With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow even people magazine is reporting about the video where Meghan tells that woman to step aside and that Harry had asked her to issue a statement defending Meghan. I'm surprised because they are generally pro Meghan and Harry.

No one cares about this Sentebale crap.

Demanding that the woman defend Meghan is newsworthy (tabloid standards of course) because she has been previously accused of bullying in the UK and the US.

If what Sophie says is even true. She has a history of making stuff up--check the ongoing Twitter about misrepresentation on her CV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow even people magazine is reporting about the video where Meghan tells that woman to step aside and that Harry had asked her to issue a statement defending Meghan. I'm surprised because they are generally pro Meghan and Harry.

No one cares about this Sentebale crap.

Demanding that the woman defend Meghan is newsworthy (tabloid standards of course) because she has been previously accused of bullying in the UK and the US.

If what Sophie says is even true. She has a history of making stuff up--check the ongoing Twitter about misrepresentation on her CV.

I don't disagree that it might not be true, but the charity is saying they have documentation of the message from him demanding she explain why she won't defend Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Let's cut back to actual substance and speed past the bizarre Meghan hater's insults and "oh look, I'm just getting up to speed on this" attempt to redirect the convo.

Here are some questions that the Meghan haters here haven't answered/refuse to answer. Any answers welcome!

-- Sophie Chandauka spent £600k, which is half of Sentabale's annual income, without asking or telling her board. Some say she gave the money to her brother and another firm she invested in, others say she gave it to consultants she personally knew. What's going on here?

--What's with Baroness Crowder telling the Times that Sophie was extremely difficult to work for, so that Crowder left last fall before everybody else?

--Why did the entire Sentebale board ask Chandauka to resign?

--Why did Chandauka respond to orders to resign by threatening a massive lawsuit that would have bankrupted the charity she helmed? (And for the record, the board has been clear that they resigned en masse rather than let her bankrupt Sentebale with this lawsuit).

-- Why was Chandauka outraged that Netflix and Serena Williams showed up at a polo match, bringing priceless publicity to her charity? Every other charity head would have loved this. Serena probably donated too. Why is there a clip on twitter of Sophie praising Netflix at the same match?

--Why on earth would Sophie want to abandon thousands of children and young adults with AIDS, who depend on Sentebale, to enter the crowded climate change charity field? Did she want a more senior royal patron? Did she want William to absorb the charity into Earthshot?

- What is the role of William’s longtime ally and TUSK director Iain Rawlinson, who has been by Sophie’s side all week?

-- What's going on with Twitter creaming Chandauka’s resume on X,pointing out discrepancies and also that every firm she’s been involved with failed and one owes £2m in back taxes but is massively in debt and can’t pay?

-- Why is Sophie spending Sentebale's money in London, trashing Meghan and Harry, instead of, you know, going back to Lesotho to run her charity?

All righty! Can we stop with the playground insults and have a real conversation now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow even people magazine is reporting about the video where Meghan tells that woman to step aside and that Harry had asked her to issue a statement defending Meghan. I'm surprised because they are generally pro Meghan and Harry.

No one cares about this Sentebale crap.

Demanding that the woman defend Meghan is newsworthy (tabloid standards of course) because she has been previously accused of bullying in the UK and the US.

If what Sophie says is even true. She has a history of making stuff up--check the ongoing Twitter about misrepresentation on her CV.

I don't disagree that it might not be true, but the charity is saying they have documentation of the message from him demanding she explain why she won't defend Meghan.

Then produce it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

There are no serious allegations against her. You can all-caps and give your credentials (“I’m white by the way”) and hissyfit to your heart’s content - it doesn’t give you more heft. But thanks for posting. I need these periodic reminders that her fans just aren’t capable thinkers.

These are serious allegations against Chandauka, and you apparently have no answers, just even more insults.

There are zero serious allegations against Chandauka. That’s why you’re not citing them. If there were sourced believable allegations, you’d cite that. If those were non-message board or non-Daily Mail allegations, your beloved hated tabloid, you’d cite that. If there were a thing you were capable of saying besides “uhhh William tried to conquer Africa,” you’d say it and cite something.

You in fact scuttle in and try to fling insults while covering yourself in your own excrement, my beloved. So if and when you can actually build an argument about anything, feel free to pop on in.

Are you the scumbag who posted in the Prince Andrew Accuser thread that Giuffre's new video exonerates Andrew? Stop bullying Meghan and go crawl back in your cave.

Nope! Not me.

Here, love, let’s let the notoriously right-wind bullying tabloid, The Guardian, ring in on this!


“Meanwhile, it goes without saying that despite its brevity, the above paragraph will serve as the twat-signal to the so-called “Sussex Squad”, a hilarious cavalcade of single-issue human beings who patrol the internet round the clock, policing any and all criticism of the Montecito millionaire couple who ironically need expensive security in part to deal with nutjob fans like them. I mean, I’m paraphrasing, but only vaguely. The Squad also does a lot of other valuable work, like explaining that laughing at Meghan’s ridiculous Netflix lifestyle show is racist.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/01/prince-harry-institution-charity-windsors

Cute, love. You completely ignored this quote from the article's first para: "I’m in such a muddle with it all that I can’t remember if I’m allowed to say that purely from my observations of her telly interviews, Sentebale chair Sophie Chandauka does seem like a right old loose cannon."

Intead you go deep into the article for lame material that sorta, kinda, not really, supports your hatred of side players, the Sussex Squad. Who seem to be anybody who disagrees with you and your pathological hatred of Meghan. Seek professional help.

Still no answers to the many questions about one of the actual leading players, Sophie Chandauka, and what she's been up to including misappropriating 500k?

Marina Hyde’s writing and tone are too sophisticated for you. Be well!

Reporting you as a troll. Zero answers to legitimate questions about Sophie's doings, just more insults.

Who gives a crap about Sophie? The topic of the thread is Meghan's show where she made up a new last name for herself and "cooked" by putting peanut butter pretzels at a bag - all at a house that was not hers, but which she pretended to own. That's the topic - not William, Kate, Sophie, or "Sentebale" whatever the F that is.

[Anonymous]

Harry and Meghan are the toxic common denominators in everything they touch. They are so detestable.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/prince-harry-charity-sentebale-sophie-chandauka-1236176319/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow even people magazine is reporting about the video where Meghan tells that woman to step aside and that Harry had asked her to issue a statement defending Meghan. I'm surprised because they are generally pro Meghan and Harry.

No one cares about this Sentebale crap.

Demanding that the woman defend Meghan is newsworthy (tabloid standards of course) because she has been previously accused of bullying in the UK and the US.

If what Sophie says is even true. She has a history of making stuff up--check the ongoing Twitter about misrepresentation on her CV.

I don't disagree that it might not be true, but the charity is saying they have documentation of the message from him demanding she explain why she won't defend Meghan.

Likely translation, if true: Meghan using Harry’s phone. She isolated Harry from his family and clearly controls his every move. And it’s just been embarrassing disaster after embarrassing disaster. These are not serious people, they are 40-something coddled children who’ve never had a real job in their lives. And it shows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

There are no serious allegations against her. You can all-caps and give your credentials (“I’m white by the way”) and hissyfit to your heart’s content - it doesn’t give you more heft. But thanks for posting. I need these periodic reminders that her fans just aren’t capable thinkers.

These are serious allegations against Chandauka, and you apparently have no answers, just even more insults.

There are zero serious allegations against Chandauka. That’s why you’re not citing them. If there were sourced believable allegations, you’d cite that. If those were non-message board or non-Daily Mail allegations, your beloved hated tabloid, you’d cite that. If there were a thing you were capable of saying besides “uhhh William tried to conquer Africa,” you’d say it and cite something.

You in fact scuttle in and try to fling insults while covering yourself in your own excrement, my beloved. So if and when you can actually build an argument about anything, feel free to pop on in.

Are you the scumbag who posted in the Prince Andrew Accuser thread that Giuffre's new video exonerates Andrew? Stop bullying Meghan and go crawl back in your cave.

Nope! Not me.

Here, love, let’s let the notoriously right-wind bullying tabloid, The Guardian, ring in on this!


“Meanwhile, it goes without saying that despite its brevity, the above paragraph will serve as the twat-signal to the so-called “Sussex Squad”, a hilarious cavalcade of single-issue human beings who patrol the internet round the clock, policing any and all criticism of the Montecito millionaire couple who ironically need expensive security in part to deal with nutjob fans like them. I mean, I’m paraphrasing, but only vaguely. The Squad also does a lot of other valuable work, like explaining that laughing at Meghan’s ridiculous Netflix lifestyle show is racist.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/01/prince-harry-institution-charity-windsors

Cute, love. You completely ignored this quote from the article's first para: "I’m in such a muddle with it all that I can’t remember if I’m allowed to say that purely from my observations of her telly interviews, Sentebale chair Sophie Chandauka does seem like a right old loose cannon."

Intead you go deep into the article for lame material that sorta, kinda, not really, supports your hatred of side players, the Sussex Squad. Who seem to be anybody who disagrees with you and your pathological hatred of Meghan. Seek professional help.

Still no answers to the many questions about one of the actual leading players, Sophie Chandauka, and what she's been up to including misappropriating 500k?

Marina Hyde’s writing and tone are too sophisticated for you. Be well!

Reporting you as a troll. Zero answers to legitimate questions about Sophie's doings, just more insults.

Thanks for keeping my accurate rejoinder here, while doing the Lord’s work and crying to a mod! 😘

You repeatedly reference some kind of s-storm on social media without linking to it, nor of proof evidencing that any of what is claimed against the head of Sentebale is true - so what is there to discuss?

Thanks to the PP linking to the Hollywood Reporter. La Markle and her dim husband are constantly attracting bad press in ostensibly liberal circles - Vanity Fair, every major television reviewer of the execrable With Love, Meghan, THR, The Guardian. Is everyone just extremely jealous of Meghan’s Helen of Troy level beauty? Or sobbing, and not into Frette linens covered by an Hermes throw, over not getting a chance to marry Eton’s baldest red-headed cheating graduate? These are the questions that we need answers to!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

There are no serious allegations against her. You can all-caps and give your credentials (“I’m white by the way”) and hissyfit to your heart’s content - it doesn’t give you more heft. But thanks for posting. I need these periodic reminders that her fans just aren’t capable thinkers.

These are serious allegations against Chandauka, and you apparently have no answers, just even more insults.

There are zero serious allegations against Chandauka. That’s why you’re not citing them. If there were sourced believable allegations, you’d cite that. If those were non-message board or non-Daily Mail allegations, your beloved hated tabloid, you’d cite that. If there were a thing you were capable of saying besides “uhhh William tried to conquer Africa,” you’d say it and cite something.

You in fact scuttle in and try to fling insults while covering yourself in your own excrement, my beloved. So if and when you can actually build an argument about anything, feel free to pop on in.

Are you the scumbag who posted in the Prince Andrew Accuser thread that Giuffre's new video exonerates Andrew? Stop bullying Meghan and go crawl back in your cave.

Nope! Not me.

Here, love, let’s let the notoriously right-wind bullying tabloid, The Guardian, ring in on this!


“Meanwhile, it goes without saying that despite its brevity, the above paragraph will serve as the twat-signal to the so-called “Sussex Squad”, a hilarious cavalcade of single-issue human beings who patrol the internet round the clock, policing any and all criticism of the Montecito millionaire couple who ironically need expensive security in part to deal with nutjob fans like them. I mean, I’m paraphrasing, but only vaguely. The Squad also does a lot of other valuable work, like explaining that laughing at Meghan’s ridiculous Netflix lifestyle show is racist.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/01/prince-harry-institution-charity-windsors

Cute, love. You completely ignored this quote from the article's first para: "I’m in such a muddle with it all that I can’t remember if I’m allowed to say that purely from my observations of her telly interviews, Sentebale chair Sophie Chandauka does seem like a right old loose cannon."

Intead you go deep into the article for lame material that sorta, kinda, not really, supports your hatred of side players, the Sussex Squad. Who seem to be anybody who disagrees with you and your pathological hatred of Meghan. Seek professional help.

Still no answers to the many questions about one of the actual leading players, Sophie Chandauka, and what she's been up to including misappropriating 500k?

Marina Hyde’s writing and tone are too sophisticated for you. Be well!

Reporting you as a troll. Zero answers to legitimate questions about Sophie's doings, just more insults.

Thanks for keeping my accurate rejoinder here, while doing the Lord’s work and crying to a mod! 😘

You repeatedly reference some kind of s-storm on social media without linking to it, nor of proof evidencing that any of what is claimed against the head of Sentebale is true - so what is there to discuss?

Thanks to the PP linking to the Hollywood Reporter. La Markle and her dim husband are constantly attracting bad press in ostensibly liberal circles - Vanity Fair, every major television reviewer of the execrable With Love, Meghan, THR, The Guardian. Is everyone just extremely jealous of Meghan’s Helen of Troy level beauty? Or sobbing, and not into Frette linens covered by an Hermes throw, over not getting a chance to marry Eton’s baldest red-headed cheating graduate? These are the questions that we need answers to!

Not doing your homework for you. You've shown yourself capable of doing social media, at least the Hating-on-Meghan part, so get them yourself. Answer the questions instead deflecting and Gish galloping.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow even people magazine is reporting about the video where Meghan tells that woman to step aside and that Harry had asked her to issue a statement defending Meghan. I'm surprised because they are generally pro Meghan and Harry.

No one cares about this Sentebale crap.

Demanding that the woman defend Meghan is newsworthy (tabloid standards of course) because she has been previously accused of bullying in the UK and the US.

If what Sophie says is even true. She has a history of making stuff up--check the ongoing Twitter about misrepresentation on her CV.

I don't disagree that it might not be true, but the charity is saying they have documentation of the message from him demanding she explain why she won't defend Meghan.

Likely translation, if true: Meghan using Harry’s phone. She isolated Harry from his family and clearly controls his every move. And it’s just been embarrassing disaster after embarrassing disaster. These are not serious people, they are 40-something coddled children who’ve never had a real job in their lives. And it shows.

You make cr@p up and post it like it's real. Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow even people magazine is reporting about the video where Meghan tells that woman to step aside and that Harry had asked her to issue a statement defending Meghan. I'm surprised because they are generally pro Meghan and Harry.

No one cares about this Sentebale crap.

Demanding that the woman defend Meghan is newsworthy (tabloid standards of course) because she has been previously accused of bullying in the UK and the US.

If what Sophie says is even true. She has a history of making stuff up--check the ongoing Twitter about misrepresentation on her CV.

I don't disagree that it might not be true, but the charity is saying they have documentation of the message from him demanding she explain why she won't defend Meghan.

Likely translation, if true: Meghan using Harry’s phone. She isolated Harry from his family and clearly controls his every move. And it’s just been embarrassing disaster after embarrassing disaster. These are not serious people, they are 40-something coddled children who’ve never had a real job in their lives. And it shows.

?? Or he's extremely defensive of Meghan and their sussex brand himself. Harry is not some innocent little baby whose being controlled. He had issues with his family before he ever met Meghan. Read spare and his previous interviews. That man is happy he found someone who was willing to take on his family with him.

The infantilization of Harry needs to stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow even people magazine is reporting about the video where Meghan tells that woman to step aside and that Harry had asked her to issue a statement defending Meghan. I'm surprised because they are generally pro Meghan and Harry.

No one cares about this Sentebale crap.

Demanding that the woman defend Meghan is newsworthy (tabloid standards of course) because she has been previously accused of bullying in the UK and the US.

If what Sophie says is even true. She has a history of making stuff up--check the ongoing Twitter about misrepresentation on her CV.

I don't disagree that it might not be true, but the charity is saying they have documentation of the message from him demanding she explain why she won't defend Meghan.

Likely translation, if true: Meghan using Harry’s phone. She isolated Harry from his family and clearly controls his every move. And it’s just been embarrassing disaster after embarrassing disaster. These are not serious people, they are 40-something coddled children who’ve never had a real job in their lives. And it shows.

?? Or he's extremely defensive of Meghan and their sussex brand himself. Harry is not some innocent little baby whose being controlled. He had issues with his family before he ever met Meghan. Read spare and his previous interviews. That man is happy he found someone who was willing to take on his family with him.

The infantilization of Harry needs to stop.

“Take on his family with him”? He trashed them and then expressed surprise that they cut him off. They don’t care about him anymore.

I agree though that he shouldn’t be infantilized. The best way to understand him is to recognize that he’s dumb, it’s not Meghan’s fault that he was easy to fool and give up so much for her. If he were so happy in his new life he wouldn’t be obsessed with getting security in the UK so he can spend extended time there (I’m sure his family don’t want him there and it’s a relief for them that he lost in court).

[Anonymous]

The pathetic British royalist trolls are so trashy and ruin every thread. I guess that’s their goal. But you haven’t changed my mind about H&M. They are the only decent people in that cruel, dysfunctional family, and they are way better than you trolls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's cut back to actual substance and speed past the bizarre Meghan hater's insults and "oh look, I'm just getting up to speed on this" attempt to redirect the convo.

Here are some questions that the Meghan haters here haven't answered/refuse to answer. Any answers welcome!

-- Sophie Chandauka spent £600k, which is half of Sentabale's annual income, without asking or telling her board. Some say she gave the money to her brother and another firm she invested in, others say she gave it to consultants she personally knew. What's going on here?

--What's with Baroness Crowder telling the Times that Sophie was extremely difficult to work for, so that Crowder left last fall before everybody else?

--Why did the entire Sentebale board ask Chandauka to resign?

--Why did Chandauka respond to orders to resign by threatening a massive lawsuit that would have bankrupted the charity she helmed? (And for the record, the board has been clear that they resigned en masse rather than let her bankrupt Sentebale with this lawsuit).

-- Why was Chandauka outraged that Netflix and Serena Williams showed up at a polo match, bringing priceless publicity to her charity? Every other charity head would have loved this. Serena probably donated too. Why is there a clip on twitter of Sophie praising Netflix at the same match?

--Why on earth would Sophie want to abandon thousands of children and young adults with AIDS, who depend on Sentebale, to enter the crowded climate change charity field? Did she want a more senior royal patron? Did she want William to absorb the charity into Earthshot?

- What is the role of William’s longtime ally and TUSK director Iain Rawlinson, who has been by Sophie’s side all week?

-- What's going on with Twitter creaming Chandauka’s resume on X,pointing out discrepancies and also that every firm she’s been involved with failed and one owes £2m in back taxes but is massively in debt and can’t pay?

-- Why is Sophie spending Sentebale's money in London, trashing Meghan and Harry, instead of, you know, going back to Lesotho to run her charity?

All righty! Can we stop with the playground insults and have a real conversation now?

All righty…. Where are the links that back up anything at all you say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's cut back to actual substance and speed past the bizarre Meghan hater's insults and "oh look, I'm just getting up to speed on this" attempt to redirect the convo.

Here are some questions that the Meghan haters here haven't answered/refuse to answer. Any answers welcome!

-- Sophie Chandauka spent £600k, which is half of Sentabale's annual income, without asking or telling her board. Some say she gave the money to her brother and another firm she invested in, others say she gave it to consultants she personally knew. What's going on here?

--What's with Baroness Crowder telling the Times that Sophie was extremely difficult to work for, so that Crowder left last fall before everybody else?

--Why did the entire Sentebale board ask Chandauka to resign?

--Why did Chandauka respond to orders to resign by threatening a massive lawsuit that would have bankrupted the charity she helmed? (And for the record, the board has been clear that they resigned en masse rather than let her bankrupt Sentebale with this lawsuit).

-- Why was Chandauka outraged that Netflix and Serena Williams showed up at a polo match, bringing priceless publicity to her charity? Every other charity head would have loved this. Serena probably donated too. Why is there a clip on twitter of Sophie praising Netflix at the same match?

--Why on earth would Sophie want to abandon thousands of children and young adults with AIDS, who depend on Sentebale, to enter the crowded climate change charity field? Did she want a more senior royal patron? Did she want William to absorb the charity into Earthshot?

- What is the role of William’s longtime ally and TUSK director Iain Rawlinson, who has been by Sophie’s side all week?

-- What's going on with Twitter creaming Chandauka’s resume on X,pointing out discrepancies and also that every firm she’s been involved with failed and one owes £2m in back taxes but is massively in debt and can’t pay?

-- Why is Sophie spending Sentebale's money in London, trashing Meghan and Harry, instead of, you know, going back to Lesotho to run her charity?

All righty! Can we stop with the playground insults and have a real conversation now?

All righty…. Where are the links that back up anything at all you say?

She got it all from the same tabloids that "don't count" when it portrays H&M in a negative light. And of course it's all been briefed by H&M, the very same couple who decry the use of tabloids for such shenanigans. At least Sophie is going on the record, unlike those two cowards.