Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m pro-Amber, but her agent’s claim that her career would have been similar to Ana De Armas if it wasn’t for the bad press is delusional. She was right about everything else, but that part was odd.

Yes, bad press didn't help either of their careers but there are also entirely logical reasons both lost roles: her less-than-impressive talent and his horrible unprofessionalism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah the misogyny in this thread has been incredibly strong. I'm so glad people are getting called out on it now. I thought I was in some parallel universe where these viewpoints were normal and de rigeur.

Gotta pull out the misogyny word any time a woman gets criticized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah the misogyny in this thread has been incredibly strong. I'm so glad people are getting called out on it now. I thought I was in some parallel universe where these viewpoints were normal and de rigeur.

Gotta pull out the misogyny word any time a woman gets criticized.

The stuff said on this board about Heard is more than mere "criticism." Sheesh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

Why aren’t people also mentioning that he was aging out of his weird roles. Willie wonka, Alice in Wonderkabd, pirates. A creepy old man no longer works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

Why aren’t people also mentioning that he was aging out of his weird roles. Willie wonka, Alice in Wonderkabd, pirates. A creepy old man no longer works.

Because there are still a lot of roles for older men. Robert DeNiro and Christopher Walken still get roles. Christopher Lee who usually played horror and villain roles was still acting until he died.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

A standard you don’t hold Johnny Depp to

What are you talking about? You don’t even know my point of view. I was in an abusive relationship myself, so instead of making assumptions, perhaps next time ask questions before going on a rampage.

I am the standard poster, not the one who called you an ahole. Just observing that it is hypocritical to be so offended by the pp calling you an ahole but not by him saying he wanted to kill here and r*ape her corpse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

A standard you don’t hold Johnny Depp to

What are you talking about? You don’t even know my point of view. I was in an abusive relationship myself, so instead of making assumptions, perhaps next time ask questions before going on a rampage.

I am the standard poster, not the one who called you an ahole. Just observing that it is hypocritical to be so offended by the pp calling you an ahole but not by him saying he wanted to kill here and r*ape her corpse

When Depp does that he’s doing a deft bit of parody, much like Graham Chapman only funnier and sexier.

When the I Was Abused So I Know poster pipes up and is told to stick to relevant stuff and to quit being an asshole, she’s being subjected to a rampage....again. We know so little of her suffering, but its completely germane to this trial between famous strangers, one of whom is obviously a witch who does or doesn’t float. It all makes sense!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

Why aren’t people also mentioning that he was aging out of his weird roles. Willie wonka, Alice in Wonderkabd, pirates. A creepy old man no longer works.

Because there are still a lot of roles for older men. Robert DeNiro and Christopher Walken still get roles. Christopher Lee who usually played horror and villain roles was still acting until he died.

Will Wonka and the Mad Hatter are not "young" roles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

Why aren’t people also mentioning that he was aging out of his weird roles. Willie wonka, Alice in Wonderkabd, pirates. A creepy old man no longer works.

Because there are still a lot of roles for older men. Robert DeNiro and Christopher Walken still get roles. Christopher Lee who usually played horror and villain roles was still acting until he died.

Omg. Are you serious. They don’t fit into the same mold as depp and his prior weird roles. Good try though Depp PR machine.

[Anonymous]

I don't think any Pro AH or Pro JD posters are taking all facts into consideration. They are taking in facts that suit whatever they want to believe, then ignoring the rest. No different than most everything about US politics at this point So frustrating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

A standard you don’t hold Johnny Depp to

What are you talking about? You don’t even know my point of view. I was in an abusive relationship myself, so instead of making assumptions, perhaps next time ask questions before going on a rampage.

I am the standard poster, not the one who called you an ahole. Just observing that it is hypocritical to be so offended by the pp calling you an ahole but not by him saying he wanted to kill here and r*ape her corpse

When Depp does that he’s doing a deft bit of parody, much like Graham Chapman only funnier and sexier.

When the I Was Abused So I Know poster pipes up and is told to stick to relevant stuff and to quit being an asshole, she’s being subjected to a rampage....again. We know so little of her suffering, but its completely germane to this trial between famous strangers, one of whom is obviously a witch who does or doesn’t float. It all makes sense!

DP. Can’t say I see what’s sexy about a violent drunk/drug addict, but I guess some people are into that kind of dysfunction?

[Anonymous]

No consequence for Amber Heard completely ignoring the judge's instructions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No consequence for Amber Heard completely ignoring the judge's instructions?

m

Whatever this is about, apparently the judge was unconcerned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

AH’s new PR Team has found DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

Yeah, it’s been well established that he has been an alky and druggie for decades. Despite that, he was still getting acting gigs, so what. I think it shows opposite of what you think it shows.