Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

I believe he lost roles. The me too movement doesn’t allow studios to give actors a chance. They are guilty and move on with the next guy. I believe him. He was honest about his alcohol and drug use so no surprise there. Ellen Barkin was an angry jilted lover and Amber’s sister is sticking up for her sister. He is going to win this trial and hopefully work again. She is just not believable. She lies too much.

Holy crow. At least you’re honest, online at least. I hope you’re open with your views so people can keep their distance.

Wow, pp has a screw loose. His transparency about substance abuse—by the way he’s never admitted he has a serious problem, which he clearly does—means that studios should simply accept losing millions in extra production costs when he strolls on set hours late and unprepared?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

I believe he lost roles. The me too movement doesn’t allow studios to give actors a chance. They are guilty and move on with the next guy. I believe him. He was honest about his alcohol and drug use so no surprise there. Ellen Barkin was an angry jilted lover and Amber’s sister is sticking up for her sister. He is going to win this trial and hopefully work again. She is just not believable. She lies too much.

Holy crow. At least you’re honest, online at least. I hope you’re open with your views so people can keep their distance.

Wow, pp has a screw loose. His transparency about substance abuse—by the way he’s never admitted he has a serious problem, which he clearly does—means that studios should simply accept losing millions in extra production costs when he strolls on set hours late and unprepared?

Her post should be pinned. The underbelly of what the Depp supporters feel is acknowledged in her post, and it’s incredibly ugly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

I believe he lost roles. The me too movement doesn’t allow studios to give actors a chance. They are guilty and move on with the next guy. I believe him. He was honest about his alcohol and drug use so no surprise there. Ellen Barkin was an angry jilted lover and Amber’s sister is sticking up for her sister. He is going to win this trial and hopefully work again. She is just not believable. She lies too much.

He lost roles because he shut down production for a month. If you don’t go to jail me too doesn’t mean sh*t. See Louis CK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are people here still so in love with Depp from his Pirates movies or his 21 jump street days? I don't understand how people are supporting him and calling Heard trash. Like, you know he's not going to marry you for supporting him, right? He's not reading this board!

It is more that Heard seemed to panic when there was no child support plus record of her abuse and she wasn't get a killing from the divorce. Heard seems like she is generically pretty/photogenic and forgettably so-so in acting and was never going to achieve the money that a hot, super-talented actor would. So she did what she thought she needed to do severely exaggerating a fake 90 degree angle bruise that looked more like a door slammed her face. She also underestimated the psychological understanding of those who have been through actual domestic assault. She doesn't have the emotional impact those who have been hit by someone/thing a man's strength has.

When the National Enquirer or The Sun tabloid libels someone, they aren't the stepmother and maternal figure of teens. Her lie was exceptionally cruel to her school-age stepkids and she is still trying to milk money. Depp lost way more than $50 mil, but wants his name cleared for his kids. He's no peach with four failed LTRs/marriages and he CHOOSES jerks when he obviously could have gotten a girl who wasn't a lesbian with priors.

No it isn't lust, but a slam to anyone who now has to go through that much more after getting ACTUALLY hit by a man.

This is from pg 23. Is this a jaw-dropping read to anyone else? Is this how you all really think? Because goddamn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are people here still so in love with Depp from his Pirates movies or his 21 jump street days? I don't understand how people are supporting him and calling Heard trash. Like, you know he's not going to marry you for supporting him, right? He's not reading this board!

It is more that Heard seemed to panic when there was no child support plus record of her abuse and she wasn't get a killing from the divorce. Heard seems like she is generically pretty/photogenic and forgettably so-so in acting and was never going to achieve the money that a hot, super-talented actor would. So she did what she thought she needed to do severely exaggerating a fake 90 degree angle bruise that looked more like a door slammed her face. She also underestimated the psychological understanding of those who have been through actual domestic assault. She doesn't have the emotional impact those who have been hit by someone/thing a man's strength has.

When the National Enquirer or The Sun tabloid libels someone, they aren't the stepmother and maternal figure of teens. Her lie was exceptionally cruel to her school-age stepkids and she is still trying to milk money. Depp lost way more than $50 mil, but wants his name cleared for his kids. He's no peach with four failed LTRs/marriages and he CHOOSES jerks when he obviously could have gotten a girl who wasn't a lesbian with priors.

No it isn't lust, but a slam to anyone who now has to go through that much more after getting ACTUALLY hit by a man.

This is from pg 23. Is this a jaw-dropping read to anyone else? Is this how you all really think? Because goddamn.

PP very like is, themselves, an abuser.

[Anonymous]

Sounds like today is a couple AH boosters posting over and over. Weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

I believe he lost roles. The me too movement doesn’t allow studios to give actors a chance. They are guilty and move on with the next guy. I believe him. He was honest about his alcohol and drug use so no surprise there. Ellen Barkin was an angry jilted lover and Amber’s sister is sticking up for her sister. He is going to win this trial and hopefully work again. She is just not believable. She lies too much.

Holy crow. At least you’re honest, online at least. I hope you’re open with your views so people can keep their distance.

Wow, pp has a screw loose. His transparency about substance abuse—by the way he’s never admitted he has a serious problem, which he clearly does—means that studios should simply accept losing millions in extra production costs when he strolls on set hours late and unprepared?

Her post should be pinned. The underbelly of what the Depp supporters feel is acknowledged in her post, and it’s incredibly ugly.

Absolutely. Poor innocent Johnny.

[Anonymous]

Yeah the misogyny in this thread has been incredibly strong. I'm so glad people are getting called out on it now. I thought I was in some parallel universe where these viewpoints were normal and de rigeur.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah the misogyny in this thread has been incredibly strong. I'm so glad people are getting called out on it now. I thought I was in some parallel universe where these viewpoints were normal and de rigeur.

I just came to this thread a couple of days ago and was completely blown away. I’m the one these creeps are attacking because I was at least initially genuinely bewildered that they were sincerely supporting him and gave back some of what they dish out. They are total misogynists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Ellen Barkin looked great but I didn’t believe her being so exact about a short relationship 30+ YEARS AGO. Who believes that? She just wants attention.

still team Johnny. FYI wow Ellen Barkin was unrecognizable. I guess good that she is natural but makes me feel old.

Still team Johnny here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah the misogyny in this thread has been incredibly strong. I'm so glad people are getting called out on it now. I thought I was in some parallel universe where these viewpoints were normal and de rigeur.

I just came to this thread a couple of days ago and was completely blown away. I’m the one these creeps are attacking because I was at least initially genuinely bewildered that they were sincerely supporting him and gave back some of what they dish out. They are total misogynists.

Yes, it's amazing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

Because you’re acting like an asshole. That’s why. This entire thread has been dedicated to a psychopath unable to let go of his ex-wife, and populated by women who themselves have set back a basic and humane understanding of how DV can function several hundred years.

Why are you calling me an asshole? That was the first time I said anything to you. Your anger is worrisome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

A standard you don’t hold Johnny Depp to

What are you talking about? You don’t even know my point of view. I was in an abusive relationship myself, so instead of making assumptions, perhaps next time ask questions before going on a rampage.

[Anonymous]

I’m pro-Amber, but her agent’s claim that her career would have been similar to Ana De Armas if it wasn’t for the bad press is delusional. She was right about everything else, but that part was odd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does amber being abusive have to do with the trial? Isn’t his contention that she lied in the op Ed and it cost him opportunities?

As has been said in the thread repeatedly, he is going forward with this case to expose her behavior. It’s not about the story that she wrote.

That’s not a cause of action though. If he wanted to expose her actions he could’ve written a book or an article.

Or sat down with a new outlet. All those would have paid him rather than the millions he's paying.

This whole thing smacks of trying to punish his ex (who has to accrue her own legal fees) and it's not a good look.

A book or an interview doesn’t require her to answer his claims. Dragging it out in court makes her have to defend herself.

A bit of a Pyrrhic victory though. These trials have confirmed he cheated on Vanessa with this nut and he’s on a seemingly un-hireable amount of drugs.

I’ve said from the beginning of this thread that he just doesn’t care what this does to him/his reputation. His sole focus is embarrassing her and getting revenge.

I get the sense not many Heard campers were victims of domestic abuse.

I was.

I was covered in bruises, I had to apply body makeup to cover to go to work. Police would get called by neighbors. Landlord would call and say the neighbors say I might die and they were scared for my life (from hearing my screams). Where was my retreat? THE BATHROOM.

Oh God yes, I can very much relate to Johnny Depp hiding in the bathroom. His testimony about struggling to close the bathroom door to barricade himself basically in there, sleeping in there, having to prepare and think of how he can carefully crack it open, how Amber claimed she was hurt outside the door. It's just like the movie The Shining when it happens to you, believe me. When Nicholson said he was hurt, please open the door. Mine once said I'm bleeding, I'm bleeding, help, please open the door. I knew he had a butcher knife. I remember hanging out the window wishing I could climb down and screaming for my life . .

So please, if you have zero experience with a really violent domestic abuser, don't pass judgment. I really believe Depp.

This you, PP on this page?

Because you should have.

Written your brave story of survival.

With more gravitas and drama. Because only

You and maybe a couple of others understand how defamation civil actions work. Because of The Shining and games of telephone with landlords...