We could easily thwart their plans by not processing everyone in. |
He wants Ukraine funding. He couldn't care less about a border deal. The evidence of that is that past 3 years. He could have stopped the flow at the border in a number of ways - all currently part of our law. He also could have taken executive action. He did nothing to secure the border. |
You realize that migrants are coming from all over the world. They are not all "brown," as you like to claim. We have no problem with immigrants who come here legally and want to be part of our country. I have huge issues with those whose FIRST action when coming to this country is to break our laws by entering illegally. Get over your race baiting and face reality. |
There's a whole generation who thinks that at no point can you ever tell someone "No.”
The sad thing is we're going to be living in a broken country if these people continue to get their way. Someone eventually has to be the adult and tell people "No.” Otherwise it's like having a five year old drive the car. Sure you won't crash for awhile, but eventually it's going to be bad. |
DP. Oh, I think lots of people do have a problem with even legal immigrants, particularly when they change the socio-economic/ethnic/racial makeup of local schools and neighborhoods, appear to be taking jobs away from US-born Americans (e.g., Indians with tech backgrounds on Hb1 visas), or don't enthusiastically show they "want to be a part of our country" by not assimilating in the way that native-born Americans would like. |
You are correct. When I said, "want to be part of our country," i meant that they follow our laws, want to assimilate, become productive members of our country, and work to make this country even greater. |
The Scandinavian and German immigrants to US lived in their own insular Midwestern ghettos complete with newspapers in their mother tongue, specialty import grocery stores, their own religions, etc. It’s not likely they magically were “assimilated Americans” when they got here. Many of them never bothered to learn English! |
Were they living in government provided housing? Did they get free health care? Did the take advantage of social services? Were there big spikes in crime, like robberies, because of their presence like is happening in Chicago and NY? |
Just because large-scale immigration made sense at one stage of a nation’s history, doesn’t mean it makes sense at every stage.
Just because a little bit of something is good, doesn’t mean that more and more and more of it is always better. |
Serious question. Let's say all the people who have an issue with border control are racist. I mean that hypothetically. Do you feel we should continue with our current policy of mass undocumented immigration to spite them? Or do you sincerely believe our current border policies are optimized for America's best interests? |
You want to keep doing this? You think the guy who advocated turning the other cheek wanted cruelty to those with no power. Good. god. By all means change the laws. It’s unfortunate that it was US policy that did so much to destroy those countries but ffs stop tarting yourselves as Christians. You aren’t. |
Written in the same manner as your predecessors who wanted to pull up the ladder behind them. |
IOW, you selectively follow the bible when it's convenient. Got it. |
Sounds like you do if you aren't for following laws and if you aren't against lying. There is not one thing in the Bible that states that a country needs to take in all migrants that show up at their door, enter illegally, and then lie about their status when it comes to asylum. |
1) I think you fundamentally misunderstand Christianity. Jesus wasn't a pacifist pushover who thought nations didn't exist, governments and laws shouldn't be acknowledged, etc. While he brought the message of God's love, he also made clear that we have a vengeful God who will cast evil people to literally burn in hell for eternity. That seems to put a significant caveat on the "turn the other cheek" message, don't you think? 2) enforcement of borders isn't cruel. You and I have to submit to security screening to simply board a plane, but it's okay for noncitizens to stream in through the border? I'm stopped at customs. Is that cruelty, to hold everyone to the same standards? My foreign relatives have to adhere to the restrictions of their visas. But if they come through the southern border, it doesn't apply? I'm trying to understand why I have to deal with "cruelty" at the airport every time I travel, but we can't require noncitizens who are in the process of violating our laws to deal with this "cruelty". |