08 Girls

[Anonymous]

RL did not win any game in JEff cup or at game recently. They have tied but no wins but ONE for Herndon cup in March.

[Anonymous]

VSA should smoke PWSI RL just by statistics

[Anonymous]

Interestingly ECNL-RL and PWSI classic 08g have both played FPYC United blue this season and both games have been lost by 1 goal.

But like others mentioned this could be meaningless besides the 1k difference in price.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:VSA should smoke PWSI RL just by statistics

It won’t change even with VDA guest players. They tried and failed.

[Anonymous]

Win or loss is not important! Development of the players at this age is what matters. ECNL RL needs to bite the bullet and cut players that are not willing to do the extra work. Great coaches but they can’t make miracles happen. Otherwise they will have a hard time retaining their strong players.
Classic is a great semi travel team for girls that just want to play soccer. If you are looking for development and higher competition, classic is not it.

[Anonymous]

Adding VDA guest players does not help when you still have rec players on the field. They need to cut!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:RL did not win any game in JEff cup or at game recently. They have tied but no wins but ONE for Herndon cup in March.

Beat BRYC at ASIST. Why don’t you tell your coach to setup a scrimmage with the RL team?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Adding VDA guest players does not help when you still have rec players on the field. They need to cut!

Cut them in the middle of the season?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VSA should smoke PWSI RL just by statistics

It won’t change even with VDA guest players. They tried and failed.

Tried and failed what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interestingly ECNL-RL and PWSI classic 08g have both played FPYC United blue this season and both games have been lost by 1 goal.

But like others mentioned this could be meaningless besides the 1k difference in price.

Are you a coach ? You follow the stats pretty close!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adding VDA guest players does not help when you still have rec players on the field. They need to cut!

Cut them in the middle of the season?

They won’t be missed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PWSI vs VSA this weekend? Time to get the popcorn out.

Why? Both clubs are working together? Any players that perform well move into VDA

[Anonymous]

FPYCparent wrote:

Interestingly ECNL-RL and PWSI classic 08g have both played FPYC United blue this season and both games have been lost by 1 goal.

I wanted to post something like this yesterday, but I decided to wait until YSR showed some of the initial NCSL spring results. DD's FPYC team has played both PWSI teams mentioned within the last four or five weekends. Bear in mind that FPYC did not play a competitive match in all of 2020 (just scrimmages, mostly against NCSL D1 teams). From the "eye test" alone, I think the two PWSI squads are fairly even. YSR has the two teams within one goal differential of each other and that's the outcome I would expect. The team that actually comes out on top could just be a matter of a coin toss. A rematch between FPYC and either of the teams would also be a coin toss. For what it is worth, the PWSI Courage team beat Leesburg 4-2 to open the NCSL season, whereas FPYC only mustered a draw against the same team the next day.

If training for one of these PWSI teams is significantly higher than the other, I can understand some grumbling. However, I'd think of it this way ... You're paying more to face better competition (at least for the top end of ECNL-RL VA). NCSL may be more balanced competitively, which I don't think can be guaranteed in other leagues without promotion/relegation.

This is a great take.

We all know the saying if iron sharpens iron but does it make sense for this team to be competing against better competition with not a lot of results to show for it? Perhaps it is as PP have mentioned and they may have a good coach but if the team is what it is how much can he do if what he’s working with isn’t exactly the type of players you need in that style of program to be competitive.

And let’s not forget this doesn’t seem to be isolated to just the 08G for PWSI. Beyond U13 they field one team in U18/19 that has a winning record so there’s a lot of years there where there’s not a lot of production.

Back to the numbers game though and specifically looking at U13. Inside of PWSI’s program including recreational for 08G they field a single SFL team, two classic teams, and the ECNL team. Without a huge shuffle where do you fill the gaps when you can’t even get girls to play recreationally?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PWSI vs VSA this weekend? Time to get the popcorn out.

Why? Both clubs are working together? Any players that perform well move into VDA

Would be quite telling if the score was unbalanced. But that’s just my opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

FPYCparent wrote:

Interestingly ECNL-RL and PWSI classic 08g have both played FPYC United blue this season and both games have been lost by 1 goal.

I wanted to post something like this yesterday, but I decided to wait until YSR showed some of the initial NCSL spring results. DD's FPYC team has played both PWSI teams mentioned within the last four or five weekends. Bear in mind that FPYC did not play a competitive match in all of 2020 (just scrimmages, mostly against NCSL D1 teams). From the "eye test" alone, I think the two PWSI squads are fairly even. YSR has the two teams within one goal differential of each other and that's the outcome I would expect. The team that actually comes out on top could just be a matter of a coin toss. A rematch between FPYC and either of the teams would also be a coin toss. For what it is worth, the PWSI Courage team beat Leesburg 4-2 to open the NCSL season, whereas FPYC only mustered a draw against the same team the next day.

If training for one of these PWSI teams is significantly higher than the other, I can understand some grumbling. However, I'd think of it this way ... You're paying more to face better competition (at least for the top end of ECNL-RL VA). NCSL may be more balanced competitively, which I don't think can be guaranteed in other leagues without promotion/relegation.

This is a great take.

We all know the saying if iron sharpens iron but does it make sense for this team to be competing against better competition with not a lot of results to show for it? Perhaps it is as PP have mentioned and they may have a good coach but if the team is what it is how much can he do if what he’s working with isn’t exactly the type of players you need in that style of program to be competitive.

And let’s not forget this doesn’t seem to be isolated to just the 08G for PWSI. Beyond U13 they field one team in U18/19 that has a winning record so there’s a lot of years there where there’s not a lot of production.

Back to the numbers game though and specifically looking at U13. Inside of PWSI’s program including recreational for 08G they field a single SFL team, two classic teams, and the ECNL team. Without a huge shuffle where do you fill the gaps when you can’t even get girls to play recreationally?

Why don’t the R-ECNL and NCSL team play against each other? If NCSL wins, they take the R-ECNL spot.