Not the PP, but the trashiness is just plain embarrassing. Nice try with the rape cliche, but it does you no good. We are not discussing rape. I have a huge problem with schoolgirls sending obscene photographs of themselves anywhere. So ugly, so sad. |
I am the type of mom who is sick of girls saying they were raped when it was consensual, but get their feelings hurt because it was sex not love. |
It's more like the teens have consensual sex and then one of them tells other people. There's no rape analogy at all. It's offensive to rape victims to even suggest a similarity. |
Me again. I believe it is ugly and sad because this type of acting so often indicates having been sexually molested. So very sad. |
Another misogynistic attempt to blame the girls for leading the poor, innocent boys astray. One can't help but wonder if this is the general atmosphere at the high school involved in this case or just the attitude of a few individuals? If you want the girls to take responsibility for their possible actions you need to accept that the actions of the boys were far more blame-worthy. It took time and effort to put this site together. The difference in the level of culpability has been noted numerous times. It does a child no favors to make excuses and blame others for their actions. |
Oh for Christ's sake. Let's pretend, for the sake of discussion, that all the teens in question are boys. Some boys took naked pics of themselves, just for fun or to send with love to their boyfriends or girlfriends. And some other boys thought it would be clever to collect pics of naked boys from their school and post them on some website. They convinced boys to send them naked pics, or convinced a few of the boyfriends or girlfriends to betray their loved ones by forwarding the naked pics. Then someone found out about it, reported it, and the gig was up. Now, do you give all the boys a pass with this behavior? Do you blame only some of the boys? Is there plenty of blame to go around but you blame some more than others? Can you see how different people could have different opinions on this behavior and relative culpability without misogyny having anything to do with it? |
As a woman who was raped, I find your comment misinformed, offensive and downright dangerous to the future of our girls. |
Are you serious? THERE IS NO PRIVACY ON THE INTERNET. |
No. The people who collect the pictures and invite others to view the pictures are the more culpable. They expose those in the pictures to ridicule and, by attaching names to the pictures, place the people in the pictures in danger from someone with bad intent who can find out where they live. Boy or girl, deliberately subjecting others to ridicule and danger is far more blameworthy. It's clear where the greater culpability lies when you take boy v. girl out of the question, so the attacks on the girls throughout this thread do appear to be motivated by misogyny. |
Or even more: Absence of a strong father figure in the home. |
And yet, if the girls had just refrained from sharing their naked pics on social media we wouldn't be arguing relative culpability. |
You're just going to have to excuse me but no, he is clearly NOT a wonderful kid and he has clearly NOT been taught proper respect or morals. Your friends are an epic example of parenting failure. Accept it - your friends are not as great as they may seem. Not even close. |
"It does a child no favors to make excuses and blame others for their actions." This applies equally to the girls. |
Unfortunately, no one should expect total privacy in an email. Think of "e-mail" as "evidence mail" and it will change what you decide to put into a document that is essentially a forever document that once it is sent you have no control over any longer. |
Sorry, but it only applies equally if the girls both took the pictures themselves and then put them together into a website and circulated links so others could view them. At this time, there is nothing in the news indicating the girls took the pictures themselves and two boys are being investigated for starting, owning, and/or operating the website where 52 folders of pictures, 24 of which were labeled with names, were found. It does not appear that the boys in question were dragged or forced in any way to keep, organize, and distribute these pictures. The people in the pictures were held up for embarrassment and have been placed in danger. It is much worse to embarrass others and put people in danger than it is to do something foolish thinking someone is romantically interested in you. In terms of character, it is far worse to take advantage of another's vulnerability to put them in a position of embarrassment and possible danger. |