Fall 2022 Over/Under-Enrollment at FCPS High Schools

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTF is TJ underenrolled?

Change it to an Academy

This one simple change could solve so many issues, including the over crowding at McLean.

I thought TJ got rid of the rigid academic requirements two years ago. That should allow black and hispanics to attend TJ, right? Why is TJ still under enrollment?

TJ was expanded to a design capacity of 2390 during its renovation.

When they changed the admissions process, they also agreed to expand the TJ entering classes to about 540 students (up from around 475). They are two years into that change, so TJ's enrollment can be expected to go up by another 130 students or so two years from now.

That would leave TJ below capacity compared to its design capacity, though less so than is the case now. It's been argued TJ would be overcrowded if it actually had more than 2250 students or so, because of the space requirements for some of TJ's labs, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTF is TJ underenrolled?

Change it to an Academy

This one simple change could solve so many issues, including the over crowding at McLean.

I thought TJ got rid of the rigid academic requirements two years ago. That should allow black and hispanics to attend TJ, right? Why is TJ still under enrollment?

TJ was expanded to a design capacity of 2390 during its renovation.

When they changed the admissions process, they also agreed to expand the TJ entering classes to about 540 students (up from around 475). They are two years into that change, so TJ's enrollment can be expected to go up by another 130 students or so two years from now.

That would leave TJ below capacity compared to its design capacity, though less so than is the case now. It's been argued TJ would be overcrowded if it actually had more than 2250 students or so, because of the space requirements for some of TJ's labs, etc.

Why would TJ require more space requirements now that it has dumped down the academic requirements?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTF is TJ underenrolled?

Change it to an Academy

This one simple change could solve so many issues, including the over crowding at McLean.

I thought TJ got rid of the rigid academic requirements two years ago. That should allow black and hispanics to attend TJ, right? Why is TJ still under enrollment?

TJ was expanded to a design capacity of 2390 during its renovation.

When they changed the admissions process, they also agreed to expand the TJ entering classes to about 540 students (up from around 475). They are two years into that change, so TJ's enrollment can be expected to go up by another 130 students or so two years from now.

That would leave TJ below capacity compared to its design capacity, though less so than is the case now. It's been argued TJ would be overcrowded if it actually had more than 2250 students or so, because of the space requirements for some of TJ's labs, etc.

Why would TJ require more space requirements now that it has dumped down the academic requirements?

You could probably spar with people on the AAP forum forever about the TJ admissions changes. The TJ labs aren't going to be converted to classrooms for remedial reading.

For purposes of this thread, the most relevant part of the TJ admissions changes is that it means more kids ending up at some already overcrowded high schools like Chantilly, McLean, and Oakton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:September 2022 FCPS HS enrollments vs. current or planned permanent capacity:

Severely Over-Crowded:

Centreville 133.1%
Chantilly 129.8%
McLean 122.1%

Modestly Over-Crowded to Modestly Under-Enrolled:

West Springfield 105.8%
Woodson 105.6%
Edison 105.2%
Marshall 102.6%
Oakton 102.1%
Robinson 99.9%
Fairfax 97.6%
Annandale 96.4%
Hayfield 96.0%
Westfield 93.8%
Herndon 93.6%
Justice 93.3%
Lake Braddock 92.7%
South Lakes 92.5%
West Potomac 90.8%
South County 90.3%

Significantly Under-Enrolled:
Langley 89.2%
Madison 85.1%
Falls Church 84.1%
TJ 82.5%
Mount Vernon 79.6%
Lewis 78.8%

At some point, FCPS will announce expansion plans for Centreville as part of its upcoming renovation. Chantilly and McLean remain overcrowded with either no solution offered (Chantilly/Stella Pekarsky) or a weak solution put in place that isn't adequately addressing the problem (McLean/Tholen). At the other end of the enrollment spectrum, Mount Vernon remains over 20% under-capacity, yet FCPS just expanded nearby West Potomac to 3000 seats, and Lewis has under 1700 students this fall while West Springfield now has over 2500 kids.

McLean HS needs not to accept students who live in Falls Church. That will solve the overcrowding problem.

It's not like you apply. There are boundaries. Right now FCPS has a high school for roughly every 46,000 residents. McLean has about 50,000 residents, which isn't enough to support two FCPS high schools. So Langley has all of Great Falls, and parts of McLean, Vienna, Reston and Herndon. McLean now has parts of McLean and Falls Church.

However, McLean has 2433 kids this fall and Falls Church has 2103. FCPS being FCPS, they are expanding Falls Church to 2500 seats and leaving McLean with 1993. Since Marshall and McLean are going to be getting more kids from Tysons, there's going to be a push to move the part of Timber Lane (currently a McLean/Falls Church split feeder) that feeds into McLean to Falls Church once Falls Church's renovation is finished. It will reduce the diversity at McLean. Parents at McLean have pleaded for a permanent addition for years and have been ignored. So now it's going to be FCPS left to explain why they are either leaving McLean overcrowded or reducing its diversity.

This does seen like a good boundary solution. We are zoned for FCHS and loved it - and it is going to be beautiful once the renovation is complete. The McLean schools are so overcrowded for years, with no renovation in sight, that I am surprised it has not had an effect on the real estate market there.

[Anonymous]

Changing TJ to an Academy would help by freeing up classroom space in other high schools. There are almost no classes offered to TJ freshmen and sophomores that are not offered at every other school.

Allow any Junior or Senior in FCPS or the surrounding counties access to TJ if they want and meet the pre-reqs. Could have one group of kids attend their base schools on the even days and TJ on the odd days. They have another cohort that attends base school on the even days and TJ on the even days.

This frees up classroom space at the high schools with a high interest in the post-AP offerings only available at TJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You get the school district you vote for

Keep voting lockstep with teAM bLuE!11 because of some irrelevant political issues that the hacks are using to manipulate you into turning your $3.2B annual FCPS budget over to a bunch of political hacks who aren't interested in educating YOUR children or preserving YOUR property values.

Are you joking? "Team blue" so far has been a conservative's dream come true. No boundary changes along with allowing worsening conditions at the undesirable schools has catapulted property values at the "good" schools. A republican candidate who goes on about removing useless equity policies and truly taking action for equality might actually have to do something that hurts property values.

The school board often rezoned for capacity when it was run by republicans.


Somehow they managed to do this without tanking property values.

Rezoning based on reasonable factors like capacity and distance-to-school has always been an occasional requirement in many public schools. Rezoning based on "racial and social equity" of One Fairfax--shifting kids around like pieces on a gameboard based on their race or parental income level--is a terrible idea. That's what's in store for FCPS---the factors to be considered for rezoning have already been amended along those lines. Nothing conservative about that.

FCPS has never actually changed a single boundary based on "One Fairfax" principles. When the School Board took tentative steps along those lines back in 2018, the local Republicans - many from the Langley area - intimidated the hell out of them and they shut it down. The Langley/McLean boundary change from 2021 - where Elaine Tholen overrode a staff recommendation that would have moved some Tysons apartments to Langley and instead made sure only expensive single-family homes were reassigned - was actually regressive from an "equity" standpoint. The Republicans from Great Falls will continue to claim the School Board is going to redistrict based on "One Fairfax," and the Democrats will continue to be all talk and no action because they live in fear of vocal parents.

If you're in the "right" neighborhood, it's a classic "heads I win, tails you lose" scenario. Of course, there are also a lot of folks on the losing end, but recent history shows they get ignored by the School Board.

DP. I honestly can't count how many time you have posted exactly the same rant. Here's the thing: "One Fairfax" nonsense *should* be shut down. If Langley parents are the only ones bold enough to take action, so be it. The Democrats *should* live in fear of vocal parents because everything they do is asinine. It's just too bad more parents across FCPS don't speak up for themselves too.

PP was in response to the same nonsense again from right-wingers about how the School Board is intent on redistricting everyone based on “One Fairfax,” which they have never done and almost certainly never will. That’s the rant, so there’s good reason to call it out for the scaremongering that it is.

Then FCPS should quit braying about “One Fairfax” once and for all. Because as long as they act as if that’s their guiding principle (rather than, say, simply focusing on education), there will be pushback.

You might ask yourself why a slogan that now means little more than “we’re all in this together” triggers you so much, or why you’d claim that it’s incompatible with a focus on education.

Because it doesn't mean "we are all in this together" it means "we will focus only on supporting the people who are behind and ignore the needs of everyone else." And the reality is that what they are doing to support the people who are behind is not new or innovative or working so that those kids are falling farther behind and the kids who could be excelling are left to their parents devices to meet their potential. Because the "One Fairfax" bullshit has achieved nothing and is only words with no real action.

If we want to help kids who are ESOL, then we need need ESOL classrooms in ES where there is the strongest chance to help the kids learn English and not mixed classes where the kids are not learning English and the English speaking kids are not getting much out of the class. They do that for MS and HS and it works reasonably well. Why are we not doing this as soon as kids need it in ES? In the name of equity or diversity? We are dragging out a vital skill for ESOL kids that is needed to get them on grade level across the board AND we are slowing down learning for English speaking kids by mixing the classroom. It is a lose lose situation. But separating the ESOL kids looks bad so we can't do that.

Why don't we have more programs to support kids who are struggling? Why not have normal size classes for kids who are on grade level or advanced at Title 1 schools and spend the extra money on smaller classes for kids who are behind? Have more reading and math specialists to pull into those smaller classes so that the kids who are behind have more individualized attention and a better chance at getting up to grade level? Probably because it would look bad because the classes would be divided by SES, which strongly correlates with race, and god forbid we have kids who minorities in classes as a group because they need more support.

The kids who are behind are falling farther behind and the kids who are on grade level or advanced are not being given opportunities to grow and learn. The parents who are fed up with it are leaving for private schools or are supplementing at home or using programs to supplement. So those parents are making sure that their kids are getting a better education and are being challenged.

And parents fight boundary changes because they don't want to move to a school that is caught in this cycle of failure because of crappy policies and implementation of strategies in the name of equity and fairness. I would rather be in an over crowded high school (my kids school is not over crowded but is close) then stuck at an under performing high school where the school is more focused on equity then meeting the actual needs of the kids. No one wants to move to the schools that are chronically unfilled because the programs at those schools suck. Yes, there is IB or AP but there are not as many offerings because so few kids can take them. At least at a crowded or over crowded school there are more academic options for my kid. And lets face it, many of the MC and UMC kids that you would move to the under crowded schools are not going to be in classes with the kids who are already there. There are a good number of schools where you can point to a school within a school where the AP/IB kids are in their own bubble away from the ESOL and FARMs kids who continue to struggle academically because the programs in FCPS for them suck.

I think your perceptions of "reality" may not align with FCPS educators, but perhaps they'll have a populist appeal next fall.

It's a bit odd to pivot from claiming FCPS is going to redistrict county-wide in the name of equity pursuant to One Fairfax to now asserting it's an empty slogan, but the latter ("only words with no real action") is probably closer to the truth.

As was noted in a PP, when handed a chance on a platter to introduce some housing diversity to Langley, the county's least diverse high school, Elaine Tholen and her colleagues made sure that did not happen. To the contrary, Elaine doubled down on making sure Langley draws almost entirely from expensive, single-family homes. So forgive those of us who think the idea that they are going to start reassigning kids to schools 15-20 miles away from their houses (as opposed to 3 miles) because of "One Fairfax" is fanciful.

As for your other comments, perhaps you could start a new thread to explore them. The focus of this thread is on schools that are either well above or well below capacity, and what FCPS might do to address those issues, not on whether their model for teaching for ESOL students is flawed. Perhaps there is some relationship (if, for example, some parents pull their kids out of schools if they think the ESOL students won't be in ESOL-only classes, leading to their under-enrollment), but otherwise it will likely derail the thread. In particular, posters might want to debate how you complained that FCPS now "will focus only on supporting the people who are behind," but then spent a lot of time suggesting they focus even more on that cohort.

The reason behind the massive over enrollment is that parents don't want their schools redistricted to the under enrolled schools because of the issues that surround those schools, primarily the massive gaps between the kids who are struggling (ESOL and lower SES kids). No one wants to move to Lewis or Justice or Herndon. Heck, people are hesitant about South Lakes. Since the solution is not build capacity at over crowded schools we need to look at why no one wants their kids at those lower enrolled high schools. Parents will fight being redistricted into a poorly performing school with fewer class opportunities then what is available at their existing school. And since the parents who are fighting that move have more money and are more likely to vote, the School Board is not going to make a huge boundary change to redistribute the population in a way that makes sense. The School Board members are interested in keeping their current positions or being elected to a higher position, they are not going to piss off their constituents with a massive redistricting.

My kid is zoned for South Lakes and we are happy with the school. Redistricting for us would probably lead to his going to Oakton or South Lakes, so I don't have a real dog in the redistricting fight.

You can say it is a boundary thing only but that ignores the fact that it is not. That the School Boards focus on equity and finding band aids to try and staunch the bleeding at the struggling schools is very much the issue. If Lewis and Justice and Herndon and Mt Vernon had better programs and were not struggling with the issues that come from high ESOL and high FARMs students, parents would be less likely to fight a boundary change. You will not get buy in from the voting population for massive redistricting without improving the quality of those schools. That means that you need to address the programs at those schools and at the ES and MS that support them so that the schools can improve.

Or go ahead and stick your head in the sand and keep saying that all it takes is boundary change. Then suggest that kids from Great Falls should be shifted to Herndon while some of the kids from Herndon are shifted to schools that are closer to them and watch the fur fly.

It really does only take a boundary change to drastically change the composition and overall course rigor of a school. Imagine Lewis absorbs 400 WSHS and 100 Edison students through boundary changes which would increase Lewis' population to 2185 students. On average, those 500 new students are of much higher SES and much lower FARMs rate than the current Lewis population. On average, well over 50% of those 500 students would take AP/IB courses according to average AP/IB participation at WSHS and Edison. That's an influx of 250 students to Lewis that now requires the school to expand their advanced course selection.

Meanwhile, in this fairy tale, WSHS and Edison still remain with 2250 and 2150 students, respectively, and their average SES and FARMs would stay effectively the same. Nothing changes at their schools, and all the kids at Lewis get brought up to have similar opportunity. This can be applied to MVHS as well.

So you're going to add a little over 100 per class (probably much less because parents would choose private over lewis) and think that's enough to create a cohort large enough to transform the school?

It won't.

This is not about anything but sour grapes over buying a bigger cheaper house in a lower performing school zone.

+1

[Anonymous]

It’s interesting. Edison HS is as “overenrolled” as WSHS. It’s closer to Lewis, it’s on the same side of the mixing bowl as Lewis, but the Lewis crowd is only obsessively fixated on West Springfield.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:September 2022 FCPS HS enrollments vs. current or planned permanent capacity:

Severely Over-Crowded:

Centreville 133.1%
Chantilly 129.8%
McLean 122.1%

Modestly Over-Crowded to Modestly Under-Enrolled:

West Springfield 105.8%
Woodson 105.6%
Edison 105.2%
Marshall 102.6%
Oakton 102.1%
Robinson 99.9%
Fairfax 97.6%
Annandale 96.4%
Hayfield 96.0%
Westfield 93.8%
Herndon 93.6%
Justice 93.3%
Lake Braddock 92.7%
South Lakes 92.5%
West Potomac 90.8%
South County 90.3%

Significantly Under-Enrolled:
Langley 89.2%
Madison 85.1%
Falls Church 84.1%
TJ 82.5%
Mount Vernon 79.6%
Lewis 78.8%

At some point, FCPS will announce expansion plans for Centreville as part of its upcoming renovation. Chantilly and McLean remain overcrowded with either no solution offered (Chantilly/Stella Pekarsky) or a weak solution put in place that isn't adequately addressing the problem (McLean/Tholen). At the other end of the enrollment spectrum, Mount Vernon remains over 20% under-capacity, yet FCPS just expanded nearby West Potomac to 3000 seats, and Lewis has under 1700 students this fall while West Springfield now has over 2500 kids.

McLean HS needs not to accept students who live in Falls Church. That will solve the overcrowding problem.

It's not like you apply. There are boundaries. Right now FCPS has a high school for roughly every 46,000 residents. McLean has about 50,000 residents, which isn't enough to support two FCPS high schools. So Langley has all of Great Falls, and parts of McLean, Vienna, Reston and Herndon. McLean now has parts of McLean and Falls Church.

However, McLean has 2433 kids this fall and Falls Church has 2103. FCPS being FCPS, they are expanding Falls Church to 2500 seats and leaving McLean with 1993. Since Marshall and McLean are going to be getting more kids from Tysons, there's going to be a push to move the part of Timber Lane (currently a McLean/Falls Church split feeder) that feeds into McLean to Falls Church once Falls Church's renovation is finished. It will reduce the diversity at McLean. Parents at McLean have pleaded for a permanent addition for years and have been ignored. So now it's going to be FCPS left to explain why they are either leaving McLean overcrowded or reducing its diversity.

This does seen like a good boundary solution. We are zoned for FCHS and loved it - and it is going to be beautiful once the renovation is complete. The McLean schools are so overcrowded for years, with no renovation in sight, that I am surprised it has not had an effect on the real estate market there.

There are two overcrowded schools in the McLean pyramid - Kent Gardens ES and McLean HS. The rest are not overcrowded.

I think the market probably assumes that FCPS is rational and would not intentionally destroy one of its highest-performing pyramids. That assumption may be unwarranted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting. Edison HS is as “overenrolled” as WSHS. It’s closer to Lewis, it’s on the same side of the mixing bowl as Lewis, but the Lewis crowd is only obsessively fixated on West Springfield.

It seems more the converse: the West Springfield crowd is obsessively fixated on trying to exclude WSHS from any conversation relating to Lewis.

The focus should be on why Lewis is severely under-capacity and what changes are needed to offer Lewis students opportunities comparable to those available to students at other schools. If West Springfield is part of the solution, so be it; if it is not, that's OK, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting. Edison HS is as “overenrolled” as WSHS. It’s closer to Lewis, it’s on the same side of the mixing bowl as Lewis, but the Lewis crowd is only obsessively fixated on West Springfield.

I suspect the complaints are coming from Saratoga families, or those who bought those huge houses along the Ffx pkwy that are zoned for Lewis. The high school rating was the trade off of getting more house for less money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting. Edison HS is as “overenrolled” as WSHS. It’s closer to Lewis, it’s on the same side of the mixing bowl as Lewis, but the Lewis crowd is only obsessively fixated on West Springfield.

It seems more the converse: the West Springfield crowd is obsessively fixated on trying to exclude WSHS from any conversation relating to Lewis.

The focus should be on why Lewis is severely under-capacity and what changes are needed to offer Lewis students opportunities comparable to those available to students at other schools. If West Springfield is part of the solution, so be it; if it is not, that's OK, too.

Quit trying to make fetch happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting. Edison HS is as “overenrolled” as WSHS. It’s closer to Lewis, it’s on the same side of the mixing bowl as Lewis, but the Lewis crowd is only obsessively fixated on West Springfield.

It seems more the converse: the West Springfield crowd is obsessively fixated on trying to exclude WSHS from any conversation relating to Lewis.

The focus should be on why Lewis is severely under-capacity and what changes are needed to offer Lewis students opportunities comparable to those available to students at other schools. If West Springfield is part of the solution, so be it; if it is not, that's OK, too.

Quit trying to make fetch happen.

Maybe some fetch needs to happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The South Lakes boundary change in 2007 was a major change that moved kids from Oakton, Westfield, and Madison to South Lakes, which at the time had an enrollment of under 1400 (vs. its current enrollment of over 2500). Yes, Janie Strauss made sure that Herndon and Langley stayed out of the boundary study entirely, but many other neighborhoods were moved.

Then, when the enrollment went up more than expected, they built an addition at South Lakes, even when it wasn't scheduled for a full renovation. Now, South Lakes gets a large number of pupil placements for IB, including over 150 kids from Herndon. Had FCPS not done the boundary change, the enrollment would not have increased so much as to require the addition, and had the boundary change not happened and the addition not been built, it wouldn't be getting all the pupil placements now.

It was probably the last purposeful boundary change undertaken with the specific intent of increasing a school's enrollment and aligning its demographic profile more closely with neighboring schools. A lot of people didn't like it, and indeed the backlash may have intimidated School Board members from pursuing similar changes elsewhere, but had they done nothing South Lakes would now be closer to Lewis, both in enrollment and perceived standing, than it is now to other schools like Westfield and Fairfax.

Thanks for the info! It was bigger then I realized. Appreciate that

>>> Then, when the enrollment went up more than expected, they built an addition at South Lakes, even when it wasn't scheduled for a full renovation. Now, South Lakes gets a large number of pupil placements for IB, including over 150 kids from Herndon.

Nope... The Anti-redistricters predicted that they'd be way over-enrolled. They used FCPS numbers, counted the number of kids in the pre-redistricting ESes, and found something like 150 per class were missing from South Lakes. Answer - somehow all the Reston mummies and datties suddenly decided their houses were "too small" when it was time for little Johnny/Janey to go to Hughes/South Lakes... And Tisdadt told the "lady in red" that he simply didn't believe that the redistricted kids would show up.

And... of course... the Astronaut mummies insisted that their kids stay at Herndon - because Herndon had "perfect demographics" yet somehow have decided to send their kids to South Lakes "for IB"...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The South Lakes boundary change in 2007 was a major change that moved kids from Oakton, Westfield, and Madison to South Lakes, which at the time had an enrollment of under 1400 (vs. its current enrollment of over 2500). Yes, Janie Strauss made sure that Herndon and Langley stayed out of the boundary study entirely, but many other neighborhoods were moved.

Then, when the enrollment went up more than expected, they built an addition at South Lakes, even when it wasn't scheduled for a full renovation. Now, South Lakes gets a large number of pupil placements for IB, including over 150 kids from Herndon. Had FCPS not done the boundary change, the enrollment would not have increased so much as to require the addition, and had the boundary change not happened and the addition not been built, it wouldn't be getting all the pupil placements now.

It was probably the last purposeful boundary change undertaken with the specific intent of increasing a school's enrollment and aligning its demographic profile more closely with neighboring schools. A lot of people didn't like it, and indeed the backlash may have intimidated School Board members from pursuing similar changes elsewhere, but had they done nothing South Lakes would now be closer to Lewis, both in enrollment and perceived standing, than it is now to other schools like Westfield and Fairfax.

Thanks for the info! It was bigger then I realized. Appreciate that

>>> Then, when the enrollment went up more than expected, they built an addition at South Lakes, even when it wasn't scheduled for a full renovation. Now, South Lakes gets a large number of pupil placements for IB, including over 150 kids from Herndon.

Nope... The Anti-redistricters predicted that they'd be way over-enrolled. They used FCPS numbers, counted the number of kids in the pre-redistricting ESes, and found something like 150 per class were missing from South Lakes. Answer - somehow all the Reston mummies and datties suddenly decided their houses were "too small" when it was time for little Johnny/Janey to go to Hughes/South Lakes... And Tisdadt told the "lady in red" that he simply didn't believe that the redistricted kids would show up.

And... of course... the Astronaut mummies insisted that their kids stay at Herndon - because Herndon had "perfect demographics" yet somehow have decided to send their kids to South Lakes "for IB"...

Sounds like some lingering resentment there. Be that as it may, if FCPS hadn’t intervened back in 2008 South Lakes would be about the same as Lewis now - much smaller enrollment, much higher poverty rate, and not attracting hundreds of pupil placements.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting. Edison HS is as “overenrolled” as WSHS. It’s closer to Lewis, it’s on the same side of the mixing bowl as Lewis, but the Lewis crowd is only obsessively fixated on West Springfield.

I suspect the complaints are coming from Saratoga families, or those who bought those huge houses along the Ffx pkwy that are zoned for Lewis. The high school rating was the trade off of getting more house for less money.

+1

I suspect you're right. That would explain the weird fixation on WSHS.