With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will raise the children to believe that their family said racist things about them before they were born. These are things she has said to the world, so of course she would say to her kids when they ask why they didn’t grow up in the U.K. as royals. I think she is a good mother, and that they will believe her—until they are much older and realize how much their parents messed up.

Of course, Harry is now telling the bbc that he “forgives” his family and wants to reconcile. He should have thought of that before going on Oprah and sitting there like a fool while his trashed his family.

He thought doing Oprah was the first stepping stone to billions of dollars, but time has proven that was not he case. I’m sure he regrets it. He has nothing really to show for publicly alienating himself from his family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I am not a fan of Meghan but it occurred to me today that the reason she gets so much hate is because she appears out of touch and aloof and her mannerisms are rehearsed and fake. She also rehashes platitudes that are not relevant to or accessible to many ordinary people. However, she seems to ingratiate herself easily to other high status, rich people like Oprah Winfrey, Gwyneth Paltrow, Prince Harry, Justin Trudeu's circle of friends etc.

It is because...they relate to her and they understand her. She is not being fake...when you are so rich and privileged and sheltered...you really do spiral over not being asked if you are ok and do tend to think flower sprinkles bring joy. She is so effervescent because she is beautiful, in a happy marriage with a Prince, lives on a gorgeous estate and is rich! That isn't performative!

She has lived in the 1% since her Suits days and is now part of the world elite. Of course she is out of touch and unrelatable!

I don't think this is correct. If this was the reason all rich and beautiful celebrities would be hated. The reason people don't like her is because she reached the status of a working member of the royal family, and all she did was complain. Then she left the royal family and claimed to want privacy but has continued to claim royal ties and try to make American status of being a Duchess when we don't have royal titles iinfluences.

The problem with that is that no one cares about members of the royal family who are not actually in the institution. The magic is in how the work together and present themselves to the public on special occasions. They do not shill on Instagram and do interviews with influencers. That is low level social media influencer behavior unworthy of the royal family.

Well how come the other rich and famous people seem to like her and want to be her friend? If she was truly so terrible surely there would be others of her same class who would shun her.

This is inaccurate. She's been shunned by several notable people. She tried to get near Kevin Costner onstage at a benefit and he moved away from her. She was also left off the guest list for birthday parties of Obama and Bezos. Allegedly her PR firm was told to keep her occupied to prevent her from trying to crash the Bezos party. So they shipped her off to that dumpy film premier in the Dominican Republic or Haiti.

[Anonymous]

After today's interview I think it's obvious that Harry only gers back if he leaves Meghan. The royal family want nothing to do with him as long as she's in tow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After today's interview I think it's obvious that Harry only gers back if he leaves Meghan. The royal family want nothing to do with him as long as she's in tow.

The sad part is that if he had said nice things about his family after leaving and didn't do the Oprah interview people would have liked them so much more and respected just wanting to step away from the UK (awful place compared to CA, vicious press) and the royal duties (boring, can seem pointless, Meghan can't work as an actress). it was just not a gracious exit. Meghan could be the star of Suits LA right now and rise in popularity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I am not a fan of Meghan but it occurred to me today that the reason she gets so much hate is because she appears out of touch and aloof and her mannerisms are rehearsed and fake. She also rehashes platitudes that are not relevant to or accessible to many ordinary people. However, she seems to ingratiate herself easily to other high status, rich people like Oprah Winfrey, Gwyneth Paltrow, Prince Harry, Justin Trudeu's circle of friends etc.

It is because...they relate to her and they understand her. She is not being fake...when you are so rich and privileged and sheltered...you really do spiral over not being asked if you are ok and do tend to think flower sprinkles bring joy. She is so effervescent because she is beautiful, in a happy marriage with a Prince, lives on a gorgeous estate and is rich! That isn't performative!

She has lived in the 1% since her Suits days and is now part of the world elite. Of course she is out of touch and unrelatable!

I don't think this is correct. If this was the reason all rich and beautiful celebrities would be hated. The reason people don't like her is because she reached the status of a working member of the royal family, and all she did was complain. Then she left the royal family and claimed to want privacy but has continued to claim royal ties and try to make American status of being a Duchess when we don't have royal titles iinfluences.

The problem with that is that no one cares about members of the royal family who are not actually in the institution. The magic is in how the work together and present themselves to the public on special occasions. They do not shill on Instagram and do interviews with influencers. That is low level social media influencer behavior unworthy of the royal family.

Well how come the other rich and famous people seem to like her and want to be her friend? If she was truly so terrible surely there would be others of her same class who would shun her.

This is inaccurate. She's been shunned by several notable people. She tried to get near Kevin Costner onstage at a benefit and he moved away from her. She was also left off the guest list for birthday parties of Obama and Bezos. Allegedly her PR firm was told to keep her occupied to prevent her from trying to crash the Bezos party. So they shipped her off to that dumpy film premier in the Dominican Republic or Haiti.

Oh boy. It was the Bob Marley premiere in Jamaica. She’s friends with the network head and his wife, that’s why she was there. Much shunning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I am not a fan of Meghan but it occurred to me today that the reason she gets so much hate is because she appears out of touch and aloof and her mannerisms are rehearsed and fake. She also rehashes platitudes that are not relevant to or accessible to many ordinary people. However, she seems to ingratiate herself easily to other high status, rich people like Oprah Winfrey, Gwyneth Paltrow, Prince Harry, Justin Trudeu's circle of friends etc.

It is because...they relate to her and they understand her. She is not being fake...when you are so rich and privileged and sheltered...you really do spiral over not being asked if you are ok and do tend to think flower sprinkles bring joy. She is so effervescent because she is beautiful, in a happy marriage with a Prince, lives on a gorgeous estate and is rich! That isn't performative!

She has lived in the 1% since her Suits days and is now part of the world elite. Of course she is out of touch and unrelatable!

I don't think this is correct. If this was the reason all rich and beautiful celebrities would be hated. The reason people don't like her is because she reached the status of a working member of the royal family, and all she did was complain. Then she left the royal family and claimed to want privacy but has continued to claim royal ties and try to make American status of being a Duchess when we don't have royal titles iinfluences.

The problem with that is that no one cares about members of the royal family who are not actually in the institution. The magic is in how the work together and present themselves to the public on special occasions. They do not shill on Instagram and do interviews with influencers. That is low level social media influencer behavior unworthy of the royal family.

Well how come the other rich and famous people seem to like her and want to be her friend? If she was truly so terrible surely there would be others of her same class who would shun her.

This is inaccurate. She's been shunned by several notable people. She tried to get near Kevin Costner onstage at a benefit and he moved away from her. She was also left off the guest list for birthday parties of Obama and Bezos. Allegedly her PR firm was told to keep her occupied to prevent her from trying to crash the Bezos party. So they shipped her off to that dumpy film premier in the Dominican Republic or Haiti.

Oh boy. It was the Bob Marley premiere in Jamaica. She’s friends with the network head and his wife, that’s why she was there. Much shunning.

Ok and it happened to be the same week as Bezos' birthday party that she was not invited to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After today's interview I think it's obvious that Harry only gers back if he leaves Meghan. The royal family want nothing to do with him as long as she's in tow.

I find it kind of hilarious that Harry has been on a five year crusade to try to get free security (and obviously to try to get IPP status) - waging legal battles, drafting two-page statements, and doing half hour interviews, the BP comes back with... this "All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion".

It's like an annoyed parent talking to their toddler.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After today's interview I think it's obvious that Harry only gers back if he leaves Meghan. The royal family want nothing to do with him as long as she's in tow.

I find it kind of hilarious that Harry has been on a five year crusade to try to get free security (and obviously to try to get IPP status) - waging legal battles, drafting two-page statements, and doing half hour interviews, the BP comes back with... this "All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion".

It's like an annoyed parent talking to their toddler.

I can’t imagine a world where my parent would not take my call. Harry is not perfect but the cold way he has been treated by his father is nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After today's interview I think it's obvious that Harry only gers back if he leaves Meghan. The royal family want nothing to do with him as long as she's in tow.

I find it kind of hilarious that Harry has been on a five year crusade to try to get free security (and obviously to try to get IPP status) - waging legal battles, drafting two-page statements, and doing half hour interviews, the BP comes back with... this "All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion".

It's like an annoyed parent talking to their toddler.

I can’t imagine a world where my parent would not take my call. Harry is not perfect but the cold way he has been treated by his father is nuts.

If I bashed my parents in the press repeatedly and blamed them for everything that happened to me (as they paid for the gorgeous mansion I live in and my life is actually pretty awesome...) I would fully expect them not to talk to me especially if I made it clear any of our future conversations would end up in the press as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After today's interview I think it's obvious that Harry only gers back if he leaves Meghan. The royal family want nothing to do with him as long as she's in tow.

I find it kind of hilarious that Harry has been on a five year crusade to try to get free security (and obviously to try to get IPP status) - waging legal battles, drafting two-page statements, and doing half hour interviews, the BP comes back with... this "All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion".

It's like an annoyed parent talking to their toddler.

I can’t imagine a world where my parent would not take my call. Harry is not perfect but the cold way he has been treated by his father is nuts.

Seriously? They both cut Meghan's father out of their lives because of a poorly thought out staged photo shoot and a couple of awkward interviews. Harry and Meghan have called the RF racist and colonialist (then tried to walk that back), wrote an entire book denigrating every member of the family for various slights against him including giving him the smaller room in the Palace, trying to make him do well in school, not giving them a bigger house soon enough, and pausing before handing over lip gloss, have done at least four or five tv interviews talking about their family, and are now trying to say without really saying it that Charles wants him dead and doesn't have long to live. Charles should have cut him out long, long ago.

[Anonymous]

Can someone explain to me why Charles isn’t speaking to Harry? What’s the “security stuff”? Sorry I’m behind on my royal gossip lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me why Charles isn’t speaking to Harry? What’s the “security stuff”? Sorry I’m behind on my royal gossip lol

Harry argued he should have armed protection in the UK and won't bring the kids back without it. The issue is nobody in the UK, no matter how powerful, has armed protection unless they are a select few (Some working royals, ministers, foreign visiting dignitaries) because it is provided by London Metro Police Protection Command unit only for these few approved people and under some circumstances. Princess Anne for instance only receives this protection when carrying out official duties. Harry thinks King Charles should have intervened to get him this protection, but it's not something he is in charge of.

As for Charles not speaking to Harry, I think the way Harry ran to the BBC to complain about Charles today makes it pretty clear why. Harry is a liability and cannot be trusted since he basically lied today and said Charles could have granted him something that's just not granted by Charles. He can't expect his family to want to talk to him when he keeps trying to make them look bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me why Charles isn’t speaking to Harry? What’s the “security stuff”? Sorry I’m behind on my royal gossip lol

Harry argued he should have armed protection in the UK and won't bring the kids back without it. The issue is nobody in the UK, no matter how powerful, has armed protection unless they are a select few (Some working royals, ministers, foreign visiting dignitaries) because it is provided by London Metro Police Protection Command unit only for these few approved people and under some circumstances. Princess Anne for instance only receives this protection when carrying out official duties. Harry thinks King Charles should have intervened to get him this protection, but it's not something he is in charge of.

As for Charles not speaking to Harry, I think the way Harry ran to the BBC to complain about Charles today makes it pretty clear why. Harry is a liability and cannot be trusted since he basically lied today and said Charles could have granted him something that's just not granted by Charles. He can't expect his family to want to talk to him when he keeps trying to make them look bad.

Thank you for the summary! Ugh, Harry is so entitled. Why can’t he just pay for security. Has he transitioned from royal to celebrity? Celebrities pay for their own security. These people are exhausting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me why Charles isn’t speaking to Harry? What’s the “security stuff”? Sorry I’m behind on my royal gossip lol

Harry argued he should have armed protection in the UK and won't bring the kids back without it. The issue is nobody in the UK, no matter how powerful, has armed protection unless they are a select few (Some working royals, ministers, foreign visiting dignitaries) because it is provided by London Metro Police Protection Command unit only for these few approved people and under some circumstances. Princess Anne for instance only receives this protection when carrying out official duties. Harry thinks King Charles should have intervened to get him this protection, but it's not something he is in charge of.

As for Charles not speaking to Harry, I think the way Harry ran to the BBC to complain about Charles today makes it pretty clear why. Harry is a liability and cannot be trusted since he basically lied today and said Charles could have granted him something that's just not granted by Charles. He can't expect his family to want to talk to him when he keeps trying to make them look bad.

Thank you for the summary! Ugh, Harry is so entitled. Why can’t he just pay for security. Has he transitioned from royal to celebrity? Celebrities pay for their own security. These people are exhausting.

He has offered to pay for it but really wants armed guards and that is the issue. He cannot pay London Metro Police so that just is not possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me why Charles isn’t speaking to Harry? What’s the “security stuff”? Sorry I’m behind on my royal gossip lol

Harry argued he should have armed protection in the UK and won't bring the kids back without it. The issue is nobody in the UK, no matter how powerful, has armed protection unless they are a select few (Some working royals, ministers, foreign visiting dignitaries) because it is provided by London Metro Police Protection Command unit only for these few approved people and under some circumstances. Princess Anne for instance only receives this protection when carrying out official duties. Harry thinks King Charles should have intervened to get him this protection, but it's not something he is in charge of.

As for Charles not speaking to Harry, I think the way Harry ran to the BBC to complain about Charles today makes it pretty clear why. Harry is a liability and cannot be trusted since he basically lied today and said Charles could have granted him something that's just not granted by Charles. He can't expect his family to want to talk to him when he keeps trying to make them look bad.

Thank you for the summary! Ugh, Harry is so entitled. Why can’t he just pay for security. Has he transitioned from royal to celebrity? Celebrities pay for their own security. These people are exhausting.

He has offered to pay for it but really wants armed guards and that is the issue. He cannot pay London Metro Police so that just is not possible.

Private security?