did was complain. Then she left the royal family and claimed to want privacy but has continued to claim royal ties and try to make American status of being a Duchess when we don't have royal titles iinfluences.

The problem with that is that no one cares about members of the royal family who are not actually in the institution. The magic is in how the work together and present themselves to the public on special occasions. They do not shill on Instagram and do interviews with influencers. That is low level social media influencer behavior unworthy of the royal family.

Well how come the other rich and famous people seem to like her and want to be her friend? If she was truly so terrible surely there would be others of her same class who would shun her.

This is inaccurate. She's been shunned by several notable people. She tried to get near Kevin Costner onstage at a benefit and he moved away from her. She was also left off the guest list for birthday parties of Obama and Bezos. Allegedly her PR firm was told to keep her occupied to prevent her from trying to crash the Bezos party. So they shipped her off to that dumpy film premier in the Dominican Republic or Haiti.

Beyoncé, Oprah, George and Amal have all ignored her recently. Also Reece Witherspoon.

Taylor swift didn’t want to do her podcast

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you think the thought has cross the mind of Prince Charles that even if he wanted to see Harry that Harry would sneak pictures the way they did when they came back for the Queen’s funeral? The duo has shown time and time again that they cannot be trusted.

I'm no fan but don't remember them "sneaking pictures" when they came for QE funeral?

The money shot on the stairs Charles with his head down and Megan looking directly at the camera. Inside buckingham palace.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/king-charles-iii-awaits-queen-elizabeth-ii-casket-prince-harry-meghan-markle-buckingham-palace

They also included photos from off limits places from Kensington palace or buckingham palace in the documentary.

Are you claiming she took the picture from a distance. That she was in? I don’t need to tell you how impossible that is.