While there may be a few posts like this, most of the posts that focused on the girls were as a result of people saying they placed no blame at all on the girl, which I totally disagree with. I definitely don't think the boys should get a pass at all. I'm just appalled by those posters who think it's ok for girls to send porn to other minors. I don't want my child being the recipient of any pictures like this and think the girls need to be held accountable or they and others will keep doing this. Just because the boys are more wrong doesn't mean what the girls did wasn't also unacceptable and in fact criminal. |
I do not see an attempt to "absolve" or "excuse," but instead a veiled request to allow the investigators and prosecutors to do their jobs, in a matter involving juveniles, without a lynch mob forming outside their doors. Is it really too much to suggest that you tread more lightly at this particular juncture? I guess only you can answer that question. |
And this would be an example of a poster with reading compression problems. |
And spelling problems. |
Reading compression--Is that the new strategy FCPS concocted for over-worked high school students to maximize the amount of coursework reading they can cram into their busy schedules? |
This whole thread makes me want to go Duggar!
|
But is your child sick of it? Yes, I'm sure he's an angel, who immediately deletes the pics and would never share them. |
Agree. In those other schools, there was no 20 page defense thread where people called those kids "wonderful boys." I'm sur the McLean Mommies think they are bein persecuted, but I think they brought it on themselves by trashing the girls and defending the boys so vociferously. |
The pics were "posed" according to police report. I don't know how you unintentionally pose. Or accidentally post your nude pose. But believe what you will. |
He is only 13 and hasn't even hit puberty yet, so yes, he is a bit sick of them. But by the time he is 16 I am sure he will be desensitized to the fact that they are "private" and to be cherished and probably will drop them in a Dropbox to share. |
On the bright side, there has been no suggestion Ryan McElveen intends to be anyone's date at the McLean prom, so at least we're spared from that. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/fairfax-school-board-member-scales-back-plans-after-accepting-students-prom-invitation/2014/05/21/a3b22340-df9a-11e3-8dcc-d6b7fede081a_story.html |
One person on the 20 pages called the boy wonderful. There is no defense of the boys other than that. The 20 pages are of people who are shocked at how many people think what the girls did is not a significant part of the problem. I'm one of the posters on those twenty pages and I in no way defended the boys. I also am not a McLean mommy. Just a mother of two daughters whom I don't want to think it's ok to do this or be delusional enough to think it's "just a mistake." It's way more than that. People with this attitude are enablers who are putting girls in danger by not holding them accountable for their actions. I find the whole thing sad and disturbing. |
You may be certain that the younger siblings who sneak onto their older sibling's phone are instantly, thoroughly sickened. |
I'm not seeing the posts that say it's okay to send porn, I just keep seeing the ones saying that the children who took their own individual pictures have the same amount of culpability as the young people who collected and labeled the pictures, put them on a website, and sent out links to others to view. I also see posts using demeaning terminology to describe the children whose pictures are in the folders on the site. I see that you are in fact acknowledging that the site creators have more moral culpability, but other posts have not. If it is true that children took their own pictures, I suspect that the fallout from this incident will be a deterrent. |
Few kids have a parent at home. What do you expect? |