Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Using "Democrat" as an adjective instead of "Democratic" is a verbal gang sign.

Russell Baker, writing in 1976:

"The origin of this illiterate phrase, goes back, I believe to the era of Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy ... The chief trouble with 'the Democrat party' is that it makes the Republicans saying it sound both illiterate and coy, and, so, is like a shotgun that is all kick and no fire."

I’m going out on a limb here, but I am betting you weren’t even alive in 1976. I am betting most of the people on this site weren’t.
Who seriously cares about these things?

Republicans do. Otherwise they wouldn't consistently say Democrat where Democratic is the proper term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with the other poster who doesn't believe he will be confirmed and this is a ruse.

I think he'll be confirmed. Trump never backs down from a fight. Manchin and Beitkamp aren't going to risk their necks if it comes down to the wire.

What about the comment he made yesterday on NBC nightly news about if Kavanaugh lied that changes things, because we cannot have anyone lying to congress. Why wouldn't he just maintain a solid front of support? We know he lied to Congress and I can't see how the report could say he didn't. And this is separate from the temperament and partisan issues that were on display last week. I thought the letter from the legal community was especially damaging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you're too drunk to avoid being accused of committing sexual assault, you're kind of asking for it. Guys should watch what they drink.

I love you!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know what I think.

I think the 8 justices currently on SCOTUS are horrified at what is going on. I think that each one of them are thinking... “Geez. I’m glad nobody searched deep into my high school years because there are things there that they would certainly consider disqualifying.” I think they are disgusted that the argument is coming down to what was written in his HS yearbook and the fact that he likes beer.

It’s a travesty. Nobody is a saint. Nobody has made Kavanaugh out to be a saint. He’s human - just like the other 8 justices who have been confirmed. And, simply because people have leveled false allegations at him, we have come to this. It’s pathetic.

I agree that they are likely horrified. I disagree about why. I doubt any of them had this kind of background (even Thomas) that warranted such scrutiny. The issue is the nominee.

He never should have lied about the drinking. He was trying to avoid any possibility that he could have attacked Ford and not remembered, but he just looks ridiculous now. I mean, FFS, he pledged a fraternity and was involved in bar fights. Did he really think nobody would speak up?

Yep, this.

#LeftyLies
He was not “involved in bar fights.” He happened to be present.
He never lied about his drinking.
He did not attack Ford.

The only truth you have stated is that he pledged a fraternity.

You sound desperate. You are just making stuff up. And adding hashtags.

I'm still waiting for your summary of CBFs lies, by the way.

I wasn’t the one who said she lied. But, since you asked. I do believe she made up the whole story. I didn’t believe that at first, but as more is revealed, I do now.
And, given her former boyfriend’s letter to officials, it seems she did lie regarding her fear of flying and her coaching of a friend on a polygraph. She lied to her former boyfriend about credit card charges. Why not now?

Can you explain how she knew that 1) Brett Kavanaugh was a heavy drinker/hard partier in high school/college and 2) that Mike Judge was a heavy drinker/hard partier and 3) that BK and MJ were best friends -- how did she figure this all out years ago so that she could start telling her story about the two in case BK ever got nominated for SCOTUS and she got called to testify against him?

Not one single pro-BK poster has come here to eplain how Ford figured all this out. Because otherwise it's a great coincidence, is it not, that the person she picked to lie about just happened to be a hard-drinking lout in high school and college and had a best buddy who was also a hard-drinking lout. She had to have done serious research to find this out so that she could make her lies ring true. Please explain. The notion that she saw his name in the paper in 2012 when he was nominated for a judgeship, saw he was about her age and went to GT Prep, and then started researching and somehow discovered he was a huge drinker and had a best friend named Mike Judge who was also a drinker, so then she started telling her tale in the event she could use it, is too incredible to believe. She would have had to talk to others whom BK acknowledges he knows to find all this out. Where are those people saying she called or wrote them asking for dirt on him? So far haven't heard anyone come forward and say, hey CBF contacted me in 2012 asking if I knew BK and what was he like.

To me the simple solution to this question is the one that makes the most sense: she did know BK, she did know MJ, this did happen to her, she is telling the truth.

She read Mark Judge's novel. It's all in there, the Safeway job ...

We don't have her 2012 therapists notes. We don't know what's in there. One thing is certain Kavanaugh's name was not mentioned in the notes.

How did she know to even read Judge’s book? It’s not like it was a best seller. How did she know that Bart O’Kavanaugh was actually some guy named Brett Kavanaugh who was now a conservative lawyer/ judge or on his way to becoming a judge so therefore she picked him to be the target of her wiley ways?

I mean you guys have a lot to explain here, how this all came about and fell into place so smoothly if she didn’t know both BK and MJ. Come on now - if she were completely lying why didn’t she tell more people, why didn’t she name him to her therapist if she wanted to concoct a story? It seems like one of the reasons you don’t believe her is because she didn’t name him during her therapy sessions. So if she had been concocting this elaborate ruse for years, don’t you think she would have made it more blatant? Answer me this.

Her own testimony:

MITCHELL: OK. Can you describe all of the other social interactions that you had with Mr. Kavanaugh?

FORD: Briefly, yes I can. There were during freshman and sophomore year, particularly my sophomore year which would have been his junior year of high school, four to five parties that my friends and I attended that were attended also by him.

She had been at other parties where Kavanaugh was. He was very likely with his friends. She knew this.

He denied knowing her. So who's lying? You sound like you don't believe him but that you believe that she knew him and that she was at parties with him. What's your theory, then, why she picked him out to destroy out of all the boys in those circles?

He may not have known her.. but she evidently knew him. She said her connection to him was through the guy she was dating. There were lots of people in HS and college that may not have known me, but I knew them.
Why she picked him out? I’ll leave that to you to figure out. As my mom used to say, “God gave you a brain. Use it."

No, you're the one alleging that she targeted him with a convoluted ruse to bring him down. You have to convince me why she would do that. I don't see any evidence why she would. Not a single thing that makes me say, wow she had it out for him for years.

Unless, of course, he had assaulted her.

Hmmm... according to her, she first disclosed his name to her husband in 2012. Why is that date significant? Because, he was on the short list for Romney in the event he won the presidency and SCOTUS had a vacancy. Is it making sense now?

No, it doesn't. Why did she have such venom for this particular person on a short list for SCOTUS back in 2012. You need to convince me that she, who didn't work in politics, wasn't a laywer, and who moved far away from DC, was keeping close track of possible SCOTUS nominees (really?? I keep close track of politics and I had no idea he was on a short list back in 2012) -- why she hated him so much that she then started her ruse to take him down, that she was preparing to go for the long term should he be nominated, all out of some apparently random hatred for him.

Seems pretty convoluted to me.

Because I think she was assaulted, but not by Kavanaugh. She confabulated two separate stories, used elements of the truth and attached made up parts about Kavanaugh. She merged Kavanaugh into her existing story. She happened to have dated Squi and knew some details about Kavanaugh and his friends. She was absolutely gleeful during her testimony.

Interesting. You believe she is a sexual assault survivor. Yet you try to undermine her by calling her "absolutely gleeful" during her testimony. That's a new one. I've yet to hear anyone else think that her sober gentleness was "absolutely gleeful."

Oh and by the way. You believe she is a sexual assault survivor. So what do you think of your president taunting her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

He and the white house had already asked for the picture showing them both in the wedding party - and had the picture when he said he wasnt sure if they were both at the wedding.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Well she has been paying attention to high court judges/nominees for a long time. Brett's stories were reported heavily this year, so did his friend Mark Judge's. She researched it well and made up her story based on the book. Remember only in 2018, she identified BK by name and only in 2018 she mentioned Mark's Safeway job.

Explain this. Ford contacted the office of her Congressional Representative Anna Eschoo and the Washington Post on July 6. I'll even rely on RWNJ favorite the Gateway Pundit for that cite;

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/must-see-updated-timeline-of-christine-blasey-fords-contacts-with-democrats/

Kavanaugh was not nominated until three days later on July 9.

At the time Ford contacted Eschoo and the Post, Trump was considering a shortlist of 5 candidates:

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-supreme-court-nominee-shortlist-3-main-qualities-2018-6

So how did Ford know to prepare her allegations against Kavanaugh and why haven't accusers come out with allegations against the others on the shortlist?

That's the one she knew. She wanted him off the short list. My guess is this has something to do with they boy she dated for a few months, who was Kavanaugh's friend, and some good old fashioned vindictive behavior.

[Anonymous]

Doesn't Brett Kavanaugh's strong desire to be a Supreme Court justice count for anything?

If you think about it,

1) he has humiliated himself (and wife and children) by lying about many things, BUT they are things that he HAD to lie about or the liberals would have torn him down. He sadly had no choice.

2) he admitted he was virgin all through high school and college and for "many years after." That had to be an embarrassing thing for him to admit, especially having run with a kind of sporty crowd who like to see themselves as being good with the ladies.

3) he cried and sniffled a lot in his testimony in order to show the cynics how much be cared. Think what you will of his tears, but he had to do this (cry) or the liberals wouldve jumped all over him for being insincere.

And after all this, Mr. Kavanaugh STILL wants to be on the Supreme Court! He has shown he will say or do whatever it takes to get the job (and get the job done!) Maybe we ought to respect that!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know what I think.

I think the 8 justices currently on SCOTUS are horrified at what is going on. I think that each one of them are thinking... “Geez. I’m glad nobody searched deep into my high school years because there are things there that they would certainly consider disqualifying.” I think they are disgusted that the argument is coming down to what was written in his HS yearbook and the fact that he likes beer.

It’s a travesty. Nobody is a saint. Nobody has made Kavanaugh out to be a saint. He’s human - just like the other 8 justices who have been confirmed. And, simply because people have leveled false allegations at him, we have come to this. It’s pathetic.

I agree that they are likely horrified. I disagree about why. I doubt any of them had this kind of background (even Thomas) that warranted such scrutiny. The issue is the nominee.

He never should have lied about the drinking. He was trying to avoid any possibility that he could have attacked Ford and not remembered, but he just looks ridiculous now. I mean, FFS, he pledged a fraternity and was involved in bar fights. Did he really think nobody would speak up?

Yep, this.

#LeftyLies
He was not “involved in bar fights.” He happened to be present.
He never lied about his drinking.
He did not attack Ford.

The only truth you have stated is that he pledged a fraternity.

You sound desperate. You are just making stuff up. And adding hashtags.

I'm still waiting for your summary of CBFs lies, by the way.

I wasn’t the one who said she lied. But, since you asked. I do believe she made up the whole story. I didn’t believe that at first, but as more is revealed, I do now.
And, given her former boyfriend’s letter to officials, it seems she did lie regarding her fear of flying and her coaching of a friend on a polygraph. She lied to her former boyfriend about credit card charges. Why not now?

Can you explain how she knew that 1) Brett Kavanaugh was a heavy drinker/hard partier in high school/college and 2) that Mike Judge was a heavy drinker/hard partier and 3) that BK and MJ were best friends -- how did she figure this all out years ago so that she could start telling her story about the two in case BK ever got nominated for SCOTUS and she got called to testify against him?

Not one single pro-BK poster has come here to eplain how Ford figured all this out. Because otherwise it's a great coincidence, is it not, that the person she picked to lie about just happened to be a hard-drinking lout in high school and college and had a best buddy who was also a hard-drinking lout. She had to have done serious research to find this out so that she could make her lies ring true. Please explain. The notion that she saw his name in the paper in 2012 when he was nominated for a judgeship, saw he was about her age and went to GT Prep, and then started researching and somehow discovered he was a huge drinker and had a best friend named Mike Judge who was also a drinker, so then she started telling her tale in the event she could use it, is too incredible to believe. She would have had to talk to others whom BK acknowledges he knows to find all this out. Where are those people saying she called or wrote them asking for dirt on him? So far haven't heard anyone come forward and say, hey CBF contacted me in 2012 asking if I knew BK and what was he like.

To me the simple solution to this question is the one that makes the most sense: she did know BK, she did know MJ, this did happen to her, she is telling the truth.

She read Mark Judge's novel. It's all in there, the Safeway job ...

We don't have her 2012 therapists notes. We don't know what's in there. One thing is certain Kavanaugh's name was not mentioned in the notes.

How did she know to even read Judge’s book? It’s not like it was a best seller. How did she know that Bart O’Kavanaugh was actually some guy named Brett Kavanaugh who was now a conservative lawyer/ judge or on his way to becoming a judge so therefore she picked him to be the target of her wiley ways?

I mean you guys have a lot to explain here, how this all came about and fell into place so smoothly if she didn’t know both BK and MJ. Come on now - if she were completely lying why didn’t she tell more people, why didn’t she name him to her therapist if she wanted to concoct a story? It seems like one of the reasons you don’t believe her is because she didn’t name him during her therapy sessions. So if she had been concocting this elaborate ruse for years, don’t you think she would have made it more blatant? Answer me this.

Her own testimony:

MITCHELL: OK. Can you describe all of the other social interactions that you had with Mr. Kavanaugh?

FORD: Briefly, yes I can. There were during freshman and sophomore year, particularly my sophomore year which would have been his junior year of high school, four to five parties that my friends and I attended that were attended also by him.

She had been at other parties where Kavanaugh was. He was very likely with his friends. She knew this.

He denied knowing her. So who's lying? You sound like you don't believe him but that you believe that she knew him and that she was at parties with him. What's your theory, then, why she picked him out to destroy out of all the boys in those circles?

He may not have known her.. but she evidently knew him. She said her connection to him was through the guy she was dating. There were lots of people in HS and college that may not have known me, but I knew them.
Why she picked him out? I’ll leave that to you to figure out. As my mom used to say, “God gave you a brain. Use it."

No, you're the one alleging that she targeted him with a convoluted ruse to bring him down. You have to convince me why she would do that. I don't see any evidence why she would. Not a single thing that makes me say, wow she had it out for him for years.

Unless, of course, he had assaulted her.

Hmmm... according to her, she first disclosed his name to her husband in 2012. Why is that date significant? Because, he was on the short list for Romney in the event he won the presidency and SCOTUS had a vacancy. Is it making sense now?

No, it doesn't. Why did she have such venom for this particular person on a short list for SCOTUS back in 2012. You need to convince me that she, who didn't work in politics, wasn't a laywer, and who moved far away from DC, was keeping close track of possible SCOTUS nominees (really?? I keep close track of politics and I had no idea he was on a short list back in 2012) -- why she hated him so much that she then started her ruse to take him down, that she was preparing to go for the long term should he be nominated, all out of some apparently random hatred for him.

Seems pretty convoluted to me.

Because I think she was assaulted, but not by Kavanaugh. She confabulated two separate stories, used elements of the truth and attached made up parts about Kavanaugh. She merged Kavanaugh into her existing story. She happened to have dated Squi and knew some details about Kavanaugh and his friends. She was absolutely gleeful during her testimony.

Can you please point to the part in her testimony where you thought she was "gleeful?" You don't even have to link to the clip. I'll find it if you can tell me about when it was or what she was discussing when you detected "glee."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
So much winning!!!!! Brett will soon be on SCOTUS and I hope he trolls you by swearing in as "Bart."

That would be EPIC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Brett Kavanaugh's strong desire to be a Supreme Court justice count for anything?

If you think about it,

1) he has humiliated himself (and wife and children) by lying about many things, BUT they are things that he HAD to lie about or the liberals would have torn him down. He sadly had no choice.

2) he admitted he was virgin all through high school and college and for "many years after." That had to be an embarrassing thing for him to admit, especially having run with a kind of sporty crowd who like to see themselves as being good with the ladies.

3) he cried and sniffled a lot in his testimony in order to show the cynics how much be cared. Think what you will of his tears, but he had to do this (cry) or the liberals wouldve jumped all over him for being insincere.

And after all this, Mr. Kavanaugh STILL wants to be on the Supreme Court! He has shown he will say or do whatever it takes to get the job (and get the job done!) Maybe we ought to respect that!

At this point, if he isn't confirmed, he may have to join Judge at the bro-safehouse at the beach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

Ramirez was a bridesmaid and Kavanaugh was a groomsman. That's why they are both in that picture. With them both in the same wedding party I'm quite positive he knew she was at that wedding. Which is why he was frantically texting people to get a picture.

But thanks for your completely useless input.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Brett Kavanaugh's strong desire to be a Supreme Court justice count for anything?

If you think about it,

1) he has humiliated himself (and wife and children) by lying about many things, BUT they are things that he HAD to lie about or the liberals would have torn him down. He sadly had no choice.

2) he admitted he was virgin all through high school and college and for "many years after." That had to be an embarrassing thing for him to admit, especially having run with a kind of sporty crowd who like to see themselves as being good with the ladies.

3) he cried and sniffled a lot in his testimony in order to show the cynics how much be cared. Think what you will of his tears, but he had to do this (cry) or the liberals wouldve jumped all over him for being insincere.

And after all this, Mr. Kavanaugh STILL wants to be on the Supreme Court! He has shown he will say or do whatever it takes to get the job (and get the job done!) Maybe we ought to respect that!

At this point, if he isn't confirmed, he may have to join Judge at the bro-safehouse at the beach.

The ralphatorium?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

Ramirez was a bridesmaid and Kavanaugh was a groomsman. That's why they are both in that picture. With them both in the same wedding party I'm quite positive he knew she was at that wedding. Which is why he was frantically texting people to get a picture.

But thanks for your completely useless input.

You know.... I was a bridesmaid in my sister’s wedding. I cannot name one groomsman. Not one. I wouldn’t recognize any of them on the street and I would likely swear in court I had never met any of them unless I was told they were in my sister’s wedding. This was about 32 years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Well she has been paying attention to high court judges/nominees for a long time. Brett's stories were reported heavily this year, so did his friend Mark Judge's. She researched it well and made up her story based on the book. Remember only in 2018, she identified BK by name and only in 2018 she mentioned Mark's Safeway job.

Explain this. Ford contacted the office of her Congressional Representative Anna Eschoo and the Washington Post on July 6. I'll even rely on RWNJ favorite the Gateway Pundit for that cite;

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/must-see-updated-timeline-of-christine-blasey-fords-contacts-with-democrats/

Kavanaugh was not nominated until three days later on July 9.

At the time Ford contacted Eschoo and the Post, Trump was considering a shortlist of 5 candidates:

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-supreme-court-nominee-shortlist-3-main-qualities-2018-6

So how did Ford know to prepare her allegations against Kavanaugh and why haven't accusers come out with allegations against the others on the shortlist?

That's the one she knew. She wanted him off the short list. My guess is this has something to do with they boy she dated for a few months, who was Kavanaugh's friend, and some good old fashioned vindictive behavior.

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/736075.page

I started the above thread on June 27. Even a casual political junky knew Kavanaugh's name well before the announcement on July 9.

[Anonymous]

I’m just going to say it, Bret Kavanaugh is the type of guy who would join the Conta Kai dojo and would sweep Dainel’s leg.