Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still pretty sure she’s the narcissist and he’s the codependent. Her lying and pretending to be a victim just reinforces it.

People who see this narrative are unhinged.

This is a dude who chose to protect his wife and kids the way the 10 year old in him wished someone would have protected his dead mother.

This is called fan fiction. Do you lack your own family, so you live thru Meghan’s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think if you’re looking for reasons to be upset, you’ll aways find one.

Succinct and very on point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?

I thought she should know that yes you curtsy to the queen and that you give up a lot of personal freedoms, absolutely.

She also talked in the interview about how no one tried to prep or train her on anything and she would stay up all night learning anthems and songs and the right way to do things and the right way to say things to try to make them proud.

This. They set her up to fail. When she dazzled everyone, they started feeding false and awful stories to the tabloids to district from Pedo Andrew and Will's affairs.

+1

But what was the incentive to have her fail?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still pretty sure she’s the narcissist and he’s the codependent. Her lying and pretending to be a victim just reinforces it.

People who see this narrative are unhinged.

This is a dude who chose to protect his wife and kids the way the 10 year old in him wished someone would have protected his dead mother.

Actually you seem unhinged just by making that statement. Those of us who’ve been around personality disordered people can see her for what she is.

DP here. How do you know which party is "personality disordered"?? You lived there???? Who sounds unhinged?? OMG.

Look at all the question marks. Case in point. Unhinged.

Yet, still so many questions unanswered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm convinced not only did the Royals not want the biracial/black one to have a child in the first place (they were itching to write 'she's barren' articles but she got pregnant too quickly) but they wanted to punish Meghan for duping them - so they tried to take the only thing they could - the baby's security and HRH.

If he was old enough to school they would have refused to pay for it.

This is bullshit. Archie is the great grandchild of the Monarch. No great grandchildren have princely titles. That is how it is. When they become grandchildren of the monarch - when Charles ascends to the throne - they will get security.

Right.....but this thinking is completely outdated. We live in an age of social media radicalization and extremism. Where radicals plot violence on apps and can act on it in a matter of days.

That child has very real security needs TODAY. Not when Charles ascends to the throne. Now.

This is just one instance where the BRF as an institution refuses to face reality.

And anyone who can afford to buy a $20 Million house can afford private security guards instead of mooching off of granny.

They certainly could have "settled" for a perfectly lovely $5 million house, with ample left for security etc., but they really do want to have their cake.

Is it your money?

I'm not the one whining about being financially cut off in my mid-30s when I don't care to work.

Yes, I think the money issue is very off-putting to many.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?

I thought she should know that yes you curtsy to the queen and that you give up a lot of personal freedoms, absolutely.

She also talked in the interview about how no one tried to prep or train her on anything and she would stay up all night learning anthems and songs and the right way to do things and the right way to say things to try to make them proud.

This. They set her up to fail. When she dazzled everyone, they started feeding false and awful stories to the tabloids to district from Pedo Andrew and Will's affairs.

+1

But what was the incentive to have her fail?

There wasn't. They wanted her to respect the hierarchy, which she had no interest in doing. Neither side is blameless here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is no chance self-made Oprah has any respect for this spoiled conniving mentally ill common opportunist.

Oprah used this lying woman and she’s too dumb to see it.

Oprah did not buy it. Her mannerisms and tone were telling that she was not buying it.

Human Resources? Really? That was when it had completely flown the coop.

My 15-year old son said "she went to see Toby?". I spit my drink out on that one. We had just finished the entire Office series.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm convinced not only did the Royals not want the biracial/black one to have a child in the first place (they were itching to write 'she's barren' articles but she got pregnant too quickly) but they wanted to punish Meghan for duping them - so they tried to take the only thing they could - the baby's security and HRH.

If he was old enough to school they would have refused to pay for it.

This is bullshit. Archie is the great grandchild of the Monarch. No great grandchildren have princely titles. That is how it is. When they become grandchildren of the monarch - when Charles ascends to the throne - they will get security.

Right.....but this thinking is completely outdated. We live in an age of social media radicalization and extremism. Where radicals plot violence on apps and can act on it in a matter of days.

That child has very real security needs TODAY. Not when Charles ascends to the throne. Now.

This is just one instance where the BRF as an institution refuses to face reality.

And anyone who can afford to buy a $20 Million house can afford private security guards instead of mooching off of granny.

Right- I also found it curious that they thought they'd be safer in the U.S. than Canada. Are there a lot of rabid tabloid press and royal family ubers in Canada?

No, the point is that she has a network in the US that can help them...witness Tyler Perry giving them his house for a few months. When she says she was in a union and it protected her, she doesn’t just mean contract provisions.

[Anonymous]

I’m so confused. Why are these two whining about the BRF not financially supporting them or providing security when they stepped away as working members? Am I missing something? Why do you have an expectation that it should continue when you don’t work there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?

why cant they have passports and driver's licenses?

I think this is one of those things that seems more sinister than it actually is.

If BRF members travel anywhere in an official capacity as working senior family members, it would be arranged by the royal household and on a private plane (in most cases), so they wouldn't really need access to their passports. Their secretaries probably have them if needed, but they don't really go through security or customs like the rest of us. Even their personal travel probably would have been arranged by one of the secretaries. 

Her American or Canadian driver's license wouldn't do her much good in the UK anyway. If she'd stayed in the UK long-term, she'd probably just have gotten her license there. The Queen isn't required to have a license or a passport, but others in the family have theirs. 

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no chance self-made Oprah has any respect for this spoiled conniving mentally ill common opportunist.

Oprah used this lying woman and she’s too dumb to see it.

Oprah did not buy it. Her mannerisms and tone were telling that she was not buying it.

Human Resources? Really? That was when it had completely flown the coop.

My 15-year old son said "she went to see Toby?". I spit my drink out on that one. We had just finished the entire Office series.

The fact that you think there is no HR apparatus in the Firm is kind of risible.

Americans are really poorly-informed about the relationship between the family and the Firm. They are not contiguous. The Firm is a business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still pretty sure she’s the narcissist and he’s the codependent. Her lying and pretending to be a victim just reinforces it.

People who see this narrative are unhinged.

This is a dude who chose to protect his wife and kids the way the 10 year old in him wished someone would have protected his dead mother.

This is called fan fiction. Do you lack your own family, so you live thru Meghan’s?

NP. That was exactly Harry's (summarized) response to leaving.

I don't see how you think it's fan fiction. Your second sentence makes you seem unwell and incapable of critical thought.

[Anonymous]

It seems very clear to me that these two wanted to have their cake and eat it too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the biggest questions coming out of this interview is whether it was Charles or William who expressed concern about Archie's skin color. I'm curious to see how they react/defend themselves. Really curious to see if staff loyal to one or the other will leak to the press in defense of their person. IOW, will we see some kind of jockeying between the two houses to not get pegged with the single most damaging revelation of the interview. (Meghan said revealing the identity would be very damaging, so I think that pretty much limits the possibilities to Charles or William, as no one would be surprised if Phillip said it.)

It may have been both. In the interview with Oprah this morning I don't think she implied it was just 1 person. William says moronic things all the time that get overlooked because the focus is on bashing Harry. Charles is seems dimwitted enough if he were not royal he would not make it in the world and hold down a decent job.

Harry thought it was funny to wear a Nazi uniform and was naked in a Vegas hotel room with strippers.

Has it not occurred to you that Harry’s wearing a Nazi uniform was a passive aggressive way of calling out his family? Many members have very close ties to Nazis, some of the relations *were* Nazis, SS officers.

It’s obvious that Harry’s justified resentment over how his mother was treated and how her death was handled profoundly impacted him. Seems to me that on some level - maybe unconsciously- he was acting out against the family in engaging in some of those youthful indiscretions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no chance self-made Oprah has any respect for this spoiled conniving mentally ill common opportunist.

Oprah used this lying woman and she’s too dumb to see it.

Oprah did not buy it. Her mannerisms and tone were telling that she was not buying it.

Human Resources? Really? That was when it had completely flown the coop.

My 15-year old son said "she went to see Toby?". I spit my drink out on that one. We had just finished the entire Office series.

The fact that you think there is no HR apparatus in the Firm is kind of risible.

Americans are really poorly-informed about the relationship between the family and the Firm. They are not contiguous. The Firm is a business.

I am a Fed and I wouldn't go to HR about my mental illness, even if it were job stress.

The 'Toby' thing was funny.