Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

Ramirez was a bridesmaid and Kavanaugh was a groomsman. That's why they are both in that picture. With them both in the same wedding party I'm quite positive he knew she was at that wedding. Which is why he was frantically texting people to get a picture.

But thanks for your completely useless input.

You know.... I was a bridesmaid in my sister’s wedding. I cannot name one groomsman. Not one. I wouldn’t recognize any of them on the street and I would likely swear in court I had never met any of them unless I was told they were in my sister’s wedding. This was about 32 years ago.

They (Bride, Groom, BK and CBF) were all classmates from Yale. This is not the same thing as not knowing your BIL's friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

Ramirez was a bridesmaid and Kavanaugh was a groomsman. That's why they are both in that picture. With them both in the same wedding party I'm quite positive he knew she was at that wedding. Which is why he was frantically texting people to get a picture.

But thanks for your completely useless input.

So she knew the bride and he knew the groom. You've never been in a wedding where you knew OF someone but didn't know them or consider them a friend?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Brett Kavanaugh's strong desire to be a Supreme Court justice count for anything?

If you think about it,

1) he has humiliated himself (and wife and children) by lying about many things, BUT they are things that he HAD to lie about or the liberals would have torn him down. He sadly had no choice.

2) he admitted he was virgin all through high school and college and for "many years after." That had to be an embarrassing thing for him to admit, especially having run with a kind of sporty crowd who like to see themselves as being good with the ladies.


3) he cried and sniffled a lot in his testimony in order to show the cynics how much be cared. Think what you will of his tears, but he had to do this (cry) or the liberals wouldve jumped all over him for being insincere.

And after all this, Mr. Kavanaugh STILL wants to be on the Supreme Court! He has shown he will say or do whatever it takes to get the job (and get the job done!) Maybe we ought to respect that!

***[b][b] What he meant was that no woman was willing to have sex with him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

Ramirez was a bridesmaid and Kavanaugh was a groomsman. That's why they are both in that picture. With them both in the same wedding party I'm quite positive he knew she was at that wedding. Which is why he was frantically texting people to get a picture.

But thanks for your completely useless input.

So she knew the bride and he knew the groom. You've never been in a wedding where you knew OF someone but didn't know them or consider them a friend?

Why are you arguing about this? We already know as a fact that Kavanaugh was texting/emailing people to get a picture from the wedding BEFORE the New Yorker article came out, and maybe as early as July. He lied when he said he first learned of Ramirez's allegation when the article came out. That's why Kerry Berchem wants the FBI to get the texts.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:So she knew the bride and he knew the groom. You've never been in a wedding where you knew OF someone but didn't know them or consider them a friend?

Do you people even read? He knew her well enough to text the bride to ask for the photo in which they both appeared. He did that before her allegation was made public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Brett Kavanaugh's strong desire to be a Supreme Court justice count for anything?

If you think about it,

1) he has humiliated himself (and wife and children) by lying about many things, BUT they are things that he HAD to lie about or the liberals would have torn him down. He sadly had no choice.

2) he admitted he was virgin all through high school and college and for "many years after." That had to be an embarrassing thing for him to admit, especially having run with a kind of sporty crowd who like to see themselves as being good with the ladies.


3) he cried and sniffled a lot in his testimony in order to show the cynics how much be cared. Think what you will of his tears, but he had to do this (cry) or the liberals wouldve jumped all over him for being insincere.

And after all this, Mr. Kavanaugh STILL wants to be on the Supreme Court! He has shown he will say or do whatever it takes to get the job (and get the job done!) Maybe we ought to respect that!

***[b][b] What he meant was that no woman was willing to have sex with him.

And, this is the kind of crap that bothers many of us.
If we dare to question Ford’s account, or if we point out that her testimony is inconsistent and has no real corroborative evidence, we are crucified and called “insensitive to victims/survivors.”
But, comments like this are fair game here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

Ramirez was a bridesmaid and Kavanaugh was a groomsman. That's why they are both in that picture. With them both in the same wedding party I'm quite positive he knew she was at that wedding. Which is why he was frantically texting people to get a picture.

But thanks for your completely useless input.

So she knew the bride and he knew the groom. You've never been in a wedding where you knew OF someone but didn't know them or consider them a friend?

Why are you arguing about this? We already know as a fact that Kavanaugh was texting/emailing people to get a picture from the wedding BEFORE the New Yorker article came out, and maybe as early as July. He lied when he said he first learned of Ramirez's allegation when the article came out. That's why Kerry Berchem wants the FBI to get the texts.

He evidently got wind that she was alleging something and wanted to see who she was - he didn’t remember her. Why is this such a scandal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

Ramirez was a bridesmaid and Kavanaugh was a groomsman. That's why they are both in that picture. With them both in the same wedding party I'm quite positive he knew she was at that wedding. Which is why he was frantically texting people to get a picture.

But thanks for your completely useless input.

You know.... I was a bridesmaid in my sister’s wedding. I cannot name one groomsman. Not one. I wouldn’t recognize any of them on the street and I would likely swear in court I had never met any of them unless I was told they were in my sister’s wedding. This was about 32 years ago.

They (Bride, Groom, BK and CBF) were all classmates from Yale. This is not the same thing as not knowing your BIL's friends.

None of that matter. I was in a friend's wedding and didnt' know any of the other groomsmen and only knew one of the bridesmaids because we ran in different circles on the whole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Brett Kavanaugh's strong desire to be a Supreme Court justice count for anything?

If you think about it,

1) he has humiliated himself (and wife and children) by lying about many things, BUT they are things that he HAD to lie about or the liberals would have torn him down. He sadly had no choice.

2) he admitted he was virgin all through high school and college and for "many years after." That had to be an embarrassing thing for him to admit, especially having run with a kind of sporty crowd who like to see themselves as being good with the ladies.


3) he cried and sniffled a lot in his testimony in order to show the cynics how much be cared. Think what you will of his tears, but he had to do this (cry) or the liberals wouldve jumped all over him for being insincere.

And after all this, Mr. Kavanaugh STILL wants to be on the Supreme Court! He has shown he will say or do whatever it takes to get the job (and get the job done!) Maybe we ought to respect that!

***[b][b] What he meant was that no woman was willing to have sex with him.

And, this is the kind of crap that bothers many of us.
If we dare to question Ford’s account, or if we point out that her testimony is inconsistent and has no real corroborative evidence, we are crucified and called “insensitive to victims/survivors.”
But, comments like this are fair game here.

Dude, he's the one who had FFFF in his calendar, the calendar HE introduced as evidence!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed else where in the previous pages, but did he not lie when he said he never went buy Bart' when asked during his testimony? He signed off his beach week note as Bart.

I think he didn't quite deny it, but he definitely showed a lack of candor on the question. He gave some kind of non-responsive answer like "you'd have to ask him."

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So she knew the bride and he knew the groom. You've never been in a wedding where you knew OF someone but didn't know them or consider them a friend?

Do you people even read? He knew her well enough to text the bride to ask for the photo in which they both appeared. He did that before her allegation was made public.

Where's the text? See that's the problem with a lot of this. Let me guess. No one wants to see the text right because...Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Brett Kavanaugh's strong desire to be a Supreme Court justice count for anything?

If you think about it,

1) he has humiliated himself (and wife and children) by lying about many things, BUT they are things that he HAD to lie about or the liberals would have torn him down. He sadly had no choice.

2) he admitted he was virgin all through high school and college and for "many years after." That had to be an embarrassing thing for him to admit, especially having run with a kind of sporty crowd who like to see themselves as being good with the ladies.


3) he cried and sniffled a lot in his testimony in order to show the cynics how much be cared. Think what you will of his tears, but he had to do this (cry) or the liberals wouldve jumped all over him for being insincere.

And after all this, Mr. Kavanaugh STILL wants to be on the Supreme Court! He has shown he will say or do whatever it takes to get the job (and get the job done!) Maybe we ought to respect that!

***[b][b] What he meant was that no woman was willing to have sex with him.

And, this is the kind of crap that bothers many of us.
If we dare to question Ford’s account, or if we point out that her testimony is inconsistent and has no real corroborative evidence, we are crucified and called “insensitive to victims/survivors.”
But, comments like this are fair game here.

Thank you. I actually started to tap out a response to that comment but was so furious about it that I didn't post.

The answer to your unspoken question is that Kavanaugh is the very epitome of the group against whom leftists welcome derogatory, bigoted, and racist comments: affluent white males.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Akin Gump partner who has text messages that may show that Bart lied about his knowledge of Debbie Ramirez and a wedding they both attended, STILL has not heard from the FBI.
This is her letter of this morning that was shared with me on FB.

From: Kerry Berchem
Date: October 3, 2018 at 6:23:28 AM EDT
To: "--------. (DO) (FBI)"
Subject: FOLLOWING UP AGAIN Urgent: Ramirez Allegations
Agent ---------,
I appreciate your email below advising me to call the field office. Indeed, in addition to my sending you several emails below and logging into the PAL portal twice and having a representative speak with the New Haven CT field office (which advised that they had no jurisdiction), I called the Bridgeport CT FBI field office Monday at 9:45 am. I spoke with and left messages with three (3) different people.
I suppose you know this already but no one called me back. Really? The FBI is so busy that it cannot spare one agent to call me back? How can th]}e FBI - or anyone else for that matter - conclude that the information that I have and the questions they pose are without merit if they have not been answered? I do not know what the texts I have may mean or may not mean. But, then again, neither does the FBI. It hasn’t reviewed them.
In my professional capacity, I have been part of teams that have conducted internal and SEC investigations for public companies. Litigation hold notices go out. Emails and texts are reviewed. People questioned. No stone is unturned.
All I wanted when I reached out to the FBI on Sunday was to perform my civic duty, to have a private discussion with the FBI and to possibly assist in the investigation ordered by President Trump. I believed in “the process.” It is now Wednesday morning, almost three full days since I sent you my draft memorandum, which was subsequently leaked to the press without my permission. Can you offer any explanation - any explanation whatsoever - as to why the FBI has refused to follow up on a “tip” from me, a law abiding, tax paying private citizen?
Regards,
Kerry E. Berchem

I have attended many weddings where people went to my high school/college and I simply knew OF them, but did not KNOW them.

They were both in the bridal party

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So she knew the bride and he knew the groom. You've never been in a wedding where you knew OF someone but didn't know them or consider them a friend?

Do you people even read? He knew her well enough to text the bride to ask for the photo in which they both appeared. He did that before her allegation was made public.

Where's the text? See that's the problem with a lot of this. Let me guess. No one wants to see the text right because...Trump?

The woman that has the texts has been begging the FBI to contact her. There was a copy of her email to the FBI earlier in this thread. Also, I don't think the issue is whether or not Kavanaugh knew her. The issue is whether he has spoke about the alleged incident prior to it being published. He testified that he hadn't but the = texts show that he did.

[Anonymous]

Kavanuagh's interview with Senate staff on Sept 25 - https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/09.25.18%20BMK%20Interview%20Transcript%20(Redacted).pdf

Did you interact with Ms. Ramirez at the
wedding?

22 Judge Kavanaugh. I'm sure -- I'm sure I saw her
23 because it wasn't a huge wedding. And at any wedding, you
24 would see the people that you went to school with. But I
25 don't have a specific recollection.

******************

Berchem's texts with Yarasavage shed light on Kavanaugh’s personal contact with friends, including that he obtained a copy of a photograph of a small group of friends from Yale at a 1997 wedding in order to show himself smiling alongside Ramirez 10 years after they graduated. Both were in the wedding party: Kavanaugh was a groomsman and Ramirez a bridesmaid at the wedding.

On Sept, 22nd, Yarasavage texted Berchem that she had shared the photo with “Brett’s team.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/mutual-friend-ramirez-kavanaugh-anxious-come-forward-evidence-n915566