08 Girls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Culina retired and all eyes on Quann to make the improvement. PWSI did try to make the right move by having their best coaches for 08 RL. They just now need to cut and recruit better players. I wouldn’t snub them as they are only a few players weak.

They put their best coach on the team and serious improvement has happened but they need to recruit players. There are players on this team that do not belong in R-ECNL.

It was probably difficult to assemble a team in COVID. QP will not be judged by the 08 R-ECNL record.

No one said QP is to blame or anyone for that matter. PWSI is to blame and PWSI should fix it. The club takes credit for the good things they should also be accountable for the bad. It is the club and coaches job to make a suitable environment for kids to enjoy playing soccer. Right now it’s not fun. Parents wouldn’t be complaining if their kids are enjoying themselves.

What needs to be fixed? The team is getting better and will add some new talent and cut some players just like every team does every year. Are you saying it’s not fun to play PWSI 2008 R-ECNL?

A lot needs to be fixed for the RL team. I am not sure how you think the team is improving. By not getting blow out? Had to bring guest players to keep the game close. The team is lacking goalies, left-wing, right-wing, do I need to name more?

Yes. Name more. What else do they need?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

R-ECNL was competitive at Jeff Cup and ASIST but would lose to the classic team whose players are trying out for the R-ECNL team but won’t make it?

Who has the axe to grind here? Classic parents or neighboring club parents?

Not sure what competitive means to you. Did RL win a game at Jeff Cup? I was not there to watch the games.
Has RL-ECNL won a game yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

A few years ago? So at U10 the classic team tied the red team (whose players are all at vda now)?

08G NPL...now...VDA
08G Red...now...RL

Players originally on the Red vs Classic. That would be a close one. 50/50.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

R-ECNL was competitive at Jeff Cup and ASIST but would lose to the classic team whose players are trying out for the R-ECNL team but won’t make it?

Who has the axe to grind here? Classic parents or neighboring club parents?

Not sure what competitive means to you. Did RL win a game at Jeff Cup? I was not there to watch the games.
Has RL-ECNL won a game yet?

Tied FFC and NCFC at jeff cup. Beat BRYC at ASIST. Tied kickers last week. Will lose by big # to VSA on Sunday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

A few years ago? So at U10 the classic team tied the red team (whose players are all at vda now)?

08G NPL...now...VDA
08G Red...now...RL

Players originally on the Red vs Classic. That would be a close one. 50/50.

I understand the game might’ve been close at U10. It would not be now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

A few years ago? So at U10 the classic team tied the red team (whose players are all at vda now)?

I don't think anyone from either team is on VDA

The U10 red team was the first team at PWSI. Most of those players are now at VDA.

I think you got confused with the NPL team. No one on Red made to VDA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

A few years ago? So at U10 the classic team tied the red team (whose players are all at vda now)?

I don't think anyone from either team is on VDA

The U10 red team was the first team at PWSI. Most of those players are now at VDA.

I think you got confused with the NPL team. No one on Red made to VDA

There is a player on vda who was on the red team at u-little.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

R-ECNL was competitive at Jeff Cup and ASIST but would lose to the classic team whose players are trying out for the R-ECNL team but won’t make it?

Who has the axe to grind here? Classic parents or neighboring club parents?

Not sure what competitive means to you. Did RL win a game at Jeff Cup? I was not there to watch the games.
Has RL-ECNL won a game yet?

Tied FFC and NCFC at jeff cup. Beat BRYC at ASIST. Tied kickers last week. Will lose by big # to VSA on Sunday.

Not if PWSI brings VDA guest players to help out to save faces

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Culina retired and all eyes on Quann to make the improvement. PWSI did try to make the right move by having their best coaches for 08 RL. They just now need to cut and recruit better players. I wouldn’t snub them as they are only a few players weak.

They put their best coach on the team and serious improvement has happened but they need to recruit players. There are players on this team that do not belong in R-ECNL.

It was probably difficult to assemble a team in COVID. QP will not be judged by the 08 R-ECNL record.

No one said QP is to blame or anyone for that matter. PWSI is to blame and PWSI should fix it. The club takes credit for the good things they should also be accountable for the bad. It is the club and coaches job to make a suitable environment for kids to enjoy playing soccer. Right now it’s not fun. Parents wouldn’t be complaining if their kids are enjoying themselves.

What needs to be fixed? The team is getting better and will add some new talent and cut some players just like every team does every year. Are you saying it’s not fun to play PWSI 2008 R-ECNL?

A lot needs to be fixed for the RL team. I am not sure how you think the team is improving. By not getting blow out? Had to bring guest players to keep the game close. The team is lacking goalies, left-wing, right-wing, do I need to name more?

Why don’t you call the coach? You seem to know the team very well. Maybe you can get goalies, left wing, and a right wing? Guest players to keep the game close? They tied kickers and should’ve beat them. The team also played great at Jefferson Cup and ASIST. Move your DD to another club maybe?

paid coach doesn't care

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

R-ECNL was competitive at Jeff Cup and ASIST but would lose to the classic team whose players are trying out for the R-ECNL team but won’t make it?

Who has the axe to grind here? Classic parents or neighboring club parents?

Not sure what competitive means to you. Did RL win a game at Jeff Cup? I was not there to watch the games.
Has RL-ECNL won a game yet?

Tied FFC and NCFC at jeff cup. Beat BRYC at ASIST. Tied kickers last week. Will lose by big # to VSA on Sunday.

Not if PWSI brings VDA guest players to help out to save faces

What guest players?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would say a lot of the comments have genuine concerns. Some of the comments seems to be from people who are directly affected. I would say this team warrant a closer inspection.

Agreed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

A few years ago? So at U10 the classic team tied the red team (whose players are all at vda now)?

08G NPL...now...VDA
08G Red...now...RL

Players originally on the Red vs Classic. That would be a close one. 50/50.

I understand the game might’ve been close at U10. It would not be now.

Take away RL new additions this Spring and play again classic. That would be close. That's why I said original Red team vs Original Classic. RL added 2 players this Spring that's from the classic team. This would be a better measure of how much they improve vs just adding players and claim improvement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

A few years ago? So at U10 the classic team tied the red team (whose players are all at vda now)?

08G NPL...now...VDA
08G Red...now...RL

Players originally on the Red vs Classic. That would be a close one. 50/50.

I understand the game might’ve been close at U10. It would not be now.

Take away RL new additions this Spring and play again classic. That would be close. That's why I said original Red team vs Original Classic. RL added 2 players this Spring that's from the classic team. This would be a better measure of how much they improve vs just adding players and claim improvement.

Those 2 players played red team then classic then R-ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these comments are so interesting.

Seeing how that club is structured I wonder if the team they field for ECNL would just be competitive against their top classic team. I bet the parents would be upset having to pay 1000 more for the same product.

I do not think the top classic team would be competitive against the r-ecnl team.

I think that the Classic team can beat the RL. Hint PWSI is too embarrassed to put the two teams together in a tournament now. They did that a few years ago. Red vs Classic it was tied but; $2k vs. $700 club should not be a tied

A few years ago? So at U10 the classic team tied the red team (whose players are all at vda now)?

08G NPL...now...VDA
08G Red...now...RL

Players originally on the Red vs Classic. That would be a close one. 50/50.

I understand the game might’ve been close at U10. It would not be now.

Take away RL new additions this Spring and play again classic. That would be close. That's why I said original Red team vs Original Classic. RL added 2 players this Spring that's from the classic team. This would be a better measure of how much they improve vs just adding players and claim improvement.

Those 2 players played red team then classic then R-ECNL.

hmm....interesting. Seems like they are trying to find a right fit.

[Anonymous]

PWSI vs VSA this weekend? Time to get the popcorn out.